Comparison of Tianeptine Versus Escitalopram Patients Major Depressive Disorder (CAMPION)

January 24, 2013 updated by: Bum-Hee Yu, Samsung Medical Center

Comparison of Tianeptine Versus Escitalopram for the Treatment of Depression and Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Study

The primary object of this study is to confirm the superiority of tianeptine compared to escitalopram on effects that improves subjective and objective cognitive impairments in patients suffering from major depressive disorder.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Along with depressive symptoms, subjective and objective cognitive impairments are frequently complained by the patients with major depressive disorder. Tianeptine acts on glutamate system and is known as a promising drug for improving cognitive impairment.

The present study aims to confirm the superiority of tianeptine compared to escitalopram on effects that improves subjective and objective cognitive impairments after a 12-week treatment in patients suffering from major depressive disorder.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

164

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Goyang, Korea, Republic of, 411-706
        • Inje University Paik Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Konkuk University Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 100-032
        • Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Eulji Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients fulfilling DSM-IV-TR(American Psychiatric Association, 4thedition, 2000) criteria for Major Depressive Disorder diagnosis
  2. The male or female patients aged more than 40 years
  3. Patients able to hand in written informed consent before his/her participation in this clinical study
  4. Women of childbearing potential with negative pregnancy test during screening phase and entire study period (during entire study period, able to clearly agree with effective contraception such as contraceptive pill, progesterone injection, levonorgestrel implant, estrogen ring, transdermal contraceptive agent, intra-uterine contraceptive device, sterilization operation of husband, and double contraceptive method (e.g. combination of condom, pessary, spermicide, etc. ))
  5. Patients who have subjective cognitive impairment, or who have objective cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤26) without subjective cognitive impairment
  6. HAM-D(17-items) total score ≥ 16

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients meeting more than one following patient characteristics

    1. Patients fulfilling DSM-IV-TR current or past diagnosis of any psychiatric disorders other than major depressive disorder (i.e. manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia, delirium, dementia, eating disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder with psychotic features, mental retardation, organic brain disorder, or psychiatric disorders due to general medical condition, according to DSM-IV-TR)
    2. Patients with any substance-related disorder (excluding nicotine) within the past 12 months, as defined in DSM-IV-TR
    3. Patients with a history or presence of any neurological disorders (e.g. multiple sclerosis, seizure, etc.)
    4. Patients with any axis II disorder that prone to interfere with the evaluation of the study
  2. Patients with a history or presence of any hypersensitivity to tianeptine, escitalopram or other drugs
  3. Patients who receive formal psychotherapy (e.g. cognitive behavioral therapy, insight-oriented psychoanalysis, interpersonal therapy, etc.) and who have a plan for getting psychotherapy
  4. Patients with any clinically significant abnormality (e.g. hepatic failure, renal failure, cardiovascular disorder, respiratory disorder, gastrointestinal disorder, endocrine disorder, neurological disorder, inflammatory disorder, neoplasm, metabolic disorder, etc.)
  5. Patients who have abnormal ECG and a significant disease according to the investigator's judgment
  6. Patients with any chronic liver or kidney disease
  7. Patients with a family history of long QT syndrome
  8. Patients previously not responders to tianeptine or escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder
  9. Patients who have a suicide risk according to the investigator's judgment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Escitalopram
week1 : 5mg/day q.d., week2: 10mg/day q.d.
Experimental: Tianeptine
week1 : 25mg/day q.d., week2: 37.5mg/day b.i.d. (12.5mg 1T, 12.5mg 2T
Other Names:
  • Stablon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression(HAM-D)score from baseline
Time Frame: followed up to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
followed up to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
Changes in Korean version-California Verbal Learnign Test(K-CVLT) total score from baseline
Time Frame: followed up to 4,8,12 weeks from baseline
followed up to 4,8,12 weeks from baseline
Changes in Visual Continuous Performance Test(CPT) total score from baseline
Time Frame: followed up to 4,8,12 weeks from baseline
followed up to 4,8,12 weeks from baseline
Changes in Raven Progressive Matrices(RPM) total score from baseline
Time Frame: followed up to 4,8,12 weeks from baseline
followed up to 4,8,12 weeks from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety(HAM-A) score from baseline
Time Frame: followed to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
followed to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
Changes in Clinical Clinical Global Impression- improvement(CGI-I)
Time Frame: followed to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
followed to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
Change in Response Rate from baseline
Time Frame: followed to 12 weeks from baseline
followed to 12 weeks from baseline
Change in Mini-Mental status examination(MMSE) total score from baseline
Time Frame: followed to 4,8,12 weeks from baseline
followed to 4,8,12 weeks from baseline
Change in Sexual Function Scale
Time Frame: followed to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
followed to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
Change in Clinical Global Impression- severity(CGI-S)
Time Frame: followed to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
followed to 2,4,8,12 weeks from baseline
Change in Remission Rate from baseline
Time Frame: followed to 12 weeks from baseline
followed to 12 weeks from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bum Hee Yu, Ph.D., Department of Pyschiatry, Sansung Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Tianeptine

Subscribe