Efficacy, Safety and Efficiency Study of CARTO® 3 System Guided THERMOCOOL® Catheter Ablation Versus Fluoroscopy Guided Ablation With the Pulmonary Vein Ablation Catheter® (PVAC®) (CLARITY-AF)

January 31, 2025 updated by: Biosense Webster, Inc.

CARTO® 3 System-guided RF Ablation Using the THERMOCOOL® Catheter Versus Fluoroscopy-guided RF Ablation Using the Pulmonary Vein Ablation Catheter® (PVAC®) in Subjects With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized (2:1), Controlled, Two-arm, Unblinded Clinical Study

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety and efficiency of CARTO® 3 system guided THERMOCOOL® catheter ablation and fluoroscopy guided Pulmonary Vein Ablation Catheter® (PVAC®) guided ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized (2:1), controlled, two-arm, unblinded, clinical study, which will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of CARTO® 3 System-guided RF ablation (using the THERMOCOOL® Catheter and LASSO® Circular Mapping Catheter) compared to fluoroscopy-guided RF ablation (using the PVAC®). Patients with symptomatic PAF who meet the inclusion criteria will be considered for study participation and may be enrolled if no exclusion criteria apply.

Eligible subjects who signed the study informed consent form will be randomized into one of two treatment groups:

  • THERMOCOOL® Group: RF ablation to achieve PVI using the CARTO® 3 System, THERMOCOOL® Catheter and LASSO® Circular Mapping Catheter
  • PVAC® Group: RF ablation to achieve PVI using fluoroscopy and the PVAC®

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

79

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antwerpen, Belgium, 2020
        • A.Z. Middelheim
      • Brugge, Belgium, 8000
        • A.Z. St Jan AV
      • Ontario, Canada, L3Y 2P9
        • Southlake Regional Health Centre
    • Ontario
      • Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, L3Y2P9
        • Southlake Regional Health Centre
      • Värde, Denmark, 6800
        • Heart Center Varde
      • Köln, Germany, 51149
        • Krankenhaus Porz Cologne
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands, 5623 EJ
        • Catharina Ziekenhuis
      • Zwolle, Netherlands, 8011
        • Isala Klinieken
    • Essex
      • Basildon, Essex, United Kingdom, SS16 5NL
        • Essex Cardiothoracic Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with PAF who have had two (2) symptomatic PAF episodes in the six (6) months prior to randomization, and who are selected for catheter ablation for the treatment of their AF. Additionally patients with recurrent AF with episodes up to 30 days with sinus rhythm maintained for more than one week following cardioversion and who require PVI only for the treatment of their AF (supported by the consensus statement2). At least one AF episode should be documented either on ECG, TTM, HM or telemetry strip.
  • Failure of at least one AAD for PAF [class I or III] as evidenced by recurrent symptomatic PAF, or intolerable side effects due to the AAD.
  • Signed Patient Informed Consent Form.
  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Able and willing to comply with all pre- and follow-up testing and requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation
  • Patients with a history of any atrial flutter requiring ablation in the right atrium during the study procedure
  • Patients in whom sinus rhythm was maintained for less than 1 week after electrical cardioversion
  • Previous ablation for AF
  • LA size > 55 mm
  • LVEF < 40% (ejection fraction)
  • AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or reversible or non-cardiac cause
  • CABG procedure within the last six (6) months
  • Awaiting cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery
  • Documented left atrial thrombus on imaging (eg, TEE)
  • Diagnosed atrial myxoma
  • Women who are pregnant (by history of menstrual period or pregnancy test if the history is considered unreliable) or breastfeeding
  • Acute illness or active systemic infection or sepsis
  • Unstable angina
  • Uncontrolled heart failure
  • Myocardial infarction within the previous two (2) months
  • History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation therapy (ie. heparin or warfarin)
  • Life expectancy less than 12 months
  • Enrollment in any other study evaluating another device or drug
  • Presence of intramural thrombus, tumor or other abnormality that precludes catheter introduction or manipulation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: THERMOCOOL® group
Radiofrequency ablation to achieve PVI using the CARTO® 3 System, the THERMOCOOL® Catheter and the LASSO® Circular Mapping Catheter.
Radiofrequency Ablation procedure Application of radiofrequency energy with the THERMOCOOL® catheter used in combination with the CARTO® 3 System and the LASSO® Circular Mapping Catheter to eliminate potentials arising from the pulmonary veins.
Other Names:
  • CARTO®3 System
  • LASSO® Circular Mapping Catheter
  • THERMOCOOL® Catheter
Application of radiofrequency energy with the Pulmonary Vein Ablation Catheter® (PVAC®) to eliminate potentials arising from the pulmonary veins.
Other Names:
  • PVAC®
Active Comparator: PVAC® group
Radiofrequency ablation to achieve PVI using fluoroscopy and the PVAC®
Radiofrequency Ablation procedure Application of radiofrequency energy with the THERMOCOOL® catheter used in combination with the CARTO® 3 System and the LASSO® Circular Mapping Catheter to eliminate potentials arising from the pulmonary veins.
Other Names:
  • CARTO®3 System
  • LASSO® Circular Mapping Catheter
  • THERMOCOOL® Catheter
Application of radiofrequency energy with the Pulmonary Vein Ablation Catheter® (PVAC®) to eliminate potentials arising from the pulmonary veins.
Other Names:
  • PVAC®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freedom from documented AF/AT recurrences without new AADs
Time Frame: 1 year follow-up post-ablation
Subjects will be considered a success for the primary efficacy endpoint if the subject is free from documented recurrences of AF or AT lasting more than 30s as measured with Transtelephonic Monitoring and Standard of Care arrhythmia monitoring during a 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation.
1 year follow-up post-ablation
Incidence of PV Stenosis (number of PVs with a reduction in diameter ≥ 50% at 6 months compared to baseline per CT or MRI)
Time Frame: at 6 months post-ablation
at 6 months post-ablation
Total procedure time
Time Frame: at the time of the initial ablation procedure
at the time of the initial ablation procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute procedural success
Time Frame: at the time of the initial ablation procedure
Measured by the number (%) of subjects with confirmed entrance block at the end of the ablation procedure
at the time of the initial ablation procedure
Repeat ablation procedures for AF/AT recurrences
Time Frame: through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Measured by % of subjects undergoing repeat ablation procedures for Recurring AF/AT
through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Freedom from documented AF/AT recurrences without AAD(s)
Time Frame: through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Measured by % achieving freedom from documented AF/AT recurrences
through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Freedom from documented AF/AT recurrences with AAD(s)
Time Frame: through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Measured by % achieving freedom from documented AF/AT recurrences
through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Freedom from documented AF/AT recurrences after more than one ablation procedure
Time Frame: through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Measured by % achieving freedom from documented AF/AT recurrences
through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Freedom from documented AF recurrences without AADs
Time Frame: through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Measured by % achieving freedom from documented AF/AT recurrences
through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Freedom from documented AF recurrences with AAD(s)
Time Frame: through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Measured by % achieving freedom from documented AF/AT recurrences
through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Freedom from documented symptomatic AF/AT recurrences without new AAD(s)
Time Frame: through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Measured by % achieving freedom from documented symptomatic AF/AT recurrences
through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Freedom from documented symptomatic AF/AT recurrences with AAD(s)
Time Frame: through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
through 3-12 month follow-up period post-ablation
Incidence of any procedure-related and/or device-related adverse events occurring during the study
Time Frame: through 1 year follow-up
through 1 year follow-up
Incidence of any catheter-related adverse events
Time Frame: during 7 days follow-up post-ablation
during 7 days follow-up post-ablation
Total Fluoroscopy exposure time
Time Frame: at the time of the ablation procedure
Measured by fluoroscopy and cine-fluoroscopy time throughout procedure
at the time of the ablation procedure
Total Fluoroscopy Dose-Area Product/Source Intensifier Distance
Time Frame: at the time of the ablation procedure
at the time of the ablation procedure
Incidence of any phrenic nerve paralysis
Time Frame: through 1 year follow-up post-ablation
through 1 year follow-up post-ablation
Incidence of any symptomatic Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) or Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
Time Frame: through 1 year follow-up post-ablation
through 1 year follow-up post-ablation
Number of mapping and ablation catheters used per subject
Time Frame: through 1 year follow-up post-ablation
through 1 year follow-up post-ablation
Quality of Life (SF-36®) and Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Frequency and Severity Checklist assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Total procedure hospital visit and ablation procedure costs
Time Frame: during hospitalization stay for study treatment
during hospitalization stay for study treatment
Total number of initial or prolonged hospitalizations and unscheduled arrhythmia-related health care provider visits (including emergency department visits)
Time Frame: through 1 year follow-up post-ablation
through 1 year follow-up post-ablation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mattias Duytschaever, MD, A.Z. St Jan AV
  • Principal Investigator: Yves De Greef, MD, A.Z. Middelheim
  • Principal Investigator: Stuart Harris, MD, Essex Cardiothoracic Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Steen Hansen, MD, Heart Center Varde
  • Principal Investigator: Pepijn Van Der Voort, MD, Catharina Ziekenhuis
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Deneke, MD, Krankenhaus Porz Cologne
  • Principal Investigator: Arif Elvan, MD, Isala
  • Principal Investigator: Yaariv Khaykin, MD, Southlake Regional Health Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Atul Verma, MD, Southlake Regional Health Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

May 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency Ablation procedure

Subscribe