Trial of Mentalization-Based Therapy for Substance Using Mothers of Infants and Toddlers

March 31, 2020 updated by: Yale University

Fostering Mothers' Emotionally-Responsive Parenting

A formal randomized efficacy trial testing the Mothers and Toddlers' program, an attachment-based parenting intervention for mothers enrolled in addiction treatment and caring for young children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Five years ago the investigators were funded to develop the Mothers and Toddlers Program (MTP; R01 DA17294 / Project Period: 8/20/04 - 12/31/09). MTP is the first parenting intervention developed for substance abusing mothers based on the attachment theory. It is also the only parenting intervention for substance abusing mothers that has led to improvement in maternal caregiving sensitivity and responsiveness to infant and toddler distress in observed lab-based interactions. The investigators now have all the research materials to conduct a Stage II randomized clinical trial including a treatment manual, treatment fidelity scales therapist training program and outcome measures. In this Stage II formal efficacy trial, the investigators (1) Introduce new measures of dyadic adjustment and child attachment, (2) Add an 18 week follow up period to test for sustained treatment effects, (3) Measure major constructs (reflective functioning, representations, dyadic adjustment, and child attachment) when they are expected to change, (4) Examine temporal mechanisms of change proposed in the MTP treatment model (5) Determine whether improvements in dyadic adjustment reduces incidence of relapse, (6) Broaden the MTP therapist pool by training four new therapists and (7) Broaden the coding pool by training 3 additional coders per measure. One hundred and fifty mothers caring for children ages 12 to 60 months of age will be recruited from outpatient substance abuse treatment services at the APT Foundation into the intention-to-treat sample and will be randomized to 12 weeks of MTP vs. PEP and followed for 33 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
        • The Moms 'n' Kids Program at the APT Foundation
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • Yale Psychosocial Substance Abuse Research Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All mothers ages 21 to 45 years, who are enrolled in treatment at one of the five APT Foundation clinics and caring for a biological child between 12 and 60 months of age will be eligible to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe mental health problems (e.g., suicidal, homicidal, psychosis, thought disorder)
  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Inability to speak English
  • Target child with serious illness or significant developmental delay (e.g., cognitive, language, or motor).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Parent Education
PE was developed to represent parent education and support that is typically available to mothers with substance use problems who are at high risk for neglecting their young children. Mothers enrolled in PEP will meet weekly for one hour with a PE counselor who will provide assistance in solving problems related to family basic needs (e.g., health care, child care, housing and education). The PE counselor will also provide a choice of pamphlets on age-related parenting topics each week from a series of pamphlets designed specifically for this study.
PE was developed to represent parent education and support that is typically available to mothers with substance use problems who are at high risk for neglecting their young children. Mothers enrolled in PEP will meet weekly for one hour with a PE counselor who will provide assistance in solving problems related to family basic needs and a choice of pamphlets on age-related parenting topics.
Experimental: Mothers and Toddlers Program
This intervention is an introductory, short-term, supportive, psychodynamic therapy for substance using mothers of young children that emphasizes the development of the capacity for mentalizing. Mothers meet with an individual, MBT-trained psychodynamically-oriented therapist for 12 sessions. The intervention is conducted a clinic where mothers are enrolled in treatment for their substance abuse.
This intervention is a short-term attachment-based parenting therapy for substance using mothers of young children that emphasizes the development of the capacity for mentalizing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parent Development Interview coded for maternal reflective functioning
Time Frame: Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
The Parent Development Interview (PDI; Slade, Aber, Berger, Bresgi, & Kaplan, 2002) was used to measure maternal capacity to mentalize about her own and her child's behavior. The PDI is a 1 hour semi-structured interview designed to elicit the mother's narrative about commonly occurring, emotionally-challenging aspects of parenting. A rating of 1 indicates a absence of recognition of mental states. A rating of 3 indicates a limited capacity to acknowledge mental states. A rating of 5 indicates the presence of a rudimentary capacity for reflective functioning.
Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
Parent Development Interview coded for maternal reflective functioning
Time Frame: Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
The Parent Development Interview (PDI; Slade, Aber, Berger, Bresgi, & Kaplan, 2002) was used to measure maternal capacity to mentalize about her own and her child's behavior. The PDI is a 1 hour semi-structured interview designed to elicit the mother's narrative about commonly occurring, emotionally-challenging aspects of parenting. A rating of 1 indicates a absence of recognition of mental states. A rating of 3 indicates a limited capacity to acknowledge mental states. A rating of 5 indicates the presence of a rudimentary capacity for reflective functioning.
Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working Model of the Child Interview (coded for representation quality)
Time Frame: Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
The Working Model of the Child Interview (WMCI; Zeanah & Benoit, 1993) is a 1.5 hour interview used to elicit a narrative description of the mother's perceptions of her child and their relationship. The rater was trained by the to reliably code 6e qualitative subscales Openness, Richness, Coherence, Caregiving Sensitivity and Acceptance and Involvement. On the mean of six subscales, a score of three is considered to represent average representational quality, scores of 1 and 2 are considered to represent clinical risk and scores of 4 and 5 are considered to represent optimal quality.
Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
Working Model of the Child Interview (coded for representation quality)
Time Frame: Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
The Working Model of the Child Interview (WMCI; Zeanah & Benoit, 1993) is a 1.5 hour interview used to elicit a narrative description of the mother's perceptions of her child and their relationship. The rater was trained by the to reliably code 6e qualitative subscales Openness, Richness, Coherence, Caregiving Sensitivity and Acceptance and Involvement. On the mean of six subscales, a score of three is considered to represent average representational quality, scores of 1 and 2 are considered to represent clinical risk and scores of 4 and 5 are considered to represent optimal quality.
Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
NCAST Teaching Scales (Maternal Behavior)
Time Frame: Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
The NCAST Teaching Scale (Barnard & Eyres, 1979) is a standardized, 73 item tool used to observe and rate quality of interactions with children birth to 36 months. Mothers choose a task to teach the child in a 5 minute teaching session. Maternal behavior is coded on 4 dimensions: Sensitivity to Cues, Response to Distress, Social-Emotional Growth Fostering, & Cognitive Growth Fostering. The Total Caregiver Score is the sum of the 4 subscale scores. The Total Caregiver Contingency Score is the sum of 20 items from the 4 subscales that involve the caregiver's contingent response to child cues.
Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
NCAST Teaching Scales (Maternal Behavior)
Time Frame: Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
The NCAST Teaching Scale (Barnard & Eyres, 1979) is a standardized, 73 item tool used to observe and rate quality of interactions with children birth to 36 months. Mothers choose a task to teach the child in a 5 minute teaching session. Maternal behavior is coded on 4 dimensions: Sensitivity to Cues, Response to Distress, Social-Emotional Growth Fostering, & Cognitive Growth Fostering. The Total Caregiver Score is the sum of the 4 subscale scores. The Total Caregiver Contingency Score is the sum of 20 items from the 4 subscales that involve the caregiver's contingent response to child cues.
Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
NCAST Teaching Scales (Child Behavior)
Time Frame: Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
Child behavior with the mother was assessed using the Clarity of Cues and the Responsiveness to Caregiver Subscales from the NCAST Teaching Scales. The Child Total Score is the sum of the 2 scales. The Child Contingency Score is the sum of 12 contingent items from the 2 scales.
Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
NCAST Teaching Scales (Child Behavior)
Time Frame: Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
Child behavior with the mother was assessed using the Clarity of Cues and the Responsiveness to Caregiver Subscales from the NCAST Teaching Scales. The Child Total Score is the sum of the 2 scales. The Child Contingency Score is the sum of 12 contingent items from the 2 scales.
Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
Child Attachment Status
Time Frame: Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
We will use the standard 8-episode protocol Strange Situation protocol. Each child will receive a classification of secure, insecure or disorganized for each time point.
Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996) was used to assess maternal symptoms of depression. The BDI is a widely used 21-item questionnaire rated on a 4-point scale and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 63: scores between 13 and 19 indicate mild depression; scores between 20 and 28 indicate moderate levels of depression, and scores between 29 and 63 indicate severe levels of depression (Beck et al., 1996).
Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996) was used to assess maternal symptoms of depression. The BDI is a widely used 21-item questionnaire rated on a 4-point scale and yields a total score ranging from 0 to 63: scores between 13 and 19 indicate mild depression; scores between 20 and 28 indicate moderate levels of depression, and scores between 29 and 63 indicate severe levels of depression (Beck et al., 1996).
Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
Brief Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI; Derogatis, 1993) was used to assess maternal global psychiatric distress. The BSI is a standardized, widely used, 53-item, 5-point, self-report measure of psychopathology. The composite Global Severity Index (GSI) measures current overall symptomatology across multiple domains and has demonstrated good reliability and validity (Derogatis, 1993). T scores above 60 on the GSI indicate risk for a clinical disorder.
Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
Curiosity Box Paradigm
Time Frame: Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
. We will use the Curiosity Box Paradigm (Mayes et al., 1993) to assess dyadic adjustment under circumstances of mild uncertainty (i.e., during the child's exploration of unfamiliar toys/objects). Children will explore a box of 9 novel toys or objects (that they are unlikely to have seen before) after an initial 5 minute warm up period with one box of 9 familiar toys. Maternal, child and dyadic behavior will be assessed with the Coding Interaction Behavior Scales (Feldman, 1998).
Change at week 12 (post-treatment) from baseline
Curiosity Box Paradigm
Time Frame: Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline
. We will use the Curiosity Box Paradigm (Mayes et al., 1993) to assess dyadic adjustment under circumstances of mild uncertainty (i.e., during the child's exploration of unfamiliar toys/objects). Children will explore a box of 9 novel toys or objects (that they are unlikely to have seen before) after an initial 5 minute warm up period with one box of 9 familiar toys. Maternal, child and dyadic behavior will be assessed with the Coding Interaction Behavior Scales (Feldman, 1998).
Change at week 33 (follow up) from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nancy E. Suchman, Ph.D., Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parent Education

3
Subscribe