Patient Research Cohort: Rapidly Evolving Multiple Sclerosis (PRC-REMS)

February 11, 2021 updated by: Imperial College London

Patient Research Cohort: Rapidly Evolving Multiple Sclerosis Opening the Window of Therapeutic Opportunity

The primary goal of the research cohort is to facilitate patient access to clinical trials testing new therapeutic interventions, or access to second- line treatments.

Secondary objectives of the research cohort study are to obtain detailed clinical phenotyping and immunological analysis of blood samples, aiming to identify and validate biomarkers of disease activity and response to treatment and prognostic markers.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Eligible patients with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Description

  • Male or Female, aged 18-65
  • Able to give informed consent
  • Diagnosis of MS according to to the revised McDonald's criteria (Polman et al. Ann Neurol 2005)
  • Relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive MS form
  • Disease duration ≤15 years from diagnosis
  • Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score 2.0 to 6.0 at screening evaluation
  • Highly active and/or treatment-refractory MS activity defined as:

    1. Two or more clinical exacerbations in the previous 12 months, regardless of treatment; OR:
    2. One clinical exacerbation and sustained increase in EDSS of at least 1 point in the previous 12 months after receiving immune-modifying treatment, OR:
    3. Evidence of gadolinium (contrast)-enhancement or increase of T2 lesion load at MRI after receiving immune-modifying treatment. OR
    4. Not tolerating or not wishing to receive any of the available immune-modifying treatments and meeting one of the stated criteria (b or c) for MS activity in treated subjects (1 relapse and increase in EDSS of at least 1 point in the previous 12 months; or evidence of contrast-enhancement or increase of T2 lesion load at MRI).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to MRI including but not limited to intracranial aneurism clips (except Sugita), history of intra-orbital metal fragments that have not been removed by an MD (as confirmed by orbital X-Ray), pacemaker and non-MR compatible heart valves, inner ear implants, history of claustrophobia or subject feels unable to lie still on their back for a period of 1.5 hours in the MRI scanner.
  • If female, positive urine pregnancy test
  • History or presence of renal impairment (e.g. serum creatinine clearance less than 30ml/min)
  • Inability to give informed consent/comply with study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Multiple Sclerosis
Patients with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Research Cohort Subjects Referred Into a Clinical Trial or Offered Treatment With an Appropriate Second-line Therapy.
Time Frame: Two years
The primary goal of the observational research cohort is to facilitate patient access to clinical trials testing new therapeutic interventions or appropriate management for rapidly evolving multiple sclerosis (MS). This was devised as a single, combined primary outcome measure. The primary outcome is the proportion of research cohort subjects either referred into a clinical trial or offered treatment with an appropriate second-line therapy. (approved Protocol Version 4.1 - September 13th, 2011). The statistical assumption based on data from similar research cohorts stipulated that 50% of recruited patients will consent to proceed to further clinical trials or access new therapies.
Two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Access and Utilization of Cohort Data
Time Frame: two years
The outcome reports the Number of participants whose data was used in any approved research. Examples of utilisation of data include imaging data analysis for MS-related research performed on the study participants' dataset and analysis of correlation of clinical phenotype with imaging data. Given the exploratory nature, no specific quantitative assumptions are made on the secondary outcome. Examples of studies utilising the anonymised cohort data: (1) Rapidly evolving multiple sclerosis: MRI findings predict clinical progression and disease phenotype (Dr Jean Lee, Dr A Waldmann, Dr R Newbould, ICL). (2) A study to characterize the novel TSPO PET radioligand [18F]PBR111 as an in vivo marker of microglial activation in Multiple Sclerosis (Dr A Colasanti, Imanova Ltd and GlaxoSmithKline). Conditions for participants to meet this outcome measure are: (A) completion of study visits (B) maintained (non-revoked) consent and (C) utilisation of the anonymised data in any further study.
two years
Development of Biomarkers
Time Frame: two years

The outcome consists of the Number of participants whose data was used in biomarkers development studies. Biomarkers studies include analysis of blood immunological studies performed on the study participants' dataset and analysis of correlation of clinical phenotype with immunological data, examples given below. Conditions for participants to meet this outcome measure are: (A) completion of study visits (B) maintained (non-revoked) consent and (C) utilisation of the anonymised immunological and clinical data in any biomarkers study.

Given the exploratory nature, no quantitative assumptions are made on the outcome. Examples of studies of biomarkers: 1) Functional relevance of haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation following therapeutic alpha 4-integrin blockade in multiple sclerosis (Dr MMattoscio, ICL).

2)The relationship between T cell responses and disease progression in demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system (Prof D Altmann, ICL).

two years
Development of Clinical Prognostic Markers.
Time Frame: two years

The outcome consists of the Number of participants whose data was used in studies aimed at the development of markers of clinical prognosis. Those are studies involving statistical analysis and models that may enable prognostic predictions from clinical phenotype, imaging and immunological data in any combination, with examples indicated below. Conditions for participants to meet this outcome measure are: (A) completion of study visits (B) maintained (non-revoked) consent and (C) utilisation of the anonymised imaging immunological and clinical data in any prognostic development research.

Given their exploratory nature, no specific quantitative assumptions are made on the secondary outcome. Example of studies of prognostic markers: 1) Worse Physical Disability is associated with High Blood frequency of CD8+CD57+(ILT2+PD-1+) T-cells in MS Patients with Older Appearing Brains (Dr S Jacobs, Prof R Nicholas and Prof J Cole, Imperial College London and KCL).

two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis

3
Subscribe