Study of the Sensitivity of Manual vs Electric Aspiration to Detect Completed Early Abortion

December 6, 2016 updated by: Planned Parenthood of Greater New York

The Sensitivity of Manual Versus Electric Vacuum Aspiration to Detect Completed Abortion at Less Than Six Weeks of Pregnancy

With sensitive urine pregnancy tests, women are now able to confirm very early pregnancies. However, approximately one third of abortion facilities do not offer abortions at less than six weeks of pregnancy. Providers may be concerned that they will be unable to identify products of conception (POCs) in uterine aspirates after early abortion and about the time, cost and risk associated with following serum hCG levels when completed abortion cannot be confirmed by gross inspection. Many providers believe that manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) causes less destruction of pregnancy tissue and therefore may increase the likelihood of identifying POCs on gross inspection. No published reports specifically compare MVA to electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) for the detection of complete products of conception and none compare MVA and EVA at less than 6 weeks of pregnancy. We, the investigators, propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the sensitivity of MVA to EVA for the detection of completed abortion in 500 women with pregnancies of less than 6 weeks gestation at a large inner city family planning center. We will measure positive identification of POCs on gross inspection in patients subsequently shown to have completed abortions. We hypothesize that the rate of true positive detection of POCs will be higher in dilation and curettage (D&C) using MVA than EVA.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10012
        • Planned Parenthood of New York City - Margaret Sanger Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • gestational sac size <12 mm or no visible sac (with positive pregnancy test) day of surgical abortion
  • no medical contraindications to outpatient abortion at study site

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not able to consent
  • suspected ectopic pregnancy (pelvic mass, unilateral pain, or detection on ultrasound), suspected molar pregnancy, or no sac and vaginal bleeding suspicious for completed spontaneous abortion
  • failed medication abortion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Manual Vacuum Aspiration
Participants will be randomized to receive their abortion using either manual vacuum aspiration or electric vacuum aspiration.
Active Comparator: Electric Vacuum Aspiration
Participants will be randomized to receive their abortion using either manual vacuum aspiration or electric vacuum aspiration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accurate Confirmation of Completed Abortion
Time Frame: 2 weeks - 6 months
Accurate confirmation of completed abortion, as determined by urine pregnancy test at following, appropriately falling serum hCG levels, or patient report of returned menses
2 weeks - 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Principal Investigator, MD, MPH, Planned Parenthood of Greater New York

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 12, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Induced Abortion

Clinical Trials on D & C abortion

Subscribe