Cognitive Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease

August 16, 2016 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

PC-based Rehabilitation of Motor Planning Deficits in Parkinson Disease

We are testing a computer game-style rehabilitation program for people with Parkinson's disease (PD). People with PD often have difficulty with motor planning, such as initiating or starting movements. We believe that our program will improve performance on a movement initiation task as well as on activities of daily living, such as walking, preparing a meal or opening a medicine bottle. We will measure brain function using functional MRI before and after training to identify brain areas that are involved in improved performance. If effective, computer based training will be an inexpensive treatment for motor planning deficits in PD that is free from side effects and easy to administer to a large number of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Our approach is to use PD-based adaptive training to improve performance on IG movement initiation in patients with PD. We have three aims, 1) to systematically evaluate cognitive rehabilitation in people with Parkinson's disease (PD), 2) to examine the neural mechanisms subserving cognitive rehabilitation in PD and 3) to assess the ecological validity of cognitive rehabilitation in PD. We will focus on a single aspect of cognitive function, the decision to initiate a movement. Movements can be internally generated (IG) or externally cued, and motor deficits in PD are typically linked to IG movements. The protocol is designed to drive beneficial neuroplastic changes using a paradigm similar to those that have shown promising results in traumatic brain injury patients. In addition, we will use fMRI to measure activity in underlying basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits. Finally, because the goal of any research regarding the pathophysiology of disease is to improve the lives of patients with the disease, behavioral and neuropsychological measures will be correlated with fMRI measured functional abnormalities before and after training. Improvement in the initiation of movement has the potential to dramatically improve daily functioning including reducing falls, improving language production and improving proficiency of activities of daily living.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of PD dominant on the right side with a Hx of response to dopamine replacement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to MRI
  • History of stroke or significant head trauma
  • Significant vision impairment
  • Hx of brain surgery or claustrophobia
  • Medication change <4 weeks
  • Atypical PD
  • Severe tremor
  • Presence of motor fluctuations or dyskinesia
  • Significantly impaired limb or joint function
  • Significant memory impairment
  • Depression or daytime sleepiness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PD Subjects
PD subjects who undergo to PC-based neurorehabilitation intervention. This intervention will train research subjects to improve movement initiation in response to visual stimuli.
Subjects sit at a computer and type a string of numbers that appears on the screen. As performance improves (# correct), the strings of numbers get longer. They are then instructed to repeat the string from memory. Performing these key entries from memory is a test of internally generated movement initiation.
Other Names:
  • training
Active Comparator: Control Subjects
Age matched controls who undergo to PC-based neurorehabilitation intervention. This intervention will train research subjects to improve movement initiation in response to visual stimuli.
Subjects sit at a computer and type a string of numbers that appears on the screen. As performance improves (# correct), the strings of numbers get longer. They are then instructed to repeat the string from memory. Performing these key entries from memory is a test of internally generated movement initiation.
Other Names:
  • training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reaction Time and Variability for Movement Task
Time Frame: time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)
Before and after computer training outcome measures: left, right, bimanual external cue reaction time; left, right, bimanual external cue error; left, right, bimanual internally generated reaction time; left, right, bimanual internally generated error for four-digit trials.
time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropsychological Measures of Cognitive Function, Including Reaction Time and Time to Completion
Time Frame: time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)

Modified Emory Functional Ambulatory Profile (mEFAP); mobility test Task 1: 5 meter walk on hard surface; timed. Task 2: 5 meter walk on carpeted surface, timed. Task 3: Timed up and go; rise from chair, walk 3 meters, walk back, sit down in chair, timed.

Task 4: Obstacle course, similar to the Timed up and go, with 2 obstacles to be stepped over while walking forward and coming back; timed.

Task 5: Ascend and descend 5 steps of stairs; timed.

time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)
Task Errors and Variability
Time Frame: time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)
Left, right and bimanual errors in external cue and internally generated tasks for four-digit trials
time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)
Functional Dexterity Test (FDT)
Time Frame: time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)

Functional Dexterity test (FDT): a motor dexterity measurement for hands. Task: Pick up and flip wooden pegs on a 4x4 pegboard in a zig-zag pattern; timed. Task is performed 2 times per hand Modified Task: Interchange 2 columns of of pegs (4 pegs each side) simultaneously. No flipping is required.

5 second penalty to time score for 1.) using the pegboard to help with flipping and 2.) supinating of the hand; per occurrence. 10 second penalty to time score for dropping a peg, per occurrence.

time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)
Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT)
Time Frame: time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)

Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT): Participants are given a key of numbers (1-9) corresponding to symbols for reference.

Task: Participants are given a page of symbols and are instructed to say aloud the number corresponding to each symbol on the page.

This task is timed for completion and the score is reported as the number of symbol to number matching correct in 90 seconds.

time of enrollment and 2 months following enrollment (before and after training)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elizabeth A Disbrow, PhD, Overton Brooks VA Medical Center, Shreveport, LA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 12, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data will be available upon request.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on PC based training

Subscribe