Endoscopic Assessment of Polyp Histology

June 5, 2019 updated by: Prof. Dr. Thomas Rösch, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

On-Site Endoscopic Prediction of Polyp Histology During Screening Colonoscopy

Polyps found during screening colonoscopy have to be removed or at least biopsied. Attempts to save costs include endoscopic assessment of polyps with regards to differential diagnoses between adenomas (which have to be removed) and hyperplastic polyps (could be left in place or removed and not examined histologically). Such a concept would only be feasible if endoscopy can make the differential diagnosis with high accuracy. Such high accuracy rates - between 80% and 95% - have been reported from reference centers with specific scientific interest. The investigators want to test whether these results a) can be reproduced in the private practice setting performing large-volume screening colonoscopies and b) whether latest generation endoscopes provide benefit in terms of better accuracy.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing screening colonoscopy will be randomized to the use of two different colonoscopes, namely the latest generation (Pentax iScan, Hi Line) versus the previous generation (Classic Line). On withdrawal, all polyps found will be diagnosed according to their pit pattern (classification scheme mit example images provided) and a differential diagnosis made during the live examination. Pit patterns I/II will be classified as hyperplastic polyps, patterns III-V as adenomas (in a subgroup IV and V will be classified as pre-/malignant). All polyps will be photographed from near distance to allow for later blinded review which will be done on patients with only one polyp (to avoid mix-up of polyps) by 3 examiners and 2 independent hospital experts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1069

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany, 22453
        • University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients undergoing screening colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Missing consent
  • No screening colonoscopy (diagnostic colonoscopy because of symptoms)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hi Line
This arm is examined with latest generation HDTV colonoscopes
this endoscope is used as compared to an older generations cope (classic line) currently in use
Other Names:
  • Hi Line colonoscopy
  • IScan Colonoscope
No Intervention: Classic Line
control group undergoing colonoscopy with older generation scope currently in use in most centers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of HDTV/iScan image technology (Hi Line) versus conventional colonoscopy (classic Line) in the diagnosis of adenomas versus hyperplastic polyps
Time Frame: 14 months
14 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comparison of online accuracy during colonoscopy with later blinded image assessment in the differential diagnosis of adenomas versus hyperplastic polyps
Time Frame: 14 months
14 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Rösch, MD, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colonic Polyps

Clinical Trials on Latest generation colonoscopy as diagnostic instrument

3
Subscribe