Assessment and Prevention of Acute Post-herniotomy Pain (PTSM04APHP)

May 21, 2014 updated by: Massimo Allegri, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo

Randomized, Prospective Study of the Assessment, Prevention and Management of Acute Post-herniotomy Pain

The aim of the study is the assessment and management of Acute Post-herniotomy Pain using two different therapeutical protocols per os: ketorolac versus association of acetaminophene+tramadol.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Persistent post-herniotomy pain (PPP) affects everyday activities in 5-10% of patients. Even brief intervals of acute pain can induce long-term neuronal remodeling and sensitization, chronic pain and lasting psychological distress. Chronic pain may be caused by intense acute PPP, intraoperative nerve injury and/or ongoing inflammation or mesh response with subsequence damage to nerve structures. The aim of our study is to analyze analgesic efficacy, safety and prevention of persistent postsurgical pain of two different pharmacological strategies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lomabardy
      • Pavia, Lomabardy, Italy, 27100
        • IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
    • Lombardy
      • Varese, Lombardy, Italy, 21100
        • Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females over 18 years, under 80 years, scheduled for elective herniotomy
  • Classification American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I: without systemic disease
  • Classification ASA II or III (mild systemic disease or severe systemic disease that limits the activity without invalidity).
  • Patients with hernia typ 2, 3a, 3b (classification NYHUS (1993))
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA III, IV
  • Emergency surgery
  • Recovery in intensive care unit after surgery
  • habitual opioid consumption
  • NSADs allergy
  • cognitive or mental alterations
  • coagulopathy
  • piastrinemia < 100.000/mm3

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: ketorolac
Patients will be given intraoperative analgesia with Ketorolac and tramadol before the the end of surgery, then Ketorolac postoperative 10mg 1cp x 3/die, from the day of surgery for 4 days after surgery.
Ketorolac 10mg 1cp x 3/die
Other Names:
  • Toradol
ketorolac 30 mg iv
Other Names:
  • Ketorolac
Tramadol 100 mg if Weight over 50 kg, 50 mg if weight below 50 kg
Other Names:
  • Tramadol
Other: acetaminophene+tramadol
Patients will be given intraoperative analgesia with Ketorolac and tramadol before the the end of surgery, then postoperative Patrol (acetaminophene 325mg+tramadol 37,5mg) 1cp x 3/die for 4 days after surgery.
ketorolac 30 mg iv
Other Names:
  • Ketorolac
Tramadol 100 mg if Weight over 50 kg, 50 mg if weight below 50 kg
Other Names:
  • Tramadol
acetaminophene 325mg+tramadol 37.5mg, 1cp x 3/die
Other Names:
  • Patrol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesic Efficacy
Time Frame: 4 days postherniotomy

percentage of patients with NRS≥4. (NRS=numeric rating scale; o quantify pain from0=no pain to 10=worst pain possible).

NRS≥4 is cosidered as suboptimal pain control worth to be treated with adjunctive analgesics. We therefore condidered the difference in percentage of patients experiencing not optimal pain control in the two groups to understand, if any, the difference in analgesic efficacy between the two drugs.

4 days postherniotomy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: 4 days postherniotoy

All adverse events (eg: PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting), itching, dizziness, epigastralgia) are recorded.

Assessment of any difference between the two groups.

4 days postherniotoy
Difference in Recovering Daily Activity
Time Frame: 4 days after surgical procedure
Assessment of the difference in recovering daily activity in terms of NRSm (Numeric Rate Scale at movement)
4 days after surgical procedure
Assessment of Any Connections Between the Two Therapeutical Strategies and the Recurrence of Surgical Complications
Time Frame: 4 days postherniotomy

Assessment of the recurrence of surgical complications. Evaluation of all the patients after 5 days by clinical evaluation. After 1 and 3 month in the patients who refer pain.

Assessment of any difference between the two groups.

4 days postherniotomy
Development of Persistent Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Assessment of pain prevalence and presentation of persistant postoperative pain. Evaluation of all the patients after 1 and 3 months by phone call and with clinical re-evaluation in all patients who referred pain.
Up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fabrizio Cavalloro, MD, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hernia

Clinical Trials on Ketorolac postoperative

Subscribe