Web-based Methodology Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tolterodine ER in Subjects With Overactive Bladder (REMOTE)

Exploratory, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Single Center, Web-Based Phase IV Pilot Methodology Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Tolterodine ER In Subjects With Overactive Bladder

To compare the effect of tolterodine ER 4 mg to placebo on patient reported outcomes in subjects with overactive bladder after 1, 4, and 12 weeks of treatment using an innovative web-based trial design

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • University of California San Francisco
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94104
        • Mytrus, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female and 21 years or older
  • Overactive bladder symptoms (subject-reported) for at least 3 months
  • Be resident in the United States of America and have access and be able to use a computer with internet access throughout the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant hepatic, renal or neurological condition such as stroke (with residual deficit), multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, or Parkinson's disease.
  • History of cystitis, continence, urogenitalcancer or radiation
  • Subjects who are pregnant, nursing, or with a positive urine pregnancy test or who are intending to become pregnant within 28 days after the completion of the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
A placebo of Tolterodine ER 4 mg will be taken with water every day with or without food. It should be swallowed whole without chewing.
Experimental: Tolterodine ER
One 4 mg capsule will be taken with water every day with or without food. It should be swallowed whole without chewing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI). UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit.
Baseline, Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 1, 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
Mean voided volume per micturition was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0 at that visit. Baseline values for each time point were calculated separately considering only those participants who were evaluable at the given time point.
Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
UUI episodes were defined as those with the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. Baseline values for each time point were calculated separately considering only those participants who were evaluable at the given time point.
Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 1 and 4
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4
Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Baseline values for each time point were calculated separately considering only those participants who were evaluable at the given time point.
Baseline, Week 1, 4
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
Nocturnal micturitions were defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between the time the participant went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of nocturnal micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit.
Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
The mean number of micturition-related nocturnal urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to (>=) 3 that occurred between time participant went to bed and time participant arose to start next day divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.
Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of >= 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. Baseline values for each time point were calculated separately considering only those participants who were evaluable at the given time point.
Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
PPBC: self-administered,single-item questionnaire to describe participant's perception of bladder-related problems. PPBC assessed on 6-point scale:1=no problems at all,2=some very minor problems,3=some minor problems,4=some moderate problems,5=severe problems,6=many severe problems. Results categorized as score change (SC) from baseline on 2-point scale:improvement (negative SC),no improvement (SC 0 or more) and on 4-point scale:major improvement (SC is negative in magnitude of 2 or more), minor improvement (SC is negative in magnitude of 1), no change (SC= 0),deterioration (positive SC).
Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Bl), Week 1, 4, 12
PPUS: a self-administered, single-item, validated questionnaire that measures the participant's perception of urinary urgency. It is sensitive to changes in perceptions of urinary urgency over time. Scale of 0 (usually not able to hold urine), 1 (usually able to hold urine [without leaking] until reaching toilet if go to toilet immediately), or 2 (usually able to finish what he/she is doing before going to toilet [without leaking]). Results categorized as SC from baseline on 3-point scale: improvement (positive SC), no change (SC 0), deterioration (negative SC).
Baseline (Bl), Week 1, 4, 12
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for items 1 to 8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains (range): concern(7-42), coping(8-48), sleep(5-30), and social function(5-30). Total HRQL score (25-125) derived as sum of HRQL domains. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (HRQL domain or total) = [(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range]*100. Higher transformed scores indicate better HRQL.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Social Domain Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains (range): concern(7-42), coping(8-48), sleep(5-30), and social function(5-30). Total HRQL score (25-125) derived as sum of HRQL domains. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (HRQL domain or total) = [(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range]*100. Higher transformed scores indicate better HRQL.
Baseline, Week 12
Number of Participants With Response Regarding Source of First Information About Study
Time Frame: Week 12
Participant experience questionnaire (PEQ) is a web-based self-administered, exploratory questionnaire that assesses the participant's perception of trial method. Number of participants who responded to question 1, "Where did you hear first about the study?" are reported.
Week 12
Number of Participants With Reason for Participation in the Study
Time Frame: Week 12
PEQ is a web-based self-administered, exploratory questionnaire that assesses the participant's perception of trial method. Number of participants who responded to question 2, "What led you to participate given the study drug is already available?" are reported.
Week 12
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Time Frame: Week 12
PEQ:self-administered, to assess perception of trial method. Question3, "How satisfied were you with items?" on scale 1(very satisfied) to 5(very dissatisfied)- recruitment; questionnaires,surveys(Ques,Sur); identification verification(IV); informed consent(IC) process; website experience; phone call; laboratory(lab) kit delivery; lab location; lab staff service(Ser); physical exam(PE) scheduling,location (sch,loc); PE visit; medication(med) first batch delivery; med second batch delivery; cell phone(CP) received; CP use; call center(CC) ser; medical support(supp); technical supp; overall.
Week 12
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
Time Frame: Week 12
PEQ:self-administered, assesses participants perception of trial method. Question4, "How satisfied were you with items?" on scale 1(very easy) to 5(very difficult)- a: teaching video explaining CP use; recording urinations using CP; size of text on CP; sending your urinary information(inf) using your CP, e: overall, suitability for capturing urinations as they happened.
Week 12
Participant Perception Regarding Received Treatment in the Study
Time Frame: Week 12
PEQ is a web-based self-administered, exploratory questionnaire that assesses the participant's perception of trial method. Number of participants who responded to question 5, "What treatment did you think you were on?" are reported.
Week 12
Participant Perception Regarding Recommending a Friend to Enter Similar Study
Time Frame: Week 12
PEQ is a web-based self-administered, exploratory questionnaire that assesses the participant's perception of trial method. Number of participants who responded to question 6, "How likely would you be to recommend a friend to enter a similar study?" are reported.
Week 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Baseline up to 28 days after last dose
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Relatedness and Severity
Time Frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose
AE:any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study medication in participant who received study drug. Relatedness to study medication was assessed by the investigator. Severity of AEs assessed as: mild (does not interfere with participant's usual function), moderate (interferes to some extent with participant's usual function) and severe (interferes significantly with participant's usual function). Mild, moderate and severe are not mutually exclusive; hence same participant may be included in more than 1 type of severity of AEs.
Baseline up to 28 days after last dose
Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Study Due to Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Baseline up to 28 days after last dose
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Time Frame: Week 12
Criteria for potentially clinically significant (PCS) laboratory values: Hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell less than (<) 0.8 lower limit of normal(LLN); platelet <0.5 LLN, >1.75 upper LN (ULN);white blood cell <0.6 LLN, >1.5 ULN; lymphocyte, total neutrophil(absolute[AL]),Total protein, albumin, phosphate <0.8 LLN, >1.2 ULN; basophil, eosinophil, monocyte >1.2ULN; Total bilirubin >1.5ULN; aspartate, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase >3ULN; Blood urea nitrogen, creatinine >1.3ULN; sodium <0.95LLN, >1.05ULN; potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, calcium <0.9LLN, >1.1ULN.
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on Tolterodine ER

3
Subscribe