- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01330381
Prucalopride in Pediatric Subjects With Functional Constipation (FC)
May 29, 2021 updated by: Shire
Trial Consisting of an 8-week Double-blind Placebo-controlled Part to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Prucalopride in Paediatric Subjects With Functional Constipation, Aged ≥6 Months to <18 Years, Followed by a 16-week Open-label Comparator (PEG) Controlled Part, to Document Safety and Tolerability up to 24 Weeks
To evaluate the efficacy of prucalopride compared to placebo for the treatment of functional constipation in a paediatric population, aged ≥ 6 months to < 18 years.
A 16-week open-label comparator (PEG) controlled part will follow, to document safety and tolerability up to 24 weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
215
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
- Academisch Medisch Centrum
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
6 months to 17 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Main Inclusion Criteria:
- Boys and girls, aged ≥ 6 months and < 18 years.
- Subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of functional constipation as defined by the Rome III criteria.
Main Exclusion Criteria:
- Children with underlying GI abnormalities and causes for defecation disorders.
- Constipation is thought to be drug-induced.
- Subjects suffering from secondary causes of chronic constipation.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
Matching oral solution or oral tablets given once daily
|
|
Experimental: prucalopride
drug
|
prucalopride
|
|
Active Comparator: PEG 4000
4-20g administered as an oral solution once daily
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Responders in the Last Four Weeks of the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
|
Responders are defined as subjects with an average spontaneous defecation frequency is ≥3 times per week AND the average number of fecal incontinence episodes per 2 weeks is ≤ 1 episode (only for subjects after acquisition of toileting skills).
|
Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Subjects With Bowel Frequency of 3 or More Spontaneous Bowel Movements (SBM) Per Week in the Last Four Weeks of the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
|
Spontaneous Bowel Movements defined as a bowel movement that is not preceded within a period of 24 hours by the intake of a laxative agent or by the use of an enema.
|
Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
|
|
Percent of Subjects With Fecal Incontinence Episodes of 1 or Less Per 2 Weeks in the Last Four Weeks of the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
|
Fecal incontinence is a lack of control over defecation, leading to involuntary loss of bowel contents (only for subjects after acquisition of toileting skills).
|
Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
|
|
Number of Retentive Posturing or Excessive Volitional Stool Retention in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Purposefully avoiding defecation.
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
Painful Bowel Movements Score in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Pain was rated on a 6-point scale (0=no hurt, 1=hurts little bit, 2=hurts little more, 3=hurts even more, 4=hurts whole lot, 5=hurts worst) in subjects of 3 years and older.
Lower scores represent less pain.
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
Stool Consistency Per SBM Score in Children Without Diapers in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Measured using the 7-point Bristol scale where 1-2 indicate constipation, 3-4 are ideal stools, and 5-7 tending toward diarrhea.
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
Stool Consistency Per SBM Score in Children With Diapers in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Measured on a 4-point scale where 1 is constipation, 2-3 is ideal, and 4 is diarrhea.
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
Large Diameter Stools in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Large diameter stools make defecation more difficult.
Small diameter stools are better.
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
Abdominal Pain Score in Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Pain was rated on a 6-point scale (0=no hurt, 1=hurts little bit, 2=hurts little more, 3=hurts even more, 4=hurts whole lot, 5=hurts worst) in subjects of 3 years and older.
Lower scores represent less pain.
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
Frequency of Toilet Training in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Only for subjects after acquisition of toileting skills.
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
Number of Rescue Medications Taken in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
|
Time to First SBM in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Day 1 onwards
|
After intake of the trial medication on Day 1.
|
Day 1 onwards
|
|
Number of SBM Per Week in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Number of SBM Per Week Over the 8 Week Double Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Baseline and over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Baseline and over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
|
Severity of Constipation Over the Past 2 Weeks for the Final On Treatment Assessment in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
|
|
Severity of Constipation Over the Past 2 Weeks for the Final On Treatment Assessment in the Open-Label Treatment Period
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
2 weeks
|
|
|
Efficacy of Treatment for Final On Treatment Assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
|
|
|
Efficacy of Treatment for Final On Treatment Assessment in Open-Label Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 16 week open label treatment period
|
Over the 16 week open label treatment period
|
|
|
Convenience of Treatment for Final On Treatment Assessment in Open-Label Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 16 week open label treatment period
|
Over the 16 week open label treatment period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Mugie SM, Korczowski B, Bodi P, Green A, Kerstens R, Ausma J, Ruth M, Levine A, Benninga MA. Prucalopride is no more effective than placebo for children with functional constipation. Gastroenterology. 2014 Dec;147(6):1285-95.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
- van Schaick E, Benninga MA, Levine A, Magnusson M, Troy S. Development of a population pharmacokinetic model of prucalopride in children with functional constipation. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016 Jun 1;4(4):e00236. doi: 10.1002/prp2.236. eCollection 2016 Aug.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 28, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 5, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
April 6, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 10, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 29, 2021
Last Verified
May 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SPD555-303
- M0001-C303 (Other Identifier: Movetis)
- 2010-022402-40 (EudraCT Number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Functional Constipation
-
Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM HospitalNot yet recruitingFunctional Constipation | Constipation - Functional | Constipation Chronic Idiopathic | Fecal Impaction | Pediatric Functional ConstipationIndia
-
Wecare Probiotics Co., Ltd.Not yet recruiting
-
Federal University of Minas GeraisMax NutriRecruiting
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalInstitute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of SciencesNot yet recruitingChronic Constipation | Constipation - Functional | Fecal Microbiota TransplantationChina
-
Liaquat University of Medical & Health SciencesUniversità degli Studi dell'InsubriaNot yet recruiting
-
Universidad de AntioquiaNot yet recruitingConstipation - Functional
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversitySehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research HospitalCompletedConstipation - FunctionalTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ahi Evran University Education and Research HospitalActive, not recruitingConstipation - FunctionalTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalRecruitingChronic Constipation | Constipation - Functional | Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT)China
-
Zeynep Idil SevimliNot yet recruitingFunctional Constipation (FC)Turkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on prucalopride
-
MovetisCompleted
-
Future University in EgyptRecruitingPost-Op ComplicationEgypt
-
KU LeuvenUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompletedPostoperative IleusBelgium
-
Boston Children's HospitalRecruitingEsophageal Motility Disorders | Gastro Esophageal Reflux | Aspiration Pneumonia | Gastric Motor DysfunctionUnited States
-
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka...RecruitingPatient SatisfactionBangladesh
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenTerminated
-
MovetisCompleted
-
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka...RecruitingIrritable Bowel SyndromeBangladesh
-
ShireCompleted