- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01239836
Effectiveness of Continence Promotion Interventions Among Community-dwelling Older Women
May 14, 2013 updated by: Cara Tannenbaum, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal
Self-management, Constructivism or Both as Knowledge Transfer Strategies for Reducing the Cost and Impact of Urinary Incontinence Among Community-dwelling Senior Women in the United Kingdom
Urinary incontinence is a common and bothersome condition that remains frequently untreated among senior women.
The aim of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of two community-based continence promotion interventions aimed at improving rates of self-care and/or professional health-care seeking in older women with urinary incontinence.
The main hypothesis posits that participation in a constructivist interactive workshop combined with use of an evidence-based self-management tool will yield rates of improvement in incontinence frequency and reduce the cost of pad use by 20% compared to either intervention alone, which individually are expected to yield minimal effect sizes of at least 0.3 compared to a sham intervention.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
The research design is a 2x2 factorial open-label cluster randomised controlled trial.
The cluster (unit of randomization) is at the level of each local community senior's group, from whence participants will be recruited.
Incontinent community-dwelling older women aged 60 years and older who have not sought care for their urinary symptoms in the last two years, but who experience incontinence at least twice weekly will be recruited through local community organizations.
Eligible participants from each local community centre will be randomly assigned as a group to one of four interventions.
The first intervention is participation in an interactive constructivist continence workshop.
The second intervention involves receipt of an evidence-based self-management tool for incontinence.
The third group will receive both interventions.
The fourth group will act as the control group: they will simply be asked about their urinary symptoms and given a general talk on women's health.
At the end of the study, the control group will be offered the self-management tool.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
259
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Middlesex
-
Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom, UB8 3PH
- Brunel University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female
- 60 years or older
- Urinary incontinence twice weekly
- Women who have not sought medical advice for incontinence symptoms in the last 2 years.
- Fluent in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women who have received treatment for their urinary incontinence within the past two years from a health care provider with expertise in urinary incontinence management (i.e. nurse practitioners/physicians/surgeons who have a clinical practice that focuses on treating urinary incontinence).
- Women started on medications for urinary incontinence (i.e. antimuscarinic medication) within the 6 months prior to enrolment.
- Women with a history of a neurological condition (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis and spinal cord injury) because they require further investigation. Women identified to have these historical findings will be advised to speak to their physician immediately about their incontinence and the possible need for investigation.
- Women who do not consent to participate.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: FACTORIAL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Self-management
|
Participants will receive a customized evidence-based risk factor modification self-management tool targeting up to 6 risk factors and associated therapeutic strategies.
The six risk factors are pelvic floor muscle weakness, consumption of caffeinated drinks, obesity, constipation, vision loss and smoking.
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: General Health Lecture
|
Participants will attend a lecture on general women's health issues that does not address urinary incontinence.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Combined workshop and self-management
|
Participants will receive a customized evidence-based risk factor modification self-management tool targeting up to 6 risk factors and associated therapeutic strategies.
The six risk factors are pelvic floor muscle weakness, consumption of caffeinated drinks, obesity, constipation, vision loss and smoking.
A one hour interactive group workshop aimed at contradicting commonly held beliefs and maladaptive practices about incontinence.
The interactive continence workshop was designed to create cognitive dissonance and challenge these beliefs and practices, as well as to promote more effective therapeutic strategies for correcting urine leakage.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Workshop
|
A one hour interactive group workshop aimed at contradicting commonly held beliefs and maladaptive practices about incontinence.
The interactive continence workshop was designed to create cognitive dissonance and challenge these beliefs and practices, as well as to promote more effective therapeutic strategies for correcting urine leakage.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Incontinence frequency
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Reductions in incontinence frequency as indicated on a 72-hour voiding diary at 3-months post-intervention compared to baseline.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cost of pad use
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Reductions in the cost of pad use per day at 3-months post intervention compared to baseline.
|
3 months
|
Self-efficacy for managing incontinence
Time Frame: 3-months
|
An increase of 5 points or more on the Geriatric Self-Efficacy index for urinary incontinence at 3-months post-intervention compared to baseline.
|
3-months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Eleanor van den Heuvel, PhD, Brunel University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Tannenbaum C, Drali R, Holroyd-Leduc J, Richard L. Lessons learned: impact of a continence promotion activity for older community-dwelling women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Apr;29(4):540-4. doi: 10.1002/nau.20800.
- Tannenbaum C, Agnew R, Benedetti A, Thomas D, van den Heuvel E. Effectiveness of continence promotion for older women via community organisations: a cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 10;3(12):e004135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004135.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2013
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 10, 2010
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
November 11, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
May 15, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 14, 2013
Last Verified
May 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CIHR-200909-CUK-202417
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence
-
University of New MexicoRecruitingUrinary Incontinence | Urge Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, FemaleUnited States
-
Juna d.o.o.CompletedFemale Stress Urinary Incontinence | Mixed Incontinence, Urge and Stress
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); Stanford...CompletedUrinary Incontinence, Stress | Urge Incontinence | Urinary Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Urinary | Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Female | Urgency UrinaryUnited States
-
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of MunichUnknownIncontinence, Overactive Bladder, Stress Urinary IncontinenceGermany
-
San Diego Sexual MedicineRecruitingStress Urinary Incontinence | Urge IncontinenceUnited States
-
Copenhagen University Hospital at HerlevZealand University HospitalTerminatedStress Urinary Incontinence | Urge Urinary IncontinenceDenmark
-
ScitonCompletedUrinary Incontinence | Stress Urinary Incontinence | Urge IncontinenceUnited States
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalRecruitingWomen With Stress Urinary IncontinenceTaiwan
-
Université de SherbrookeRecruitingUrinary Incontinence | Urinary Stress Incontinence | Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, MaleCanada
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompletedUrinary Stress Incontinence (SI)Israel
Clinical Trials on Evidence-based self-management tool
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiCompletedMigraine DisordersUnited States
-
Judge Baker Children's CenterUniversity of Illinois at Chicago; University of Hawaii; MacArthur FoundationCompleted
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Type 2 DiabetesNetherlands
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y SaludCompleted
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedHypertension | Type 2 Diabetes MellitusChina
-
Leiden UniversityFibrocentrumCompleted
-
Robert Wood Johnson FoundationCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseUnited States
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenSidekick HealthRecruiting
-
Leiden University Medical CenterThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityNot yet recruitingChronic Kidney Diseases