Hormone Replacement Therapy for Use in Postmenopausal Women for Relief of Hot Flushes and Urogenital Symptoms.

April 15, 2013 updated by: Warner Chilcott

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Controlled, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy in Relief of Hot Flushes in Women Receiving Oral Estradiol Acetate Tablets, Oral Estradiol Tablets or Oral Conjugated Equine Estrogens

Multicenter, double-blind, controlled, parallel group, randomized study to compare the clinical benefit of Estradiol acetate tablets, estradiol tablets and conjugated equine estrogen tablets, each administered orally, once daily, to postmenopausal women.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

249

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85031
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • California
      • Carmichael, California, United States, 95608
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92108
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Boynton Beach, Florida, United States, 33437
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33765
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Daytona Beach, Florida, United States, 32114
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32605
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Longwood, Florida, United States, 32779
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Melbourne, Florida, United States, 32935
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Palm Springs, Florida, United States, 33461
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Pinellas Park, Florida, United States, 33781
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34232
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Venice, Florida, United States, 34285
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Georgia
      • Roswell, Georgia, United States, 30075
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61615
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Maryland
      • Laurel, Maryland, United States, 20707
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68510
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27612
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Winston Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44122
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43212
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Mogadore, Ohio, United States, 44260
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15206
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84124
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99201
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98405
        • Warner Chilcott Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 40 years of age; bilateral oophorectomy ≥ 35 years of age.
  2. Non-hysterectomized women:

    • Amenorrhea for ≥ 12 months or
    • Amenorrhea for ≤ 12 months, but longer than 6 months, and serum FSH (follicle stimulating hormone) levels > 40 units/L and serum estradiol levels < 20 pg /mL,

    Hysterectomized women:

    • Bilateral oophorectomy - subjects may enter the study 6 weeks after surgery or
    • History of removal of ovaries may be confirmed by - serum FSH levels > 40 units/L and serum estradiol levels < 20 pg/mL or via surgical report / ultrasound.
  3. Seven or more moderate or severe hot flushes daily for 1 week or 60 or more moderate or severe flushes in 1 week during the 2 week screening period prior to study entry.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hormone therapy administered via the following routes and during the specified timeframes: oral within 8 weeks, vaginal (rings, creams, gels) within 1 week, transdermal within 4 weeks, intramuscular within 6 weeks, progestational implants, estrogen or estrogen/progestational injectable drug therapy within 3 months, estrogen pellet or progestational injectable within 6 months.
  2. Abnormal Pap smear suggestive of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL) or worse. Enrollment of subjects with an ASCUS (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) interpretation must be discussed with the sponsor prior to randomization.
  3. Urinary tract infection
  4. Congestive heart failure
  5. Uncontrolled hypertension; sitting systolic BP ≥ 160 mmHg or diastolic ≥ 95 mmHg
  6. History of stroke or transient ischemic attacks
  7. Treatment with anticoagulants (heparin or warfarin).
  8. Uncontrolled thyroid disorders.
  9. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
  10. Increase frequency or severity of headaches including migraines during previous estrogen therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Estradiol acetate (E3A)
Tablet containing 0.9 mg E3A, daily oral administration.
Active Comparator: Estradiol
Tablet containing 1 mg estradiol, daily oral administration.
Other Names:
  • Estrace
Active Comparator: Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE):
Tablet containing 0.625 mg CEE, daily oral administration.
Other Names:
  • Premarin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 4, ITT (Intention to Treat) Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
Severity of hot flush definitions: mild - sensation of heat without perspiration, moderate - sensation of heat with perspiration, able to continue activity, severe - sensation of heat with perspiration, causing the subject to stop activity or awaken from sleep
Baseline to Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Severity of hot flush definitions: mild - sensation of heat without perspiration, moderate - sensation of heat with perspiration, able to continue activity, severe - sensation of heat with perspiration, causing the subject to stop activity or awaken from sleep
Baseline to Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 4, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
Patient self-reported outcome. Severity of hot flush definitions: mild (1) - sensation of heat without perspiration, moderate (2) - sensation of heat with perspiration, able to continue activity, severe (3) - sensation of heat with perspiration, causing the subject to stop activity or awaken from sleep. Minimum 0/no hot flushes, Maximum 3/all severe hot flushes. Lower the score the greater the improvement in reducing hot flushes.
Baseline to Week 4
Mean Change From Baseline in the Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flushes, Week 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Patient self-reported outcome. Severity of hot flush definitions: mild (1) - sensation of heat without perspiration, moderate (2) - sensation of heat with perspiration, able to continue activity, severe (3) - sensation of heat with perspiration, causing the subject to stop activity or awaken from sleep. Minimum 0/no hot flushes, Maximum 3/all severe hot flushes. Lower the score the greater the improvement in reducing hot flushes.
Baseline to Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Urogenital Symptom Score, Week 4, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
Urogenital Symptom Severity scored none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3.
Baseline to Week 4
Change From Baseline in Total Urogenital Symptom Score, Week 8, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Urogenital Symptom Severity scored none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3.
Baseline to Week 8
Change From Baseline in Total Urogenital Symptom Score, Week 12, ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Urogenital Symptom Severity scored none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3.
Baseline to Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Herman Ellman, MD, Warner Chilcott

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 22, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hormone Replacement Therapy

Clinical Trials on Estradiol acetate

3
Subscribe