Pulsatile Perfusion Preservation in Kidney Transplantation From Expanded Criteria Donors (IMPULSION)

May 29, 2017 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Interest of Pulsatile Perfusion Preservation on Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation From Expanded Criteria Donors

Our hypothesis is that the Waters Medical® pulsatile perfusion machine (RM 3) is a way to improve delayed graft function (DGF) in marginal grafts, and some perfusion profiles (flow, pressure, resistance index, venous effluent pH) are correlated with better recovery of renal function (without dialysis during the first week after transplant).

Observation or Investigation Method Used :

The study is multicenter, prospective, open, controlled and randomized:grafts are divided into two parallel groups:

  • group 1 corresponds to a conservation of grafts in static incubation
  • group 2 corresponds to conservation using a pulsatile perfusion machine

Duration and Organizational Arrangements for Research :

The total duration of the study is planned for 36 months. This duration includes:

  • an inclusion period that will last 24 months,
  • the follow-up of recipient patients from the day of transplantation until twelve months after the operation

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

162

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69437
        • Service d'Urologie et Chirurgie de la Tranplantation - Hôpital Edourad Herriot

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for marginal graft:

  • donors over 60 years of age
  • donors between 50 and 60 years of age with at least one of the following characteristics :

    • history of diabetes mellitus
    • history of high blood pressure
    • serum creatinine >1,5 mg/dL
    • death by stroke (haemorrhagic or thrombotic)

Inclusion criteria for recipient :

  • patients registered on the kidney transplant waiting list likely to receive a marginal kidney
  • immunized patients whose anti-HLA antibody specificities have been determined

Exclusion Criteria for recipient:

  • pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • people who have been incarcerated
  • minors
  • adults under guardianship
  • people who are not affiliated with the French healthcare system
  • people with HLA immunization whose HLA antibody specificities have not been determined

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Static incubation
If conservation in static incubation (group 1) is chosen by random selection, the transplant should be carried out while keeping the cold ischemic time (CIT) as short as possible (preferably less than 18 hours). Keep in mind that for reasons of homogeneity for result analysis and for conservation quality, it is recommended that kidneys in group 1 be conserved in University of Wisconsin (eg, UW, Belzer® or Viaspan®), IGL-1, or SCOT solution.

Kidneys in this group are conserved in University of Wisconsin (eg, UW, Belzer® or Viaspan®), IGL-1, or SCOT solution before being transplanted.

.

Experimental: Pulsatile perfusion
If conservation in a pulsatile perfusion machine (group 2) is chosen by random selection, the kidney will be placed in the perfusion machine within two hours and should be kept there at least 6 hours and 8 hours if possible, before being transplanted
Kidneys in this group are placed in the pulsatile perfusion machine(RM 3) within two hours and should be kept there at least 6 hours and 8 hours if possible, before being transplanted

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Delayed graft function (DGF) rate defined as the need to resort to dialysis during the first week after transplantation. The main dialysis factors retained are hydrosodic and/or hyperkalemic overload.
Time Frame: First week after transplantation
First week after transplantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Evaluate improvement in the glomerular filtering rate
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Evaluate the recourse to dialysis
Time Frame: 3 months following transplantation
3 months following transplantation
Evaluate the proportion of functional grafts (which allows for renal purification without recourse to dialysis)
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Evaluate patient survival
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Stratify the analysis of regaining function and graft survival using Nyberg's classification in order to determine which risk groups would most benefit from pulsatile perfusion.
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Identify perfusion profiles of the machine, which predict regaining renal function (absence of dialysis during the week after transplantation) and graft survival
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation
Evaluate the medico-economic impact of each conservation strategy in the management of patients who will benefit from marginal grafts
Time Frame: 12 months after transplantation
12 months after transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 27, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Renal Failure

Clinical Trials on Static incubation

Subscribe