Self Management and Reminders With Technology: SMART Appraisal of an Integrated Personal Health Record (PHR) (SMART PHR)

May 20, 2014 updated by: University of Pittsburgh

Self Management & Reminders With Technology: SMART Appraisal of an Integrated Personal Health Record (SMART PHR)

This project seeks to improve health care outcomes in complex patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or who are at high risk for developing CVD by promoting patient self-management. This will be accomplished in 4 diverse, large primary care practices through the following 3 aims: (1) develop a patient-specific, active component to an existing electronic PHR directed towards patients with complex illnesses that is designed to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, (2) conduct a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of passive and active PHRs for improving adherence and clinical outcomes of complex patients in an ambulatory environment, and (3) enumerate the barriers and facilitators to implementation and use of an PHR among providers and patients in an ambulatory setting. To accomplish the aim 1, a users group will be assembled to determine which potential features of an 'active PHR' would be most acceptable and useful to them. To accomplish the 2nd aim, 1,000 patients with complex chronic disease leading to increased cardiovascular risk (i.e., CVD or 2 of the 4 conditions of hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), or hyperlipidemia requiring at least one medication for control) will be randomized to a passive PHR (n=500), or an active PHR (n=500) at 4 sites where the PHR currently is installed and in use. Outcomes to be assessed include improvement in control of risk factors (e.g., blood pressure), frequency of compliance with testing guidelines (e.g., annual dilated retinal exams in DM), and clinical outcomes (e.g., myocardial infarction, hospitalizations). Aim 3 will be accomplished by surveying all participants using the PHR, along with nurses and physicians at the study sites, and by conducting focus groups of PHR participants, nurses, and physicians to determine the most useful features of the PHR and to barriers and facilitators of use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1815

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • UPMC Primary Care practices

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >=18, if they have medically complex diseases that increase cardiovascular risk not yet a PHR user

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current PHR user life-expectancy of less than 6 months dementia or disability that prevents them from being able to utilize a PHR (such as blindness)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SMART PHR
Patients receive the active PHR
Patient receives an active PHR
Other: Passive PHR
Usual PHR Care
Usual passive PHR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
improved targeted chronic disease outcomes
Time Frame: 1 year
blood pressure and low density lipoprotein level (LDL) in all patients, and A1C in patients who have diabetes. For patients on medications requiring monitoring of electrolytes and creatinine, we will look at changes in these parameters as well.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in value in these outcome measures (lipid levels, blood pressure, and A1c levels)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
rates of adherence to diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark S Roberts, MD, MPP, University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 2, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HS018167

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Risk

Clinical Trials on SMART PHR

Subscribe