Prucalopride in Pediatric Subjects With Functional Constipation (FC)

May 29, 2021 updated by: Shire

Trial Consisting of an 8-week Double-blind Placebo-controlled Part to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Prucalopride in Paediatric Subjects With Functional Constipation, Aged ≥6 Months to <18 Years, Followed by a 16-week Open-label Comparator (PEG) Controlled Part, to Document Safety and Tolerability up to 24 Weeks

To evaluate the efficacy of prucalopride compared to placebo for the treatment of functional constipation in a paediatric population, aged ≥ 6 months to < 18 years. A 16-week open-label comparator (PEG) controlled part will follow, to document safety and tolerability up to 24 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

215

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Academisch Medisch Centrum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Boys and girls, aged ≥ 6 months and < 18 years.
  2. Subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of functional constipation as defined by the Rome III criteria.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Children with underlying GI abnormalities and causes for defecation disorders.
  2. Constipation is thought to be drug-induced.
  3. Subjects suffering from secondary causes of chronic constipation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Matching oral solution or oral tablets given once daily
Experimental: prucalopride
drug

prucalopride

  • subjects with weight ≤50kg: 0.04 mg/kg once daily as oral solution of 0.4 mg/ml
  • subjects with weight >50 kg: prucalopride 2 mg tablet once daily
Active Comparator: PEG 4000
4-20g administered as an oral solution once daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Responders in the Last Four Weeks of the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
Responders are defined as subjects with an average spontaneous defecation frequency is ≥3 times per week AND the average number of fecal incontinence episodes per 2 weeks is ≤ 1 episode (only for subjects after acquisition of toileting skills).
Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Subjects With Bowel Frequency of 3 or More Spontaneous Bowel Movements (SBM) Per Week in the Last Four Weeks of the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
Spontaneous Bowel Movements defined as a bowel movement that is not preceded within a period of 24 hours by the intake of a laxative agent or by the use of an enema.
Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
Percent of Subjects With Fecal Incontinence Episodes of 1 or Less Per 2 Weeks in the Last Four Weeks of the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
Fecal incontinence is a lack of control over defecation, leading to involuntary loss of bowel contents (only for subjects after acquisition of toileting skills).
Last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment period
Number of Retentive Posturing or Excessive Volitional Stool Retention in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Purposefully avoiding defecation.
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Painful Bowel Movements Score in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Pain was rated on a 6-point scale (0=no hurt, 1=hurts little bit, 2=hurts little more, 3=hurts even more, 4=hurts whole lot, 5=hurts worst) in subjects of 3 years and older. Lower scores represent less pain.
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Stool Consistency Per SBM Score in Children Without Diapers in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Measured using the 7-point Bristol scale where 1-2 indicate constipation, 3-4 are ideal stools, and 5-7 tending toward diarrhea.
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Stool Consistency Per SBM Score in Children With Diapers in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Measured on a 4-point scale where 1 is constipation, 2-3 is ideal, and 4 is diarrhea.
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Large Diameter Stools in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Large diameter stools make defecation more difficult. Small diameter stools are better.
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Abdominal Pain Score in Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Pain was rated on a 6-point scale (0=no hurt, 1=hurts little bit, 2=hurts little more, 3=hurts even more, 4=hurts whole lot, 5=hurts worst) in subjects of 3 years and older. Lower scores represent less pain.
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Frequency of Toilet Training in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Only for subjects after acquisition of toileting skills.
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Number of Rescue Medications Taken in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Time to First SBM in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Day 1 onwards
After intake of the trial medication on Day 1.
Day 1 onwards
Number of SBM Per Week in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Change From Baseline in the Number of SBM Per Week Over the 8 Week Double Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Baseline and over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Baseline and over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Severity of Constipation Over the Past 2 Weeks for the Final On Treatment Assessment in the Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Severity of Constipation Over the Past 2 Weeks for the Final On Treatment Assessment in the Open-Label Treatment Period
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Efficacy of Treatment for Final On Treatment Assessment in Double-Blind Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Over the 8 week double blind treatment period
Efficacy of Treatment for Final On Treatment Assessment in Open-Label Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 16 week open label treatment period
Over the 16 week open label treatment period
Convenience of Treatment for Final On Treatment Assessment in Open-Label Treatment Period
Time Frame: Over the 16 week open label treatment period
Over the 16 week open label treatment period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 28, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Functional Constipation

Clinical Trials on prucalopride

Subscribe