Distal Locking Using an Electromagnetic Field Guided Computer Based Real Time System for Orthopaedic Trauma Patients (Sure Shot)

Hypothesis: Utilization of the "wand" method will enhance improvements in drill placement, locking nail placement during tibia and femur fracture repairs, and offer less radiation exposure and less operative time. The purpose of this research study is to compare the efficacy of distal locking of intramedullary nails using a standard free-hand technique with the guided wand technique. Distal locking is the placement of screws through the intramedullary rod to hold it in place and prevent rotation. Currently, the free-hand technique is most often utilized. With this technique, the surgeon uses intraoperative x-rays in order to find the holes in the intramedullary rod to place the screws. The wand technique uses electromagnetic fields rather than x-rays to find these screw holes. The utilization of the wand technique could result in improvements in drill placement and locking nail placement as well as decrease operative time and radiation exposure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Methods and Measures Patients 18 years of age and older presenting through the emergency room at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center with tibial and femoral fractures suitable for operative repair will be prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria will include any patient with a tibia fracture or femur fracture requiring intramedullary nailing. Retrograde intramedullary nails will be excluded as will nails which are not interlocked. The goal for enrollment is 24 tibial and 24 femoral fractures. Data including operative time, C-arm time, and "nail misses" will be obtained in the operating room for 24 tibial and 24 femoral nails. Surgeons who perform the procedure will have had experience using the freehand technique and will be trained with the guided wand prior to the experiment. Locking will be performed with the freehand and the wand technique in alternating order for the two interlocking screws. The order of which technique is utilized first will be randomly assigned. All procedures will be timed, and fluoroscopy time, radiation time, and any "nail misses" will be documented. All tibial nails will be locked with 2 mediolateral screws and all femurs with 2 lateral to medial screws.

Patients will receive follow-up for complications for a 6 month period after surgical procedure. Intervals of follow-up will be at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Anterior-posterior and lateral images will be performed as are already customary and usual at these time intervals.

Outcome Measure(s) The goal is to prospectively assess the "wand" technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement which reduced operative time, C-arm exposure and inadvertent "nail misses." Additionally, it is expected that there will exist no complications related to the use of this technique.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences - CompRehab

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years and older with tibial or femoral fracture suitable for operative repair with intramedullary nailing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fractures requiring repair by retrograde intramedullary nails and interlocking nails.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Free-hand technique
Free-hand technique utilized to find screw holes.
Free-hand technique utilizes x-rays to find screw holes.
Other: Wand technique
Wand technique is utilized to find screw holes.
Wand technique is utilized to find screw holes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduced operative time.
Time Frame: Six months post surgery
The goal is to prospectively assess the "wand" technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement which reduces operative time.
Six months post surgery
Reduced C-arm exposure
Time Frame: Six months post surgery
The goal is to prospectively assess the "wand" technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement, which reduces C-arm exposure.
Six months post surgery
Reduces inadvertent nail misses.
Time Frame: Six months post surgery
The goal is to prospectively assess the "wand" technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement, which reduces inadvertent "nail misses."
Six months post surgery
No complications
Time Frame: Six months post surgery
The goal is to prospectively assess the "wand" technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement. It is expected that there will exist no complications related to the use of this technique.
Six months post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Riyaz H. Jinnah, MD, FRCS, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
  • Principal Investigator: Eben A. Carroll, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Femoral Fractures

Clinical Trials on free-hand

Subscribe