GP2013 in the Treatment of RA Patients Refractory to or Intolerant of Standard Therapy

January 23, 2018 updated by: Sandoz

A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study to Evaluate PK, PD, Safety and Efficacy of GP2013 and Rituximab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory or Intolerant to Standard DMARDs and up to Three Anti-TNF Therapies.

The purpose of this study is to determine the PK/PD, efficacy and safety of GP2013 in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

312

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires#1, Argentina
        • Investigative Site
      • Buenos Aires#2, Argentina
        • Investigative Site
      • Innsbruck, Austria
        • Investigative Site
      • Vienna#1, Austria
        • Investigative Site
      • Kortrijk, Belgium
        • Investigative Site
      • Merksem, Belgium
        • Investigative Site
      • Curitiba, Brazil
        • Investigative Site
      • Goiânia, Brazil
        • Investigative Site
      • Sao Paulo#1, Brazil
        • Investigative Site
      • Sao Paulo#2, Brazil
        • Investigative Site
      • Tallinn, Estonia
        • North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation
      • Amiens Cedex, France
        • Investigative Site
      • Cahors, France
        • Investigative Site
      • Corbeil Essonnes, France
        • Investigative Site
      • La Gaillarde, France
        • Investigative Site
      • Orleans, France
        • Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • Freiburg, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • Göttingen, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • Hildesheim, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • Jena, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • München, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • Nürnberg, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • Ratingen, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • Regensburg, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • Würzburg, Germany
        • Investigative Site
      • Kistarcsa, Hungary, 2143
        • Pest Megyei Flór Ferenc
      • Veszprem, Hungary, H-2800
        • Megyei Csolnoky Ferenc Kórház Nonprofit Zrt.
      • Ajmer, India
        • Investigative Site
      • Bangalore, India
        • Investigative Site
      • Hyderabad, India
        • Investigative Site
      • Jaipur, India
        • Investigative Site
      • New Delhi, India
        • Investigative Site
      • Secunderabad, India
        • Investigative Site
      • Milano, Italy
        • Investigative Site
      • Bucharest#1, Romania
        • Investigative Site
      • Bucharest#2, Romania
        • Investigative Site
      • Cluj, Romania
        • Investigative Site
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Investigative Site
      • Mérida, Spain
        • Investigative Site
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain
        • Investigative Site
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Investigative Site
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Investigative Site
      • Izmir, Turkey
        • Investigative Site
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90057
        • Miller Clinical Research
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40504
        • Bluegrass Community Research, Inc.
    • Maryland
      • Cumberland, Maryland, United States, 21502
        • Klein & Associates
      • Hagerstown, Maryland, United States, 21740
        • Klein & Associates
    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01605
        • Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68516
        • Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89128
        • Innovative Health Research
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28210
        • DJL Clinical Research PLLC
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73103
        • Health Research of Oklahoma
    • Pennsylvania
      • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
        • Altoona Center For Clinical Research
      • Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States, 19610
        • Clinical Research Center of Reading LLC
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29406
        • Low Country Rheumatology, PA
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
        • Regional Health Clinical Research
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
        • West Tennessee Research Institute
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78232
        • Arthritis & Osteoporosis Center of South Texas
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98133
        • The Seattle Arthritis Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatoid arthritis as defined by the 1987 ACR classification
  • Severe active seropositive disease
  • Inadequate response or intolerance to other DMARDs and anti-TNFs
  • Treatment with Methotrexate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Female patients nursing
  • Women of childbearing potential unless using birth control
  • Active infection
  • Known immunodeficiency syndrome
  • Positive Hepatitis B surface antigen or antibodies to Hepatitis C
  • History of cancer

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GP2013
1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)
Active Comparator: MabThera
1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)
Other Names:
  • EU-Rituximab
Active Comparator: Rituxan
1000 mg iv infusion on two separate occasions, two weeks apart (i.e. on Day 1 and on Day 15)
Other Names:
  • US-Rituximab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AUC(0-inf) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 weeks
Area under the curve AUC(0-inf) calculated based on serum samples, collected from baseline up to 24 weeks: Day 1, 4, 8, 15, 18, 29, 57, 85,113 and 169
From baseline to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan Following IV Infusion in Patients With RA
Time Frame: From baseline to week 24
Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) after the first infusion of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in patients with RA. Samples collected from baseline up to 24 weeks: Day 1, 4, 8, 15, 18, 29, 57, 85,113 and 169.
From baseline to week 24
Area Under the Effect Curve From Baseline to Day 14 (AUEC(0-14d)) of Percent B-cells of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in Patients With RA
Time Frame: 14 days
Area under the effect curve of percent change of peripheral B-cell count from baseline to Day 14 (AUEC(0-14d)) of GP2013, MabThera and Rituxan in patients with RA
14 days
Change From Baseline in DAS28(CRP) at Week 24
Time Frame: 24 weeks

Change from baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 joint count - C-reactive proteine DAS28(CRP) at Week 24.

In order to calculate the DAS28(CRP) the number of tender joints and swollen joints were assessed using 28-joint count (tender28 and swollen28).The patient's global assessment of disease activity (GH) measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS from 0mm - best to 100mm - worst) was obtained.

DAS28(CRP) = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28* sqrt(swollen28) + 0.36 * ln(CRP+1) + 0.014 * GH + 0.96 The DAS28(CRP) provides a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the RA, while lower values correspond with less disease activity. A decrease in DAS28 signifies a clinical improvement.

24 weeks
Number of Patients With ACR20 (CRP) Response
Time Frame: 24 weeks

A patient will be considered as improved according the ACR20 criteria

  • at least 20 % improvement from baseline in tender joint count, using the 68-joint count
  • at least 20 % improvement from baseline in swollen joint count, using the 66-joint count
  • and at least 20% improvement from baseline in a least 3 of the following 5 measures:
  • Patient's assessment of RA pain (VAS 100 mm)
  • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm)
  • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 100 mm)
  • Patient self-assessed disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index)
  • Acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate)
24 weeks
Summary of Disease Activity According to CDAI
Time Frame: At week 24

In order to calculate the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) the number of tender and swollen joints were assessed using the 28 -joint count (tender28 and swollen28). The patient's global assessment of disease activity and the physician's global assessment of disease activity were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 10 cm (from 0=best to 10=worst).

CDAI = tender28 + swollen28 + patient's global assessment (in cm) + physician's global assessment (in cm)

At week 24
Summary of Disease Activity According to SDAI
Time Frame: At week 24

In order to calculate the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) the number of tender and swollen joints were assessed using the 28 -joint count (tender28 and swollen28). The patient's global assessment of disease activity and the physician's global assessment of disease activity were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 10 cm (from 0=best to 10=worst).

SDAI = CDAI + CRP (in mg/dL)

(CDAI = tender28 + swollen28 + patient's global assessment (in cm) + physician's global assessment (in cm))

At week 24
Participant Response as Assessed by EULAR Response Criteria
Time Frame: At week 24

Present DAS28 ≤ 3.2 (low): good response (if improvement > 1.2), moderate response (if improvement >0.6 and ≤ 1.2), no response (if improvement ≤ 0.6).

Present DAS28 > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1 (moderate): moderate response (if improvement > 1.2), moderate response (if improvement >0.6 and ≤ 1.2), no response (if improvement ≤ 0.6).

Present DAS28 > 5.1 (high): moderate response (if improvement > 1.2), no response (if improvement >0.6 and ≤ 1.2), no response (if improvement ≤ 0.6).

At week 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With at Least One Anti-Drug-Antibody (ADA) Positive Serum Sample
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of patients with at least one post-baseline Anti-Drug-Antibody (ADA) positive serum sample until the last study visit. Sampling was at Day 1, 29, 113, 169, 267, 365, optional visit 1 (could be at any time between day 169 - week 24 and day 365 - week 52 for patients, who received a 2nd treatment course) and optional visit 2 (only applicable for patients, who received a 2nd treatment course, 26 weeks thereafter, if this was after day 365 - week 52).
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Sandoz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on GP2013

Subscribe