Using an Electronic Personal Health Record to Empower Patients With Hypertension

March 16, 2011 updated by: Augusta University

Project Summary:

An electronic personal health record (ePHR) could maximize patient/clinician collaboration and consequently improve patient self-management and related health outcomes. The purpose of the proposed project is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of an ePHR that has been modified using a patient- and family-centered approach and incorporates the experiences, perspectives, and insights of patients and family members actually using the system. Comparison of patients with the ePHR intervention to a group of "care as usual" patients will be performed. The investigators Specific Aims are: (1) To improve the application of patient- and family-centered care elements in an existing ePHR, based on feedback from a pilot study of patients and their families. The modified ePHR will be tested in a pilot group of patients with hypertension and their families. (2) To implement and test the effectiveness of the modified ePHR with patients being treated for hypertension by a team of physicians, mid-level practitioners, nurse clinicians, and support staff in two ambulatory settings. Outcome measures will include patient activation and perception of care, quantifiable biological markers, patient-physician communication, and congruence of treatment with guidelines, particularly medication management; (3) To monitor the shift in provider and support staff awareness and incorporation of patient- and family-centered care as a result of implementation of the ePHR using questionnaires and focus groups. If successful, this ePHR could be implemented in additional locations in the Southeast.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

445

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Georgia Health Sciences University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 21
  • hypertension
  • referral by physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age over 80
  • no hypertension
  • too ill to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Received personal health record
received personal health record access
No Intervention: No personal health record
did not receive personal health record

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 9 months
2 seated measures taken using manual sphygmometer by trained research associate
9 months
Diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: 9 months
2 seated measures taken using manual sphygmometer by trained research associate
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient activation
Time Frame: 9 months
Patients complete the validated paper-and-pencil Patient Activation Measure (PAM) developed by Judy Hibbard. The instrument assesses the degree to which a patient is "activated," that is the degree to which they are an active agent in their own health care, e.g. ask questions of their health care provider.
9 months
Patient satisfaction with care
Time Frame: 9 months
Consumer Assessment of Health care--group and clinician survey Patient assessment of chronic care Post study interviews
9 months
adherence to guidelines
Time Frame: 9 months
chart audit of patient care
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peggy J Wagner, PhD, Augusta University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 17, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HS017234

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Electronic personal health record

Subscribe