- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01054222
Local, Open-Label, Extension Trial Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine In Elderly Patients With Overactive Bladder
April 2, 2013 updated by: Pfizer
A Local, Multicentre, Open-Label, Extension Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine Flexible Dose Regimen In Elderly Patients With Overactive Bladder
This is an open-label extension study intended for subjects who have previously completed study A0221045 (fesoterodine in elderly OAB patients) and who have been recommended by the investigator as being suitable for the extended use of Fesoterodine.
Data from this study will extend the evaluation of efficacy, tolerability and safety of Fesoterodine in older subjects from Portugal.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
31
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lisboa, Portugal, 1990-273
- Centro de Avaliação Geriátrica
-
Porto, Portugal, 4200-319
- Hospital de Sao Joao
-
Porto, Portugal, 4099-005
- Hospital Ordem do Carmo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects must have previously completed fesoterodine study A0221045 [in Portugal]
- Subjects must be recommended for inclusion by the investigator
Exclusion Criteria:
- Conditions or states excluding use of fesoterodine e.g. contraindication to fesoterodine
- Predominant stress incontinence as determined by the investigator
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
OTHER: Fesoterodine 4 mg
Dose determined as per previous drug regime in A0221045 and investigator's evaluation.
|
Fesoterodine fumarate, sustained release (SR) tablet, 4 mg once daily, oral, duration - until fesoterodine is commercially available in Portugal or until 31 Dec 2011 (whichever is earlier)
Other Names:
Fesoterodine fumarate, sustained release (SR) tablet, 8 mg once daily, oral, duration - until fesoterodine is commercially available in Portugal or until 31 Dec 2011 (whichever is earlier)
Other Names:
|
|
OTHER: Fesoterodine 8 mg
Dose determined as per previous drug regime in A0221045 and investigator's evaluation.
|
Fesoterodine fumarate, sustained release (SR) tablet, 4 mg once daily, oral, duration - until fesoterodine is commercially available in Portugal or until 31 Dec 2011 (whichever is earlier)
Other Names:
Fesoterodine fumarate, sustained release (SR) tablet, 8 mg once daily, oral, duration - until fesoterodine is commercially available in Portugal or until 31 Dec 2011 (whichever is earlier)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours (End of Treatment [EOT])
Time Frame: End of Treatment (up to Week 82)
|
The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of greater than or equal to (>=) 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit.
USS total range 1 to 5: 1.
No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
|
End of Treatment (up to Week 82)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18
|
The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit.
USS total range 1 to 5: 1.
No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18
|
|
Mean Number of Severe Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
The mean number of severe micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to (>=) 4 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit.
USS total range 1 to 5: 1.
No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI).
UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline.
USS total range 1 to 5: 1.
No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
Nocturnal micturitions were defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between the time the participant went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day.
USS rating: 1.
No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
The mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of nocturnal micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary.
USS total range 1 to 5: 1.
No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Daily Sum Rating on the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
The daily sum rating was calculated as the mean rating score on the USS multiplied by the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at that visit.
USS total range 1 to 5: 1.
No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Numerical decrease indicates improvement.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Percentage of Incontinent Participants at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary.
USS total range 1 to 5: 1.
No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
|
Baseline
|
|
Percentage of Participants With No Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episode
Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary.
USS total range 1 to 5: 1.
No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
|
Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Mean Number of Urinary Incontinence Pads, Barrier Creams and Powder Used Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
The mean number of urinary incontinence pads (IP), barrier creams (BC) and powder used per 24 hours is calculated as the total number of IP, BC and powder used divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Month 3,6,9,12,15,18, and End of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
PPBC: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asked participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems.
PPBC assessment rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems.
Change = observation minus baseline.
Results categorized as Deterioration (score difference ≥1), No Change (score difference=0), Improvement (score difference less than [<]0).
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Months 3,6,9,12,15,18, and End of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
PPUS: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that measured the participant's perception of urinary urgency.
It was sensitive to changes in perceptions of urinary urgency over time.
Score of 0 (usually not able to hold urine), 1 (usually able to hold urine [without leaking] until reaching toilet if go to toilet immediately), or 2 (usually able to finish what he/she was doing before going to toilet [without leaking]).
Change = observation minus baseline.
Deterioration: negative difference of scores; improvement: increase of 1 or more points in difference of scores, relative to baseline.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms.
Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother).
Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48.
Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100.
Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms.
Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother).
Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains: concern, coping, sleep, and social function.
HRQL domain and total raw score derived as sum of scores.
Transformed score range 0 to 100 (Total HRQL or domain) = [(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range]*100.
Higher transformed scores indicative of better HRQL.
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)
|
|
Number of Participants With Response to Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-s) (Questions 5, 9, 10a-10d, and 11a-11b)
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 82)
|
OAB-s assessed OAB medication expectations, daily life with OAB, and satisfaction with OAB medication.
Question (Q) 5 evaluates OAB medication expectations (exceeds/meets or does not meet expectation).
Q9 to 11 assessed satisfaction with OAB medication's ability to allow reaching bathroom without urine loss (Q9), decrease: sudden urgencies to urinate (Q10a), urine loss due to urgency (Q10b), waking up at night to urinate (Q10c) and urination during day (Q10d), and improve control of urine loss (Q11a) and need to urinate (Q11b).
Q9 to 11 were answered as 'very satisfied', 'somewhat satisfied', 'neither dissatisfied nor satisfied', 'somewhat dissatisfied', and 'very dissatisfied'.
The results for Q9 to 11 are reported as "satisfied" (participants who answered 'very satisfied' or 'somewhat satisfied' for all 7 questions) or "not satisfied" (participants who answered 'neither dissatisfied nor satisfied' or 'somewhat dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' for all 7 questions).
|
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 82)
|
|
King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 82)
|
KHQ: self-administered questionnaire contained 21 questions scored in 9 domains (general health perception, incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, sleep/energy, and severity of urinary symptoms).
Each domain score ranged: 0-100, where 0=best outcome/response and 100=worst outcome/response.
|
Baseline, End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 82)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2012
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 20, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 20, 2010
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
January 22, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
May 15, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 2, 2013
Last Verified
February 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urologic Diseases
- Urinary Bladder Diseases
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
- Urological Manifestations
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Muscarinic Antagonists
- Cholinergic Antagonists
- Cholinergic Agents
- Urological Agents
- Fesoterodine
Other Study ID Numbers
- A0221090
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Urinary Bladder, Overactive
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCTerminatedOveractive Bladder | Overactive Urinary Bladder
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityCompletedOveractive Bladder | Overactive Detrusor | Overactive Bladder SyndromeTurkey
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...CompletedOveractive Bladder (OAB)United States, Canada, Germany, Korea, Republic of, Spain, Turkey, Taiwan, Italy, Slovakia, Denmark, South Africa, United Kingdom, Mexico, Sweden, Norway
-
Medstar Health Research InstituteColumbia University; University of Michigan; University of New Mexico; Methodist...Terminated
-
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.CompletedOveractive Bladder (OAB)United States, Canada
-
Loyola UniversityAstellas Pharma IncCompletedOveractive Bladder SyndromeUnited States
-
Beijing Pins Medical Co., LtdUnknown
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterUnknownLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Overactive Bladder SyndromeNetherlands
-
Pamukkale UniversityCompletedElectrical Stimulation | Idiopathic Overactive Bladder | Bladder TrainingTurkey
Clinical Trials on Fesoterodine
-
PfizerCompletedUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicJapan
-
PfizerCompletedUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicFrance, United States, Spain, Korea, Republic of, United Kingdom, Malaysia, Taiwan, Finland, Japan, Lithuania, Italy, Turkey, Estonia, Slovakia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Greece, India, Philippines, Poland, Russian Federation, South... and more
-
PfizerCompletedNeurogenic Detrusor OveractivityBelgium
-
PfizerCompletedOveractive BladderKorea, Republic of, United States, Denmark, Germany, Canada, Hungary, Poland, France, United Kingdom, Slovakia, Sweden, Mexico, Czech Republic, Finland, Italy, Lithuania, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Egypt, Greece, Norway, Philippines, Russian Federation and more
-
PfizerTerminated
-
PfizerCompletedNeurogenic Detrusor OveractivityBelgium
-
PfizerCompletedOveractive BladderCosta Rica, United States, Korea, Republic of, Germany, Slovakia, Ukraine, Belgium, Poland, Czechia
-
PfizerCompletedUrinary Bladder, OveractivePortugal, Spain, Turkey, Finland, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Slovakia, Italy, Austria, United Kingdom, Belgium, Denmark, Israel, Switzerland