Implementation and Evaluation of the COTiD Program in the Netherlands

Implementation and Evaluation of an Effective Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia (COTiD) Program

The main purpose of this cluster randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the difference in effectiveness between a combined implementation strategy and an educational strategy on the implementation of a community occupational therapy program for clients with dementia and their primary caregivers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dementia is associated with a major decrease in quality of life of clients and their caregivers and a major driver of costs in health care. Recently, evidence was found for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a community-based occupational therapy (OT) intervention for older adults with dementia and their caregivers (COTiD program). This intervention resulted in significant improvements in both clients' and caregivers' daily functioning, quality of life, mood and health status. In addition, caregivers experienced an increased sense of competence.

Currently occupational therapists (OTs) are trained in using the program during a 3-day course. In a pilot implementation study it was found that this course was not effective enough as only 20% of the OTs actually used the COTiD program in practice because of a lack of implementation skills, feedback and organisational barriers. In order to increase the use of this program and increase the quality of care a new implementation strategy is developed. This combined implementation strategy provides the OTs with two implementation training days, coaching on the job, regional meetings, discussion platform, web-based registration system and newsletters. In addition physicians and managers are provided with extra information on the COTiD program.

The current study is designed primarily to evaluate the following research questions:

  • What is the difference in adherence to the community OT guideline in dementia between OTs receiving the combined implementation strategy and OTs receiving the educational strategy?
  • What is the difference in community OT use(referral rate + actual provision of OT) between clusters provided with the combined implementation strategy and clusters provided with the educational strategy?
  • What is the difference in cost-effectiveness between the combined implementation strategy and the educational strategy with regard to adherence of OTs to the community OT guideline?

In addition the effect of the implementation strategies on patient and caregiver outcomes will also be measured.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500 HB
        • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare) (and 45 Dutch organisation)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Because of the clustered design, there are inclusion and exclusion criteria for clusters as well as for clients with dementia and their caregivers.A cluster is a unit that exists of at least one occupational therapist, one physician, and one manager.

Criteria for clusters

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The organization provides outpatient OT.
  • The organization expects that they will be able to include a minimum of 8 clients in the study.
  • There are at least two OTs, one manager, and one physician willing and able to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The organization does not provide OT or outpatient treatment and is not allowed to refer to OT services in their area that do provide community OT.
  • Less than 8 clients are available per year to refer to the OT.
  • Physicians, managers or OTs are not willing to participate
  • Members of the board of directors responsible for the organization do not agree to participate

Criteria for client with dementia and their informal caregiver

Inclusion Criteria for clients and informal caregivers:

  • Client has mild to moderate dementia (MMSE score 10-24, DSM IV criteria for dementia)
  • Client lives at home
  • Client has an informal caregiver who takes care of the client at least twice a week

Exclusion criteria for clients:

  • Client is in a severe stage of dementia
  • Client has a depression (GDS (version 30) >12)
  • Client has severe behavioral or psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD)
  • Client has a severe illness at the time of inclusion

Exclusion criteria for informal caregivers:

  • The caregiver is not able to participate in the OT treatment (e.g. due to illness).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 3-day post-graduate course
3-day post-graduate course on the use of the COTiD program in clinical practice

A 3-day course in using the COTiD program in clinical practice. The 3 days are not provided uninterrupted but there are at least two weeks between each day to provide time to practice with the guideline (for discussion on the 2nd day).

The course consists of theory on the content of the guideline and its effectiveness, Practice parts of the guideline by rol playing, and discussing each others skills through watching video material.

Other Names:
  • educational strategy
Experimental: Combined implementation strategy
The combined implementation strategy

The combined implementation strategy provides strategies for occupational therapists (OTs), physicians, and managers.

OTs receive:

  • 3-day post-graduate course
  • 2 extra training days: Lectures and skills practice focused on using the COTiD program and promoting the use of the program within their organization and network.
  • Coaching on the job: Barriers to using the COTiD program in practice are discussed using motivational interviewing.
  • Discussion platform
  • Web-based registration system: Provides guidance in using the COTiD program for every individual client.
  • Regional meetings: successes and difficulties in using the COTiD are discussed.

Managers and physicians receive:

  • Information on the COTiD program through a website and newsletters.
  • Motivational reminders.
Other Names:
  • implementation training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence of occupational therapists to the COTiD program
Time Frame: one year (baseline, T1, and T2)
Adherence is measured using vignettes. Vignettes are realistic case descriptions about which occupational therapists are asked to answer open ended questions.
one year (baseline, T1, and T2)
Community occupational therapy use according to the COTiD program
Time Frame: one year

Community OT use reflects:

  • How many people with dementia were referred to OT services in total
  • How many people with dementia were referred specifically to OT according to the COTiD program.
one year
Costs of the implementation strategies
Time Frame: October 2009 - December 2011

The following cost data is collected:

Costs of the implementation strategies

  • Costs made by the OTs, managers, and physicians receiving the combined implementation strategy.
  • Costs made by the OTs receiving only the educational strategy.
  • Development and execution costs of the combined implementation strategy.
  • development and execution costs of the educational strategy.

Costs made buy the cliënt and caregiver

  • Costs made by client and caregiver (using the RUD Lite instrument)regarding healthcare consumption
  • Time the caregiver spends om informal care
October 2009 - December 2011

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge of the healthcare professionals about the COTiD program
Time Frame: one year (baseline, T1, and T2)
measured using a multiple choice knowledge test on the most important aspects of the COTiD program.
one year (baseline, T1, and T2)
COTiD program treatment outcome on client and caregiver level
Time Frame: one year (baseline, T1, and T2)

The following outcomes are evaluated:

  • Clients'processing skills (Assessment of Motor and Process Skills)
  • Need for assistance in daily activities (Interview of Deterioration of Daily Activities in Dementia)
  • Caregivers Sense of Competence (Sense of Competense Questionnaire)
  • Client and caregiver quality of life (EQ5D and Dementia Quality of Life Scale)
  • Client and caregiver self-perceived performance and satisfaction (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure)
one year (baseline, T1, and T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Maud Graff, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2010

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on 3-day post-graduate course

3
Subscribe