Lactated Ringer Versus Albumin in Early Sepsis Therapy (RASP)

April 3, 2018 updated by: Juliano P Almeida, MD, PhD, University of Sao Paulo

Ringer Versus Albumin In Septic Patients: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The use of albumin in critical ill patients is a matter of controversy. A large randomized controlled trial reported that albumin was as safe and effective as crystalloid solution for fluid replacement in intensive care unit, although the last one was less expensive. In Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines there are no preference for crystalloids over colloids. But recently, a retrospective analysis of patients with severe sepsis from SAFE study reported that the use of albumin in these patients would be superior, regarding reduction of mortality. The aim of this study is determine whether the use of albumin improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

360

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sao Paulo/SP
      • Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo/SP, Brazil, 01246000
        • Cancer Institute of Sao Paulo, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age equal or higher than 18 years-old
  • Severe sepsis or septic shock into 6 hours of evolution
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Shock from other causes
  • Adverse reactions to human albumin
  • Previous fluid resuscitation during current disease
  • Previous use of albumin in the last 72 hours
  • Religion objection
  • Enrollment in another study
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Hepatic cirrhosis
  • End stage renal disease
  • Plasmapheresis
  • End of life patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Lactated Ringer
Patients randomized for this group will receive 500 ml of lactated Ringer solution in early phase of sepsis or septic shock (less than six hour from sepsis onset) if mean arterial pressure was under 65mmHg, or blood lactate concentration higher than 4 mmol/L or base excess under - 4mmol/L until the target of central venous pressure of 8 mmHg or higher or recovery of hypotension.
Lactated Ringer
Active Comparator: Albumin
Patients randomized for Albumin group will receive 500 ml of 4% Albumin solution in early phase of sepsis (less than six hour from sepsis onset) if mean arterial pressure was under 65mmHg or blood lactate concentration higher than 4 mmol/L or base excess under - 4mmol/L until the target of central venous pressure of 8 mmHg or higher or recovery of hypotension.
Albumin 4%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality in 7 days for any cause
Time Frame: day 7
day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: day 28
day 28
hospital length of stay
Time Frame: day 28
day 28
Evaluation of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score
Time Frame: from day 1 until day 7 of care in ICU
from day 1 until day 7 of care in ICU
ventilator-free days
Time Frame: day 28
day 28
Needing of renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: day 28
day 28
days free of vasopressor
Time Frame: day 28
day 28
Mortality in 28-days
Time Frame: 28 days after randomization
28 days after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Juliano A Almeida, MD, University of São Paulo
  • Study Director: Ludhmila Hajjar, PhD, University of São Paulo
  • Principal Investigator: Clarice H Park, MD, University of São Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 19, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on Lactated Ringer

3
Subscribe