TAASS-Traumeel Ointment and Gel Compared With a Topical NSAID in Athletes With Acute Ankle Sprain (TAASS)

December 9, 2013 updated by: Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH

A Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Study on the Effectiveness of Traumeel S (Both Ointment and Gel) in Terms of Pain and Function Compared With a Topical NSAID in Athletes With Acute Ankle Sprain

The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of Traumeel S (both ointment and gel) compared to another antiinflammatory drug called Diclofenac in patients with a sprained ankle.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study objective is the confirmatory proof of efficacy for Traumeel® S topical treatment, both ointment and gel, as compared to diclofenac topical treatment for patients with ankle sprain. In addition tolerability/safety of both drug preparations is to be compared, so that the benefit-risk relation can be determined.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

449

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain
        • MEDYR Medicina Deportiva y Rehabilitación

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Athletes with an acute unilateral ankle sprain of the lateral ligaments of the ankle joint both male and female
  • Moderate (30-60 mm) to severe (>60 mm) pain according to the patient's assessment of ankle pain visual analogue scale (VAS) on weight bearing, unable to perform normal training / sports activities
  • 18 - 40 years of age
  • injury occurred within 24 hours of the first dose of study medication
  • Willing and able to give written informed consent
  • Available for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Similar injury affecting the same joint within the past 6 months
  • bilateral ankle injury
  • bed rest, hospitalization, surgery use of a non-removable rigid cast
  • Clinically important abnormality for screening laboratory tests
  • Debilitating acute or chronic illness
  • Use of corticosteroids in the previous 8 weeks, any analgesics in the previous 6 hours, or 24 hours in case of long-acting NSAID, COX-2 specific inhibitors, or tramadol
  • History of sensitivity to any component of the study drugs
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with all the requirements of the protocol
  • Participation in other studies within 4 weeks prior to study entry and or during the study participation
  • Current substance or alcohol abuse that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with compliance or with interpretation of the study result

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Traumeel S ointment
Traumeel S ointment 2 g, 3 times daily topical during 14 days
2 g, 3 times daily topical during 14 days
Other Names:
  • Traumeel S ointment, Traumeel S gel, Diclofenac gel
Experimental: Traumeel S gel
Traumeel S gel 2 g, 3 times daily topical during 14 days
2 g, 3 times daily topical during 14 days
Active Comparator: Diclofenac gel
Diclofenac gel 2 g, 3 times daily topical during 14 days
2 g, 3 times daily topical during 14 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient's Assessment of Ankle Pain (VAS)- Absolute Value Decrease on Day 7
Time Frame: From baseline (day 1) visit to day 7

Pain evaluated by a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 means no pain and 100 means the highest, unbearable pain. The absolute values of VAS have been the basis of analysis.

The highest is the change in negative, the better are the results in absolute values.

From baseline (day 1) visit to day 7
Change of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement (FAAM), Activity of Daily Living Subscale (ADL) From Baseline to Day 7
Time Frame: Day 1 to day 7

The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a self-report outcome instrument developed to assess physical function for individuals with foot and ankle related impairments. The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure is a 29-item questionnaire divided into two subscales: the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, 21-item Activities of Daily Living Subscale and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, 8-item Sports Subscale.

Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (4 to 0) from 'no difficulty at all' (score 4), ´slight difficulty´, ´moderate difficulty´, éxtreme difficulty´ to 'unable to do' (score 0). Responses marked as ´not applicable´were not counted.

Item score totals, which range from 0 to 84 for the ADL subscale and 0 to 32 for the Sports subscale, were transformed to percentage scores. Higher scores represent higher levels of function for each subscale, with 100% representing no dysfunction.

Day 1 to day 7
Patient's Assessment of Ankle Pain (VAS)- Percentage Decrease on Day 7
Time Frame: From baseline (day 1) visit to day 7

Pain evaluated by a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) where 0 means no pain and 100 means the highest, unbearable pain. The absolute values of VAS have been the basis of analysis.

The highest is the change in negative, the better are the results in percentages.

From baseline (day 1) visit to day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
FAAM ADL Subscale
Time Frame: Day 1 to 4, 14, 42
Day 1 to 4, 14, 42
FAAM Sports Subscale
Time Frame: Day 1 to 4, 7, 14, 42
Day 1 to 4, 7, 14, 42
Swelling ('Figure-of-eight')
Time Frame: Day 1 to 4,7,14
Day 1 to 4,7,14
Physician's Assessment of Normal Function/Activity (5-point-scale)
Time Frame: Day 1 to 4, 7, 14, 42
Day 1 to 4, 7, 14, 42
Time to Normal Function (Training/Sports)
Time Frame: Day 1 to 4, 7, 14, 42
Day 1 to 4, 7, 14, 42
Global Judgment of Efficacy
Time Frame: Day 14
Day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Carlos Gonzalez de Vega, MD, National coordinating investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sprain of Ankle

Clinical Trials on Traumeel S ointment

Subscribe