The Post-Operative Pain Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Elbow Fractures

May 26, 2015 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

The goal of this study is to compare different ways of treating pain after surgery. This research study involves subjects who have a supracondylar elbow fracture and need surgery. This type of fracture occurs when the humerus (upper arm bone) is broken just above the elbow. Like any other surgery, you can expect that you will feel pain in the hours or days after the operation. Currently, despite the common occurrence of this surgery, there is not a standard way to treat and or prevent any of the pain afterwards.

At this hospital, oral (take by mouth) pain medicine is commonly used to treat pain after this surgery.

In this study, pain will be treated in one of the following ways:

  1. with oral pain medication
  2. with oral pain medicine and an intraarticular shot (a shot into the elbow joint) of bupivacaine (a "numbing" drug) or
  3. with oral pain medicine and an intraarticular shot of ropivacaine (another "numbing" drug). The shots will be given during surgery. Your participation will help us find out which of these three pain control methods works the best.

The correct dosages of all drugs will be safely prescribed by the doctor on an individual basis and all drugs will be used under the careful watch of your attending physician. All the drugs used this study are approved by the FDA for use in adults but they are not specifically approved for use in children. However, nearly 7 out of every 10 drugs approved for adults are not specifically approved by the FDA for use in children. All drugs used in this study will be used in a way that is considered to be safe and reasonable by the Children's Hospital.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose: In recent years, despite the lack of consistent evidence, the use of intraarticular (into the joint)injections during ambulatory, orthopaedic surgery has become a popular strategy for reducing post-operative pain. In this randomized, single center, prospective study the investigators will evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of intraarticular injections of local anesthesia during the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of supracondylar type elbow fractures (SCEFx) in children. In order to determine the efficacy of intraarticular injections, perceived post-operative pain will be compared among the three study groups receiving either a 0.25 % intraarticular injection of bupivacaine (Group 1 ), a 0.20% intraarticular injection of ropivacaine (Group 2) or no intraarticular injection (Control). All groups will receive the same post-operative oral pain medication of oxycodone (0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg) with acetaminophen.

Primary Aim(s) : Compare the primary and secondary pain outcomes variables in each of the three study groups.

  • The primary pain outcome variables are defined as the following:

    • Self-reported pain within 30-60 min. of arrival to the recovery room
    • Self-reported pain at two hours post-operative
  • The secondary pain outcome variables are defined as the following:

    • Parent perception of post-operative pain (scores of modified version of Foster and Varni's Total Quality of Pain Management Survey (TQPM) given in the first two hours after surgery)
    • Time t o first administration of oral pain medication
    • Total dose and frequency of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative
    • Dose (per kg) of local anesthetic received intra-operatively
    • Total dosage of all intra-operative analgesics (in morphine equivalents)
    • Pre-operative The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FSP-R) score

Hypotheses for Primary Aims:

  • There will not be a significant difference in any of the pain outcome variables amongst Groups 1 and 2.
  • There will be a statistically significant difference in each of the pain outcome variables when comparing; Group 1 and Control as well as Group 2 and Control.

Secondary Aim I: Evaluate the overall effect gender, ethnicity, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, fracture type and anesthesia time have on the pain outcome variables in this study population:

Hypotheses for Secondary Aim I: The investigators expect that age, gender, ASA classification, fracture type and anesthesia time will have a significant effect of on the primary and secondary pain outcome variables in this study population as a whole.

  • Participants aged 4-7 will be associated with more pain than participants aged 8-12 (increased selfreported pain scores, increased parent TQPM scores, decreased time to first administration of oral pain medication, increased total dosage of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative, increased frequency of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative).
  • Females will be associated with more pain than males (increased self-reported pain scores, increased parent TQPM scores, decreased time to first administration of oral pain medication, increased total dosage of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative, increased frequency of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative ) .
  • An ASA classification of III will be associated with more pain than a classification of I or II (increased self-reported pain scores, increased parent TQPM scores, decreased time to first administration of oral pain medication, increased total dosage of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative, increased frequency of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative),
  • A type III fracture type will be associated with more pain than a type I or II (increased selfreported pain scores, increased parent TQPM scores, decreased time to first administration of oral pain medication, increased total dosage of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative, increased frequency of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative).
  • An increase in anesthesia time will be associated with more pain . (increased self-reported pain scores, increased parent TQPM scores, decreased time to first administration of oral pain medication, increased total dosage of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative, increased frequency of oral pain medication taken during first 72 hours post-operative).

Secondary Aim II: Evaluate the overall effect that gender, ethnicity, age, ASA classification (I, II or III),fracture type and anesthesia time have on the pain outcome variables in each of the study groups (Compare 1, 2 and Control to study population as a whole).

Hypotheses for Secondary Aim II: The investigators anticipate that there will be no group difference in the effects that age, gender, ASA classification, fracture type or anesthesia time have on the primary and secondary pain outcome variables.

Secondary Aim III: Compare Group 1 and Group 2 for a potential dose dependent relationship between reported pain outcome variables and total dose of intraarticular injection.

Hypotheses for Secondary Aim III: In both groups, the investigators anticipate there will be a non-significant association between an increased dose of local anesthetic and decreased post-operative FSP-R scores. There will not be any difference in the significance of this dose dependent relationship between Group I and Group 2.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

124

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • The Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA class I, II or III
  • Patients 4-12 years old requiring general anesthesia for closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) of supracondylar type elbow fractures (SCEFx).
  • Patients able to understand and report their pain with the Faces Pain Scale Revised

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical contraindications to analgesic therapy.
  • Known allergy or sensitivity to analgesic agent.
  • Clinical evidence of skin inflammation precluding the 'clean' area at the site of injection.
  • Patients lacking the cognitive understanding to report their pain with the FSP-R (unable to complete seriation task).
  • Patients necessitating open reduction due to inability to obtain an acceptable closed reduction.
  • Comorbid diagnosis of other traumatic injury that causes any local and or global pain.
  • Patients presenting to ER with neurovascular injury or compartment syndrome due to fracture.
  • For patients in either of the two intervention arms, if after three attempts, the intraarticular injection is not successful, the patient will be dropped from the study.
  • Patients admitted for complications directly related to the surgery will be dropped from analysis. Any such event will be immediately reported to COMIRB with in five business days. However, patients admitted due to a late afternoon/evening surgery and patients admitted for standard observational purposes unrelated to surgical complications, will not be dropped from the study.
  • Known drug allergy to oxycodone and or acetaminophen.
  • Children 4-7 years old weighing less than 14 kg (Weight exclusion criteria is based on a 4 year old female that is below the fifth percentile for weight, per the Center for Disease Control Growth Charts).
  • Children 8-12 years old weighing less than 20 kg (Weight exclusion criteria based on an 8 year old female that is below the fifth percentile for weight, per the Center for Disease Control Growth Charts).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: The group receiving oral pain medicine
This group will receive Oxycodone with Acetaminophen orally
0.1- 0.15 mg/kg (oxycodone) every 4-6 hours as needed. Pills: 325 mg acetaminophen: 5 mg oxycodone per tablet. Liquid: 325 mg acetaminophen:5 mg oxycodone per 5 mL.
Other Names:
  • Percocet
Active Comparator: The group receiving bupivacaine and oral pain medicine
This group will receive an intra-articular shot during surgery and will then be sent to the recovery room to receive pain medication as needed.
  • Up to 4 ml at 0.25 % given to .. In toxic doses can lead to irregular heart beat, patients aged 4-7 (dose will be irregular heart rate and cardiac arrest. (This no greater than 0.71 mg/kg)
  • Up to 5 ml at 0.25 % by volume solution will be given to patients aged 8-12 (dose will be no greater than 0.63 mg/kg)
  • All doses given will be significantly less then maximum allowable dose of 2.5- 3.0 mg/kg
Other Names:
  • Marcaine
Active Comparator: The group receiving ropivacaine and oral pain medicine
This group will receive an intra-articular shot of ropivacaine during surgery and will be sent to the recovery room to receive pain medicine as needed.
  • Up to 4 ml at 0.20 % given to patients aged 4-7 (dose will be no greater than 0.57 mg/kg)
  • Up to 5 ml at 0.20 % by volume solution will be given to patients aged 8-1(dose will be no greater than 0.50 mg/kg)
  • All doses given will be significantly less then maximum allowable dose of 2.5- 3.0 mg/kg
Other Names:
  • Naropin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FSP-R) Scores (Scored 0-10).
Time Frame: Will be obtained 30 - 60 minutes after arrival to the recovery room
The Faces Pain Scale Revised is a dimensionless 10 point likert scale used to assess self-reported pain intensity on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most pain you can imagine). Greater pain scores are indicative of more severe pain.
Will be obtained 30 - 60 minutes after arrival to the recovery room

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Quality Pain Management Survey (TQPM) Scores for Questions # 16: Child's Current Level of Pain, Question # 17: Child's Worst Level of Pain When Moving Around After Surgery and Question # 18: Child's Worst Level of Pain While Resting
Time Frame: Will be obtained from parent(s) 120 minutes after arrival to the recovery room
Total quality pain management survey is validated survey used to assess parents' perceptions of their child's pain. Pain is assessed on a dimensionless 10 pt likert scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Greater pain scores are indicative or more severe pain.
Will be obtained from parent(s) 120 minutes after arrival to the recovery room
Time (in Minutes) to First Narcotic Administration
Time Frame: first 72 hours after surgery close time
first 72 hours after surgery close time
Total Dosage in Morphine Equivalents (mg/kg) of All Analgesics Received in Prior to Discharge
Time Frame: Analgesic data collected during first four hours following the end of surgery (surgery close)
Analgesic data collected during first four hours following the end of surgery (surgery close)
Need for IV Morphine of Fentanyl
Time Frame: First 120 minutes after the end of surgery (surgery close time)
Indicates that number of subjects that were in severe pain and thus required IV morphine and/or fentanyl.
First 120 minutes after the end of surgery (surgery close time)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elbow Fracture

Clinical Trials on Oxycodone with Acetaminophen

Subscribe