Influence of Age on Amyloid Load in Alzheimer's Disease and in Atypical Focal Cortical Alzheimer's Disease (BIOMAGE)

Influence of Age on amyloïd Load in Alzheimer's Disease and in Atypical Focal Cortical Alzheimer's Disease Like Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA) and Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA)Using Positron Emitting Tomography (PET) Imaging

The first objective is to asses influence of age on amyloid load measured by PET imaging using Pittsburgh B compound (PiB) radio-tracer, in Alzheimer's disease(AD). This will allow the determination of brains age-specific deterioration factors by comparing Early onset AD (EOAD), Late onset AD (LOAD)and atypical focal cortical AD (PCA and LPA). The amount of brain lesions in AD patients is estimated by:

  1. measuring the rate of cortical brain atrophy,
  2. FDG imaging of glucose metabolism reflecting neuronal activity, and
  3. for patients who benefited from a lumbar puncture; Cortical-spinal fluid (CSF) amounts of amyloïd and tau proteins are measured.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Literature data suggests there are different types of AD depending on their age of onset, called EOAD and LOAD. These two categories are distinguished by the localization of brain atrophy : severe and 'posterior' in EOAD and more 'anterior' in LOAD. Neuro-pathologic data suggests some atypical focal cortical atrophy, characterized by a respect of episodic memory, may be classified within EOAD.

PiB-based PET imaging allows the in-vivo visualization and quantification of amyloïd load.

We want to answer the question whether the amount of amyloïd protein may be lower in LOAD than EOAD in patients showing the same level of dementia, and thus identify ageing-specific cognitive disorders and understand witch factors influence etio-pathology of typical and atypical Alzheimer's disease.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ile de France
      • Paris, Ile de France, France, 75651
        • Pitié Salpétrière Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients have to fulfil criteria for (1)AD with an amnesic syndrome of the media-temporal type, EOAD have lower frequency and (2) and for atypical Ad respecting episodic memory, inaugural language disorder or visual-spatial disorder

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • AD patients: clinical dementia rating between 0.5 and 2 free and cued recall test (Grober and Buschke) cued-recall < 18/48 and total recall < 40/48
  • atypical AD : i visual-spatial disorder and respect of episodic memory progressive evolution, Balint syndrome ii progressive language disorder constituted of logopenic aphasia respect of episodic memory
  • controls: age over 30 MMSE over or equal to 27 normal neuropsychiatric state for age and education level

Exclusion Criteria:

  • for every patients : psychiatric disorders age under18 absence of social security counter indication to MRI supposed or actual alcoholism or drug addiction pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
EOAD typical AD
this cohort is constituted with early onset typical AD.
LOAD typical
this group is constituted with late onset typical AD
atypical AD
this group is constituted with atypical form of focal cortical atrophy, like posterior cortical atrophy and logopenic progressive aphasia.
young controls
under 65
old controls
over 65

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PIB-PET imaging of amyloid load
Time Frame: 0 - 2 months
PET imaging using PIB radio-tracer will give an estimation of regional amyloid load for every patient
0 - 2 months
FDG-PET imaging of glucose metabolism
Time Frame: 0 - 2 months
PET imaging using 18F-fluorodesoxyglucose (FDG) will give a visualization of regional neuronal metabolism
0 - 2 months
clinical phenotypic assessment
Time Frame: 0 - 2 months
the clinical evaluation includes a neurologic consulting, a neuropsychologic assessment of cognitive performances, and evaluation of autonomy
0 - 2 months
MRI
Time Frame: 0 - 2 months
the magnetic resonance imaging will be performed using numerous modalities like T1 weighted sequences for anatomic information, T2 weighted FLAIR and TSE sequences to avoid vascular injuries and T2 GRE to avoid microbleeds, DTI for the diffusion tensor imaging and default mode FMRI, to identify neural networks involved in default concious mode.
0 - 2 months
ApoE gene sequencing
Time Frame: 0 - 24 months after inclusion
ApoE gene sequencing, will be performed after all samples have been collected. So this may be 0 to 24 month after inclusion.
0 - 24 months after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
amyloid and Tau measurements in cerebro-spinal fluid (csf)
Time Frame: -6 months or +6months arround T0
some patients have a lumbar puncture that allows a direct quantification of CSF amyloid, tau and phospho-tau amounts.This measure is performed in the 6 months following the clinical assessment (at inclusion) and when a former puncture has already been done, it can be used retro-actively up to 6 months before clinical assessment.
-6 months or +6months arround T0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bruno Dubois, professor doctor, Inserm U975
  • Study Chair: marie c sarzin, doctor, Inserm U975

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 30, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 10, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Logopenic Progressive Aphasia

3
Subscribe