Tissue Characterisation by Endoscopic GI-elastography

September 4, 2012 updated by: Roald Flesland Havre, Haukeland University Hospital

Tissue Characterisation Using Ultrasound Based Strain Imaging(Elastography)Examining Lesions in the Gastrointestinal Wall, Adjacent Lymph Nodes and Pancreatic Lesions

In this single centre study we study the use of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) combined with elastography in order to separate malignant tissue from benign tissue in and adjacent to the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to use endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with strain based elastography to identify strain traits separating malignant from benign lesions. We are registering feasibility of endoscopic strain imaging and compare diagnostic accuracy of EUS + elastography with previous data on EUS alone.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Group 1: Focal subepithelial lesions in esophageal, ventricular or duodenal wall discovered by endoscopy or other imaging modality.
  • Group 2: Pancreatic lesion discovered by other imaging modality.
  • Group 3: Mediastinal or retroperitoneal lymph node or tumor discovered by other imaging modality.

Histology of lesions should not be known at the time of examination. EUS elastography findings are evaluated shortly after the examination and categorised by different methods; categorical score, VAS, Strain Ratio. The result is then compared to histology or cytology results. Patients who do not undergo tissue sampling are followed up to discover disease progress.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

137

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bergen, Norway, 5021
        • Haukeland University Hospital/University of Bergen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients referred to EUS examination or relevant surgery at Haukeland University Hospital, bergen, Norway within the inclusion period (2007- January 2011).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Solid focal lesions in pancreas or pancreatitis
  • Intramural lesions in esophagus, ventricle or duodenum
  • Lymph nodes or tumour > 1 cm in mediastinum or retroperitoneum accessible by EUS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cystic pancreatic lesions
  • Patients where the histology or cytology of the lesion in question is known at the time of examination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Pancreatic lesions

Any patient with a solid pancreatic lesion of unknown histology may be recruited. Cystic lesions are not included.

Elastography findings are classified and compared to cytology or histology if the standard procedures or treatment provide this. In other cases the patients are being followed up conservatively.

Intramural upper GI-lesions
Patients with intramural lesions discovered by endoscopy or other imaging modalities are recruited. Elastography findings are classified and compared to cytology or histology if the standard procedures or treatment provide this. In other cases the patients are being followed up conservatively.
Lymph nodes
Patients with visible mediastinal lymph nodes or retroperitoneal lymph nodes in patients with inflammatory or malignant diseases are recruited. Elastography findings are classified and compared to cytology or histology if the standard procedures or treatment provide this. In other cases the patients are being followed up conservatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Malignant or benign lesion
Time Frame: Jan 2007 - September 2011 + 6 months( if no tissue sample)(4 years)
Imaged lesions are sampled, surgically removed or followed up > 6 months to conclude on their nature. Images are evaluated, measured and categorised shortly after examination and compared to histological, cytological or follow up result. Elastography results do not interfere with surgical or oncological treatment planning in this study.
Jan 2007 - September 2011 + 6 months( if no tissue sample)(4 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Description of lesion elasticity
Time Frame: 2007- September 2011 (4 years)
To identify softer and harder areas within and adjacent to focal lesions which could identify smooth surface, necrotic centre, regional fibrosis or regional cacncer.
2007- September 2011 (4 years)
Value of Strain Ratio measurements
Time Frame: 2007 - September 2011 (4 years)
Strain ratio provides opportunity to compare strain in user selected areas of the elastogram. This is a semi-quantification of strain differences and may be useful for a better distinction between malignant ond non-malignant lesions.
2007 - September 2011 (4 years)
Value of colour and pattern category
Time Frame: 2007 - September 2011 (4 years)
Categorisation of images of lesions using a published categorising scheme and comparision to cytology, histology or follow up.
2007 - September 2011 (4 years)
Value of a Visual Analog Scale for strain image categorisation
Time Frame: 2007 - September 2011 (4 years)
Evaluation of the use of a simple 100 mm Visual analog scale to classify if lesion appears softer, equal to or harder than the surrounding tissue is useful for creating semiquantitative cut-off levels between malignant and benign lesions.
2007 - September 2011 (4 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lars Birger Nesje, MD, PhD, University of Bergen
  • Principal Investigator: Roald F. Havre, MD, University of Bergen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 25, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Lymph Node

Subscribe