- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03493659
The Effects of Standing Tutorials on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Among Undergraduate Students
Problem-based learning (PBL) is an education model utilized by Maastricht University and many other universities worldwide. PBL occurs in small, collaborative tutorials, under the facilitation of a tutor. This study explores the effects of standing tutorials, compared against sitting tutorials, on PBL among undergraduate students. A quantitative approach will be taken to objectively measure students' learning, and a qualitative approach will be taken to obtain a deeper understanding of the processes of learning.
It is hypothesized that students in the standing tutorials will be able to recall more academic concepts and link the concepts better than students in the sitting tutorials (H1). Audio-recording of the tutorials will be used to measure the discussions within the tutorials. The transcriptions obtained from the recording will be studied through text analysis. It is hypothesized that students in the standing tutorials will produce more discussions, and therefore a higher word count (H2). It is also hypothesized that the students in the standing tutorials will use more word categories that are conducive to the discussion and learning process (H3).
Through the qualitative approach, the content of the transcriptions will be analysed through a thematic analysis. It is hypothesized that the students in the standing tutorials will produce more learning-oriented interactions (H4).
Two additional factors that would be measured are subsequent physical activity and academic achievement. ActivPAL accelerometers will be used to measure the students' daily activity, to find out if the students' daily activities are affected by the standing tutorials, for example, students may sit more as a result of fatigue from the standing tutorials, or conversely transfer the active behaviour from the standing tutorials to other activities outside the tutorial group.It is hypothesized that standing tutorials do not affect the students' subsequent physical activity, and therefore there will be no significant differences of daily activity between students in the sitting and standing tutorials (H5). With regards to academic achievement, it is hypothesized that the students in the standing tutorials will have higher academic achievements after the course compared to the students in the sitting tutorials (H6).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Limburg
-
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6200MD
- Maastricht University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Matriculated undergraduate students of Maastricht University
- Students who have given their consent to participate in this study.
- The course subject is well-established and mandatory for all students within the specific bachelor's programme. A well-established course will be chosen so that clear scoring is possible on the concept tests (explained in the Materials and Analysis sections) that will be administered to the students. The course should be mandatory for all students within the bachelor's programme so as to reduce the selection bias that may otherwise occur if we decide to select tutorial groups that only specific groups of students signed up for. An example of a well-established and mandatory course for students in the Biomedical Sciences bachelor's programme at Maastricht University would include 'Brain, behaviour and movement, 'Human genetics, reproduction and prenatal development' and so on.
- The course coordinators and tutors who are the gatekeepers of the students would have given their permission and cooperation in planning the study into the tutorials.
- The duration of the course would last at least 10 tutorial classes.
- The duration of each tutorial is 2 hours.
- The timing of the tutorial groups will have to be similar to minimize any effects arising due to tests being carried out at different times of the day.
- The course is taught in English.
Exclusion Criteria:
- For the standing tutorials, those who are suffering from musculoskeletal discomfort or pathologies that may prevent or influence movement
- Non-matriculated student of Maastricht University
- Non-matriculated student of the chosen course for the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
NO_INTERVENTION: Sit-Sit
The participants will sit during the tutorials, and sit during the concept tests given to measure their learning.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Sit-Stand
The participants will sit during the tutorials.
Intervention: Behavioral: Standing during Concept Test will be administered
|
The participants will stand with a standing desk at an ergonomically correct height during the administration of the Concept Test.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Stand-Stand
The participants will stand during the tutorials, and stand during the concept tests given to measure their learning.
Intervention: Behavioral: Standing during Concept Test and regular tutorial session will be administered.
|
The participants will stand with a standing desk at an ergonomically correct height during the administration of the Concept Test and during their regular tutorial sessions.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Stand-Sit
The participants will stand during the tutorials. Intervention: Behavioral: Standing during regular tutorial session will be administered. However, participants will sit during the concept tests given to measure their learning. |
The participants will stand with a standing desk at an ergonomically correct height during their regular tutorial sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Process of Learning
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The discussions that are carried out during PBL will be audio-recorded and undergo text and thematic analysis
|
1 hour
|
Outcome of Learning
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Concept Tests will be administered where students list the number of concepts they can recall, and draw a concept map.
Both the recalled concepts and the map will be scored independently and combined for a final score.
|
10 minutes
|
Academic Achievement
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Grades of Final Exam
|
2 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change of Subsequent Physical Activity
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Participants' subsequent physical activity will be measured for 10 days, using the ActivPAL accelerometer, to measure whether standing tutorials (compared against sitting tutorials) have an affect on the participants' daily life's physical activity.
|
7 days
|
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
Participants' overall feelings and emotions are compared between groups in the standing tutorials and sitting tutorials.
|
5 minutes
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Attendance
Time Frame: Less than 5 minutes (recorded by tutor, as required by the course, even without this intervention study)
|
Student attendance across the course are compared to see if attendance is affected by the intervention
|
Less than 5 minutes (recorded by tutor, as required by the course, even without this intervention study)
|
Tutor Rating
Time Frame: Less than 5 minutes
|
Tutor rating by the students, that the students will give at the end of the course (even without this intervention study)
|
Less than 5 minutes
|
Search, Preparing and Reporting Phase Questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
The questionnaire contains 23 statements, each with a five-point Likert scale describing to what extent the students agreed or disagreed with each statement (1 = 'completely disagree' to 5 = 'completely agree').
Nine statements refer to the theme of "search phase", six statements refer to the theme of "preparing phase", and eight statements refer to the theme of "reporting phase".
The aggregate score for each theme will be summed up from the scores on the Likert scale for each statement.
Higher scores indicate more effort/preparation for each theme.
|
5 minutes
|
Group Interaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
This questionnaire is given to tutors to assess the quality of learning-oriented group interactions in PBL.
The questionnaire contains 11 statements, each with a five-point Likert scale describing to what extent the tutors agreed or disagreed with each statement (1 = 'completely disagree' to 5 = 'completely agree').
Four statements refer to the theme of "exploratory questions", four statements refer to the theme of "cumulative reasoning", and three statements refer to the theme of "handling conflicts".
The aggregate score for each theme will be summed up from the scores on the Likert scale for each statement.
Higher scores indicate better discussion quality for each theme.
|
5 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 00909
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Problem-Based Learning
-
Sulaiman AlRajhi CollegesCompletedCost | Problem-based Learning | Peer GroupSaudi Arabia
-
Harvard University Faculty of MedicineCompletedProblem-based Learning | Education, Medical | Problem Solving | Education, Medical, Undergraduate | Interactive TutorialUnited States
-
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and SimulationUnknownSurgical Procedure, Unspecified | Simulation Training | Education, Medical | Learning | Humans | Problem-Based Learning | Clinical CompetenceDenmark
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruiting
-
Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be...Completed
-
Mbarara University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Calgary; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute; The ELMA... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSimulation-based LearningUganda
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Dar Al Uloom UniversityCompletedMedical Education | Simulation Based LearningSaudi Arabia
-
Pei-Hung LiaoActive, not recruitingLearning ProblemTaiwan
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedLearning ProblemTurkey
Clinical Trials on Standing during Concept Test
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephCompletedEmergencies | Acute Vestibular SyndromeFrance
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsWithdrawn
-
Northwell HealthEnrolling by invitationAutonomic Nervous System Diseases | Autonomic Dysfunction | Autonomic Imbalance | Vagus Nerve Autonomic DisorderUnited States
-
Istanbul Kültür UniversityIstanbul UniversityCompleted
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalWithdrawnLarynx | Obstruction | Vocal Cord DysfunctionFinland
-
Biruni UniversityCompletedBalance Problems | Geriatric PopulationTurkey
-
Istituto Auxologico ItalianoASST Gaetano Pini-CTORecruiting
-
University Hospital, AngersCompleted
-
Aleva Neurotherapeutics SATerminatedParkinson's Disease | Essential TremorSwitzerland
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingFamilial Mediterranean Fever | MEFV Gene MutationFrance