Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure

March 23, 2024 updated by: Mehmet Cem Turan, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

Long Term Comparison of Double Layer Continuously Locked Closure of Uterine Incision in Cesarean Section Versus Double Layer Purse String Closure (Turan Technique): A Prospective Randomized Study

Cesarean section (C/S) is an operation most commonly performed in Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics. Complications related with incomplete healing of Kerr uterine incision after C/S (adhesions, separation (dehiscence), endometritis, endometriosis, anomalous placentation in subsequent pregnancies, incomplete or complete uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies, ...) are very important issues. Classically Kerr incision is repaired with continuous locked suturing. Purse string suturing of Kerr incision may reduce the size of the incision and in turn may reduce short and long term complications. For this reason, the investigators aimed to compare two closure techniques.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the clinic, patients undergoing cesarean section that meet the criteria for inclusion into the study and agreed to participate in the study will be randomized into two groups (computer-assisted randomization method will be used.) In the first group of patients classical closure method of Kerr incision(double layered continuously locked suturing) will be used. In the second group of patients double layered purse string closure technique will be used.

Women will be followed for a subsequent pregnancy in the next average 6 years. If they become pregnant again they will be followed up during pregnancy for comparison of long-term effects of the two suture techniques. Patients will be followed especially from the aspects of placental anomalies. Presence of intra-abdominal adhesions, uterine dehiscence, placenta previa, placental invasion anomalies (eg, placenta accreta and others)and incomplete or complete rupture will be compared between two groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

168

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Health Institutes of Turkey ISTANBUL, TURKEY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Term (> 37 weeks) pregnancy
  • Cervical dilatation < 4 cm
  • Kerr incision
  • Age > 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being in active phase of labor
  • Emergency situations (fetal distress, cord prolapse, placental abruption,severe pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, placenta previa, vasa previa )
  • Having a history of uterine surgery (myomectomy, hysterotomy) other than CS
  • Extension of Kerr incision
  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Maternal diabetes mellitus
  • Maternal connective tissue disease
  • Uterine malformation
  • Uterine fibroids on Kerr incision line
  • Chorioamnionitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Purse string closure technique
Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with purse string suture.
Uterine incision will be closed with purse string closure technique.
Other Names:
  • Uterine incision in C/S
Active Comparator: Continuously locked closure technique
Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with continuously locked closure technique.
Uterine incision will be closed with continuously locked closure technique
Other Names:
  • Uterine incision in C/S

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Placenta Previa
Time Frame: Subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years
It will be noted whether placenta previa in cesarean operation of the subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years, and two groups will be compared.
Subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Placenta Insertion Anomalies
Time Frame: Subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years
It will be noted whether placenta insertion anomalies (placenta accreta and others) in cesarean operation of the subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years, and two groups will be compared.
Subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years
Uterine Rupture
Time Frame: Subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years
It will be noted whether uterine rupture (incomplete or complete, dehiscence of uterine incision) in cesarean operation of the subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years, and two groups will be compared.
Subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years
Intra-abdominal Adhesions
Time Frame: Up to average 6 years
It will be noted whether intra-abdominal adhesion in cesarean operation of the subsequent pregnancy within next average 6 years, and two groups will be compared.
Up to average 6 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Cem Turan, Health Institutes of Turkey ISTANBUL, TURKEY

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

February 3, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Placenta Accreta

Clinical Trials on Purse string closure technique

Subscribe