Lyrica (Pregabalin) Korean Post Marketing Surveillance Study

Post Marketing Surveillance Study For Observing Safety And Efficacy Of Lyrica

This study collects post-marketing safety and efficacy surveillance data in real world clinical use of pregabalin for its approved indications in Korea.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

continuous patients with target disorders in collaborating institutions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

4175

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Korean adult patients with epilepsy, neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia, prescribed pregabalin for within label use

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient treated with pregabalin for an approved indication by Korean Food and Drug Administration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-consenting
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients
  • galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Ecologic or Community
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Fibromyalgia
Pregabalin treatment can be started with a dose of 150 mg per day. Based on individual subject response and tolerability, the dosage may be increased to 300 mg per day after 1 week. The maximum dosage of 600 mg per day may be achieved after an additional week.

Peripheral neuropathic pain: Pregabalin treatment can be started at a dose of 150 mg per day. Based on individual subject response and tolerability, the dosage may be increased to 300 mg per day after an interval of 3 to 7 days, and if needed, to a maximum dose of 600 mg per day after an additional 7-day interval.

Central neuropathic pain: Pregabalin treatment can be started at a dose of 150 mg per day. Based on individual subject response and tolerability, the dosage may be increased to 300 mg per day after an interval of 1 week, and if needed, to a maximum dose of 600 mg per day after an additional 1 week interval. In case that tolerability could not be shown in the targeted daily dose, dose reduction may be considered.

The recommended dose of pregabalin for fibromyalgia is 300 to 450 mg/day. Dosing should begin at 75 mg two times a day (150 mg/day) and may be increased to 150 mg two times a day (300 mg/day) within 1 week based on efficacy and tolerability. Subjects who do not experience sufficient benefit with 300 mg/day may be further increased to 225 mg two times a day (450 mg/day). Treatment with doses above 450 mg/day is not recommended.
Epilepsy
Pregabalin treatment can be started with a dose of 150 mg per day. Based on individual subject response and tolerability, the dosage may be increased to 300 mg per day after 1 week. The maximum dosage of 600 mg per day may be achieved after an additional week.

Peripheral neuropathic pain: Pregabalin treatment can be started at a dose of 150 mg per day. Based on individual subject response and tolerability, the dosage may be increased to 300 mg per day after an interval of 3 to 7 days, and if needed, to a maximum dose of 600 mg per day after an additional 7-day interval.

Central neuropathic pain: Pregabalin treatment can be started at a dose of 150 mg per day. Based on individual subject response and tolerability, the dosage may be increased to 300 mg per day after an interval of 1 week, and if needed, to a maximum dose of 600 mg per day after an additional 1 week interval. In case that tolerability could not be shown in the targeted daily dose, dose reduction may be considered.

The recommended dose of pregabalin for fibromyalgia is 300 to 450 mg/day. Dosing should begin at 75 mg two times a day (150 mg/day) and may be increased to 150 mg two times a day (300 mg/day) within 1 week based on efficacy and tolerability. Subjects who do not experience sufficient benefit with 300 mg/day may be further increased to 225 mg two times a day (450 mg/day). Treatment with doses above 450 mg/day is not recommended.
Neuropathic Pain
Pregabalin treatment can be started with a dose of 150 mg per day. Based on individual subject response and tolerability, the dosage may be increased to 300 mg per day after 1 week. The maximum dosage of 600 mg per day may be achieved after an additional week.

Peripheral neuropathic pain: Pregabalin treatment can be started at a dose of 150 mg per day. Based on individual subject response and tolerability, the dosage may be increased to 300 mg per day after an interval of 3 to 7 days, and if needed, to a maximum dose of 600 mg per day after an additional 7-day interval.

Central neuropathic pain: Pregabalin treatment can be started at a dose of 150 mg per day. Based on individual subject response and tolerability, the dosage may be increased to 300 mg per day after an interval of 1 week, and if needed, to a maximum dose of 600 mg per day after an additional 1 week interval. In case that tolerability could not be shown in the targeted daily dose, dose reduction may be considered.

The recommended dose of pregabalin for fibromyalgia is 300 to 450 mg/day. Dosing should begin at 75 mg two times a day (150 mg/day) and may be increased to 150 mg two times a day (300 mg/day) within 1 week based on efficacy and tolerability. Subjects who do not experience sufficient benefit with 300 mg/day may be further increased to 225 mg two times a day (450 mg/day). Treatment with doses above 450 mg/day is not recommended.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving 28 Days Seizure Free Period in Intent-to Treat (ITT) Population
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 12
Participants were regarded as seizure-free if no seizures (partial or other) were reported for the participant during the period of 28 days in the study.
Baseline through Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving 28 Days Seizure Free Period in Per Protocol (PP) Population
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 12
Participants were regarded as seizure-free if no seizures (partial or other) were reported for the participant during the period of 28 days in the study.
Baseline through Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Seizure Frequency in ITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 12
Percentage of participants with improvement in seizure frequency of greater than or equal to 75%; greater than or equal to 50% to 74%; 0% to 49% were considered.
Baseline through Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Seizure Frequency in PP Population
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 12
Percentage of participants with improvement in seizure frequency of greater than or equal to 75%; greater than or equal to 50% to 74%; 0% to 49% were considered.
Baseline through Week 12
Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Score for NeP in ITT Population at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
Daily Pain Rating Score (DPRS): participant rated 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates greater level of pain.
Baseline and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Score for NeP in PP Population at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
DPRS: participant rated 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates greater level of pain.
Baseline and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Score for Fibromyalgia in ITT Population at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
DPRS: participant rated 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates greater level of pain.
Baseline and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Daily Pain Score for Fibromyalgia in PP Population at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
DPRS: participant rated 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates greater level of pain.
Baseline and Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Sleep Interference Score for NeP in ITT Population at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
Daily Sleep Interference Score (DSIS): participant rated 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interferes with sleep) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates a greater level of sleep disturbance. Self-assessment performed daily on awakening prior to taking study medication.
Baseline and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Sleep Interference Score for NeP in PP Population at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
DSIS: participant rated 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interferes with sleep) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates a greater level of sleep disturbance. Self-assessment performed daily on awakening prior to taking study medication.
Baseline and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Sleep Interference Score for Fibromyalgia in ITT Population at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
DSIS: participant rated 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interferes with sleep) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates a greater level of sleep disturbance. Self-assessment performed daily on awakening prior to taking study medication.
Baseline and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Sleep Interference Score for Fibromyalgia in PP Population at Week 6
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 6
DSIS: participant rated 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interferes with sleep) during past 24-hour period. Higher score indicates a greater level of sleep disturbance. Self-assessment performed daily on awakening prior to taking study medication.
Baseline and Week 6
Number of Participants With Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Scale for NeP in ITT Population
Time Frame: Week 6
CGIC: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (a little improved), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse), 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale. Higher score is equal to more affected.
Week 6
Number of Participants With CGIC Scale for NeP in PP Population
Time Frame: Week 6
CGIC: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (a little improved), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse), 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale. Higher score is equal to more affected.
Week 6
Number of Participants With Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale for NeP in ITT Population
Time Frame: Week 6
PGIC was defined as participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (a little improved), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse) , 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale. Higher score is equal to more affected.
Week 6
Number of Participants With PGIC Scale for NeP in PP Population
Time Frame: Week 6
PGIC was defined as participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (a little improved), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse) , 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale. Higher score is equal to more affected.
Week 6
Number of Participants With CGIC Scale for Fibromyalgia in ITT Population
Time Frame: Week 6
CGIC: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (a little improved), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse), 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale. Higher score is equal to more affected.
Week 6
Number of Participants With CGIC Scale for Fibromyalgia in PP Population
Time Frame: Week 6
CGIC: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (a little improved), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse), 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale. Higher score is equal to more affected.
Week 6
Number of Participants With PGIC Scale for Fibromyalgia in ITT Population
Time Frame: Week 6
PGIC was defined as participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (a little improved), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse) , 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale. Higher score is equal to more affected.
Week 6
Number of Participants With PGIC Scale for Fibromyalgia in PP Population
Time Frame: Week 6
PGIC was defined as participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (a little improved), 4 (no change), 5 (a little worse) , 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale. Higher score is equal to more affected.
Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on pregabalin (Lyrica)

3
Subscribe