Comparison of Conventional and Cooled Radiofrequency of the Genicular Nerves in Patients With Chronic Knee Pain (COGENIUS)

May 22, 2023 updated by: Jan Van Zundert, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Comparison of Conventional and Cooled Radiofrequency Treatment of the Genicular Nerves Versus Sham Procedure for Patients With Chronic Knee Pain: a Multicentre, Double Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

Chronic knee pain remains a disabling disease despite current treatment strategies. There is an increase in the prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in the general population, presently affecting approximately 450,000 individuals in Belgium. A total knee replacement is a viable alternative for severe knee OA that does not respond to conservative therapy. Unfortunately, up to 53% of patients who undergo a total knee replacement develop persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP). There is currently no effective therapy for PPSP.

A radiofrequency (RF) treatment applies high frequency current on the nerve responsible for pain conduction, resulting in an interruption of the transmission of pain. This can be applied to the nerves innervating the knee joint - the superolateral, superomedial and inferomedial genicular nerves - and could be an alternative, minimally invasive treatment for patients with knee OA who fail conservative treatments and for patients with PPSP. Data from the recent literature indicates that this treatment leads to a reduction of pain intensity and could result in an improvement of knee function, of the psychological state of the individual, and finally in an increase in health-related quality of life. Furthermore, RF of the genicular nerves could help avoid or delay a total knee replacement therefore potentially contributing to cost reduction. Both cooled and conventional RF treatments are reported in the literature to improve pain. The use of water to cool the RF electrodes results in an increased lesion size by removing heat from adjacent tissue, allowing power delivery to be increased. As a consequence, cooled RF could result in a higher chance of success and longer duration of effect. Until now, the studies performed on cooled RF are industry initiated and a direct comparison between conventional, cooled and a sham procedure is lacking.

The aim of the COGENIUS trial is to investigate the effect of the two types of RF treatment on individuals experiencing chronic knee pain that is resistant to conservative treatments. For this purpose, the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of cooled and conventional RF will be compared to a sham procedure in patients suffering from knee OA and PPSP after total knee replacement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this three-arm, pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, double blind, randomised sham-controlled trial of approximately 4 years duration, 400 patients with chronic moderate to severe anterior knee pain (>12 months) refractory to conventional treatments will be included. Two groups of chronic knee pain patients will be enrolled depending on the aetiology of knee pain: OA and PPSP. Each patient will undergo a run-in period of 1 to 3 months depending on the previous treatments of the patient. A run-in period is added to the trial to guarantee that conservative treatment is performed in an optimal way before randomisation. In each group (osteoarthritis and persistent post-surgical pain), non-responders to the run-in period will be randomly allocated to a conventional RF intervention of the genicular nerves, a cooled RF intervention of the genicular nerves or a sham procedure in a 2:2:1 ratio. The patients will be followed up for a period of 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jan Van Zundert
  • Phone Number: +32 (0)89 32.52.54
  • Email: cogenius@zol.be

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Charlotte Claes
  • Phone Number: +32 (0)89 21.20.85
  • Email: cogenius@zol.be

Study Locations

      • Antwerpen, Belgium, 2650
        • Recruiting
        • UZ Antwerpen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Babak Baheri
      • Brasschaat, Belgium, 2930
        • Active, not recruiting
        • AZ Klina
      • Brussel, Belgium, 1070
        • Recruiting
        • ULB Erasme
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Turgay Tuna
      • Brussel, Belgium, 1200
        • Active, not recruiting
        • UCL Saint-Luc
      • Genk, Belgium, 3600
        • Recruiting
        • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg AV
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thibaut Vanneste
      • Gent, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • AZ Maria Middelares
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pieter Vander Cruysse
      • Hasselt, Belgium, 3500
        • Recruiting
        • Jessa Ziekenhuis
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michiel Brands
      • Kortrijk, Belgium, 8500
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Az Groeninge
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Recruiting
        • UZ Leuven
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bart Morlion
      • Liège, Belgium, 4000
        • Recruiting
        • CHR de la Citadelle
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Caroline Dresse
      • Liège, Belgium, 4000
        • Active, not recruiting
        • CHU Liège
      • Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
        • Recruiting
        • AZ Delta
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Karel Hanssens
      • Turnhout, Belgium, 2300
        • Recruiting
        • Az Turnhout
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christophe Lebrun
      • Arnhem, Netherlands, 6815 AD
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Rijnstate
      • Maastricht, Netherlands, 6229 HX
        • Recruiting
        • MUMC
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Micha Sommer

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed written informed consent must be obtained before any study assessment is performed.
  • Adult patients (Age ≥ 18 years old).
  • Chronic anterior knee pain (> 12 months) that is moderate to severe (defined as NRS > 4 on most or all days for the index knee either constantly or with motion at time of screening and, an average NRS score reported in the patient diary >4 at the end of the run-in period).
  • Unresponsive (meaning insufficient pain reduction or intolerance) to conventional treatments ongoing for at least 12 months prior to inclusion. Conventional treatments must include all of the following: active physiotherapy, pharmacological treatment of pain and intra-articular corticosteroid infiltration.
  • Only for patients with Osteoarthritis (OA): Radiologic confirmation of knee osteoarthritis of grade 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 12 months prior to the screening for the index knee according the Kellgren Lawrence criteria diagnosed by an independent radiologist with experience in musculoskeletal imaging on radiography (Rx) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). If imaging will need to be performed at screening it is recommended to perform an MRI instead of Rx. Imaging with MRI will enable the independent radiologist to perform a better estimation of the grade of OA.
  • Only for patients with Persistent Post-Surgical Pain (PPSP) after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): Patients with PPSP* after TKA need to have had a negative orthopaedic work-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Local or systemic infection (bacteraemia).
  • Evidence of inflammatory arthritis or an inflammatory systemic disease responsible for knee pain.
  • Intra-articular injections (steroids, hyaluronic acid, platelet enriched plasma, ...) in the index knee during the 3 months prior to procedure.
  • Pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant before the study intervention. Participants who become pregnant after the study intervention during the follow-up period will not be excluded.
  • Chronic widespread pain.
  • Patients with unstable psychosocial disorder.
  • Allergies to products used during the procedure (lidocaine, propofol, chlorhexidine).
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy defined as supratherapeutic dose of anticoagulation medication.
  • Uncontrolled immune suppression.
  • Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent.
  • Patient is currently implanted with a neurostimulator.
  • Current radicular pain in index leg.
  • Previous conventional or cooled radiofrequency of the index knee.
  • Patients with bilateral knee pain defined as chronic knee pain (> 12 months) in both knees that is moderate to severe (defined as a numeric rating scale (NRS) > 4 on most or all days either constantly or with motion) and that is unresponsive (meaning insufficient pain reduction or intolerance) to conventional treatments ongoing for at least 12 months prior to inclusion. Conventional treatments must include all of the following: active physiotherapy, pharmacological treatment of pain and intra-articular corticosteroid infiltration.
  • Patients who have a planned TKA in the near future defined as patients who already have agreed on a date for the TKA procedure.
  • Patients who are unwilling or mentally incapable to complete the study questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Radiofrequency of the genicular nerves
In the conventional radiofrequency group a intervention of 80°C at the tip is applied during 90 seconds at each nerve (superolateral, superomedial and inferomedial genicular nerves). The probe stays in place for 150 seconds at each nerve so that the time needed for each procedure is similar.
Conventional Radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves of the knee blocks the transmission of painful stimuli from the sensory genicular nerves of the knee to the central nervous system by means of a thermal lesion created using RF current.
Other Names:
  • Conventional Radiofrequency ablation
Active Comparator: Cooled Radiofrequency of the genicular nerves
In the cooled radiofrequency group a intervention of 60°C measured at the tip and on average 80°C in the targeted tissue is applied for 150 seconds using the Cooled RF system at each nerve (superolateral, superomedial and inferomedial genicular nerves).
Cooled RF treatment causes a larger lesion size compared to conventional RF by means of internal cooling of the probe.
Other Names:
  • Cooled Radiofrequency ablation
Sham Comparator: Sham procedure
In the sham group a 18 gauge introducer and probe will be placed but no RF intervention will be applied. The generator will be turned on without connection to the probe for 150 seconds and the sound of the generator will be mimicked with a recording. The position of the needle will not be checked by fluoroscopy; however, the intervention team will position the fluoroscopy arm and mention the acquisition of the fluoroscopic image to the patient. This way no unnecessary radiation is used.
Sham procedure with placing of needles subcutaneously.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months post-intervention
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention.

The primary endpoint is the WOMAC score (range 0-96) at 6 months post-intervention.

The WOMAC score is derived from a self-administered osteoarthritis-specific validated questionnaire on pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the knee joint.The lower the score, the lower the osteoarthritis-specific symptoms are.

6 months post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score.
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
The WOMAC score (range 0-96) is derived from a self-administered osteoarthritis-specific validated questionnaire on pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the knee joint.The lower the score, the lower the osteoarthritis-specific symptoms are.
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
Pain Intentisty
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
Pain intensity expressed by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0-10). The NRS score at each visit will be calculated as the mean score of the 4 days prior to each visit.The lower the score, the least pain the patient experiences.
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
The proportion of patients with a pain reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline expressed by the numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
The proportion of patients with a pain reduction of at least 50% compared to baseline expressed by the numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10). The NRS score at each visit will be calculated as the mean score of the 4 days prior to each visit.The lower the score, the least pain the patient experiences.
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
Health-related quality of life assessed by the EuroQoL-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L). The questionnaire consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and a visual assessment scale. Responses to the 5 items (one for each dimension) result in a patient's health state that can be transformed into a utility score ranging between 0 (death) and 1 (full health), representing the quality of life of the health state. For the visual assessment scale section, the patient indicates their impression of health on the visual scale. The scale has the following distribution: 0 indicating "worse possible health" and 100 indicating "best possible health".
1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
Goniometry
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
Goniometry (maximal knee flexion and extension expressed in degrees) is assessed using the CJOrtho app. The degrees range from 0 to 180 degrees.
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
'Timed up and Go' test
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
The 'Timed up and Go' test assesses the physical functioning of the patient.
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
The 6-minute walk test
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
The 6-minute walk test assesses the physical functioning of the patient. The distance in meters covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity.
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post-intervention.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) assesses and detect anxiety and depression in patients with physical health problems. The questionnaire consists of 14 items: 7 items to measure anxiety and 7 items to measure depression.
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) assesses the mental health of the patient.The 13 item questionnaire consists of 3 subscales (magnification, rumination and helplessness) and asks patients to reflect on past painful experiences and to indicate the degree on which they experiences each of 13 thoughts of feelings on a 5- point scale (0 not at all and 4 all the time).
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
Patients' Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale is a self-reported measure that reflects the patient's belief about the treatment efficacy. The patient is asked to rate the efficacy of the treatment on a scale of 1 (much better) to 7 (much worse).
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
Patient's satisfaction
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
Patient's satisfaction assessed by 7-point Likert scale with 0 representing total dissatisfaction and 10 representing maximal satisfaction.
1-, 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
Medication use
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
Medication use measured by Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS III).It computes a single numeric value for a patient's pain medication profile. This number is used to track pain levels through a treatment course or research study.
1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
Opioid dependence
Time Frame: 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
The patient is strong opioid dependent if the patient takes an opioid analgesic with the exception of analgesics with tramadol or codeine.
1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 24-months post- intervention.
Incidence of related adverse events
Time Frame: Follow-up until 24-months post- intervention.
The incidence of related adverse events. Active capture during each study contact to assess specific symptoms and adverse events relevant to chronic knee pain or RF intervention.
Follow-up until 24-months post- intervention.
Health care resource utilisation
Time Frame: Follow-up until 24-months post- intervention.
The health care resource use questions are created for the COGENIUS study to collect information regarding the visits to a medical specialist (doctor or nurse) or general practitioner as a result of knee pain.
Follow-up until 24-months post- intervention.
Productivity loss due to sickness
Time Frame: Follow-up until 24-months post- intervention.
Productivity loss due to sickness assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI). Productivity loss due to sickness refers to output loss resulting from work absence and/or reduced labour input due to sickness. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes.
Follow-up until 24-months post- intervention.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phenotype of patients suffering from Persistent Post-Surgical Pain (PPSP)
Time Frame: Baseline
Demographic data collected at baseline will be used to phenotype patients suffering from PPSP.
Baseline
Time to additional interventions
Time Frame: Follow-up until 24-months post- intervention.
Time to additional interventions at each time point. Interventions will be divided in minimally invasive interventions (intraarticular (IA) steroid injections, IA hyaluronic acid, platelet rich plasma of infiltrations, repeat RF of the genicular nerves) and surgery (primary/revision total knee arthroplasty and other knee related surgery) during the follow-up.
Follow-up until 24-months post- intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COGENIUS
  • Z-2021109 (Other Identifier: Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg)
  • KCE20-1255 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Belgium Health Care Knowledge Centre)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Researcher will need to contact ctu@zol.be in order to request the 'Data Sharing Application' form. Users will need to complete an application form, 'Request for Data Sharing'. The application will be reviewed by the Trial Steering Committee with regard to feasibility and confidentiality. When the application is approved by the Trial Steering Committee, the applicant will be requested to sign a 'Data Use Agreement'. This Data Use Agreement shall be countersigned by ZOL as Sponsor and the CI of the COGENIUS study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Considering that ongoing research contributing to the completion of datasets must not be compromised by premature or opportunistic sharing and analysis of data, ZOL will not release the data of its studies until the primary study results have been published, unless authorized for release has been granted.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Conventional Radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves

3
Subscribe