- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02156414
Lymph Node Involvement Using Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer (LNIEPLCLPC)
April 21, 2015 updated by: Jose Gustavo Ramos, Javeriana University
Lymph Node Involvement Using Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in Bogota Colombia.
Prostate cancer is considered the fourth most common malignancy cancer in America.
However, in Colombia the incidence is higher, and it is considered the second cause of death among men for malignance diseases.
In the framework of clinical localized prostate cancer there is a controversy regarding the best predictors of risk and the best treatment options.
The actual literature is discussing the possibility of underestimate the disease and actual tools are not sufficient for proper characterization.
Is in this context that extended pelvic lymphadenectomy emerges as a stratification tool in prostate cancer that defines the real commitment of the disease.
The investigators need to know the characteristics that the disease has on the investigators community so the investigators can generate appropriate therapeutic approach.
Thus, the present prospective observational-descriptive multicenter study, want to determine in three referral centers in Bogotá Colombia , the frequency of pelvic node involvement in patients with localized clinical prostate cancer from the stratification achieved by pelvic lymphadenectomy extended.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
135
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bogota, Colombia, 110911
- Fundación Cardioinfantil
-
Bogota, Colombia, 110911
- Fundacion Hospital Santafe
-
Bogota, Colombia, 110911
- Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Male
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients with clinical localized prostate cancer who undergo a radical prostatectomy in the 3 centers.
Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Hospital Fundacion Santa fe de Bogota, Fundacion Cardioinfantil.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with clinical localized prostate cancer
- Clinical stage: cT1-cT2-, N0-Nx, M0-Mx
- Patients who undergo radical prostatectomy and extended lymphadenectomy in one of the 3 centers of reference.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients in which the standard technique of the extended lymphadenectomy could not be done and it was changed.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Clinically Localized Prostatic Neoplasm
Radical Prostatectomy Extended Lymphadenectomy
|
Radical Prostatectomy
Extended Lymphadenectomy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Lymph Node Involvement Using Extended Pelvic Lymphadenectomy by histopathology analysis
Time Frame: within the first 30 days after surgery
|
After extended pelvic lymphadenectomy the nodes are classified in ilio-obturator nodes and internal iliaca nodes.
Then those nodes are send to the pathology department of the each center, and by the histopathology analysis, the pathologist determine which nodes are compromised.
With the histopathology result, the investigators report de nodal involvement.
|
within the first 30 days after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Histopathology substaging Gleason score in the surgery piece vs Biopsy report before surgery.
Time Frame: Within the first 30 days after surgery
|
After radical prostatectomy the specimen (prostate) is send to the pathology department of each center, and by the histopathology analysis, the pathologist determine the gleason score.
Then the investigators compare this result to the one achieved in the biopsy result, and determine if there was a oncologic substaging related to the gleason score.
|
Within the first 30 days after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: JOSE G RAMOS, MF, Javeriana University
- Study Director: JUAN G CATAÑO, MD, Javeriana University
- Study Chair: LUIS G VILLARRAGA, MD, Javeriana University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Kaplan I, Beard CJ, Wein A. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):969-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.969.
- Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Mottet N, Schmid HP, van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F. [EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part I: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease]. Actas Urol Esp. 2011 Oct;35(9):501-14. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Jul 14. Spanish.
- Delahunt B, Miller RJ, Srigley JR, Evans AJ, Samaratunga H. Gleason grading: past, present and future. Histopathology. 2012 Jan;60(1):75-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04003.x.
- Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A, Gallina A, Zanni G, Scattoni V, Valiquette L, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI. Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.008.
- Abdollah F, Sun M, Suardi N, Gallina A, Capitanio U, Bianchi M, Tutolo M, Passoni N, Karakiewicz PI, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Briganti A; National Comprehensive Cancer Network. National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines 2011: Need for more accurate recommendations for pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.129. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
- Abdollah F, Sun M, Briganti A, Thuret R, Schmitges J, Gallina A, Suardi N, Capitanio U, Salonia A, Shariat SF, Perrotte P, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI. Critical assessment of the European Association of Urology guideline indications for pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1769-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10204.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
- Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B, Busby JE, D'Amico A, Eastham JA, Enke CA, George D, Horwitz EM, Huben RP, Kantoff P, Kawachi M, Kuettel M, Lange PH, Macvicar G, Plimack ER, Pow-Sang JM, Roach M 3rd, Rohren E, Roth BJ, Shrieve DC, Smith MR, Srinivas S, Twardowski P, Walsh PC. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Feb;8(2):162-200. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0012. No abstract available.
- Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, Cookson MS, D'Amico AV, Dmochowski RR, Eton DT, Forman JD, Goldenberg SL, Hernandez J, Higano CS, Kraus SR, Moul JW, Tangen CM; AUA Prostate Cancer Clinical Guideline Update Panel. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2106-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.003. No abstract available.
- Gacci M, Del Popolo G, Artibani W, Tubaro A, Palli D, Vittori G, Lapini A, Serni S, Carini M. Visual assessment of uroflowmetry curves: description and interpretation by urodynamists. World J Urol. 2007 Jun;25(3):333-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0165-8. Epub 2007 Apr 14.
- Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol. 2005 Mar;16(3):481-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi098. Epub 2005 Feb 17.
- Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459.
- Miki J, Egawa S. The role of lymph node dissection in the management of prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun;16(3):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0245-z. Epub 2011 May 10.
- Wagner M, Sokoloff M, Daneshmand S. The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer--therapeutic? J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.027.
- Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL; ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Sep;29(9):1228-42. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1. No abstract available.
- Harnden P, Shelley MD, Coles B, Staffurth J, Mason MD. Should the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer be modified to account for high-grade tertiary components? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2007 May;8(5):411-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70136-5.
- D'Amico AV, Cote K, Loffredo M, Renshaw AA, Schultz D. Determinants of prostate cancer-specific survival after radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec 1;20(23):4567-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.061.
- Allaf ME, Palapattu GS, Trock BJ, Carter HB, Walsh PC. Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1840-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000140912.45821.1d.
- Bader P, Burkhard FC, Markwalder R, Studer UE. Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):849-54. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049032.38743.c7.
- Clark T, Parekh DJ, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Smith ER Jr, Wells N, Smith J Jr. Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):145-7; discussion 147-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000039647.16278.17.
- Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH, Graefen M, Heidenreich A, Karnes JR, Montorsi F, Studer UE. Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
- Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, Mottet N, Schmid HP, van der Kwast T, Wiegel T, Zattoni F; European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.039. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
- Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Rabbani F, Gerigk C, Reuter V, Graefen M, Hammerer PG, Erbersdobler A, Huland H, Kupelian P, Klein E, Quinn DI, Henshall SM, Grygiel JJ, Sutherland RL, Stricker PD, Morash CG, Scardino PT, Kattan MW. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1798-803. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091805.98960.13.
- Abdollah F, Sun M, Thuret R, Budaus L, Jeldres C, Graefen M, Briganti A, Perrotte P, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI. Decreasing rate and extent of lymph node staging in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy may undermine the rate of diagnosis of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010 Dec;58(6):882-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.09.029. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
- Bhatta-Dhar N, Reuther AM, Zippe C, Klein EA. No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer. Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):528-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.064.
- Hyndman ME, Mullins JK, Pavlovich CP. Pelvic node dissection in prostate cancer: extended, limited, or not at all? Curr Opin Urol. 2010 May;20(3):211-7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328338405d.
- Gerstenbluth RE, Seftel AD, Hampel N, Oefelein MG, Resnick MI. The accuracy of the increased prostate specific antigen level (greater than or equal to 20 ng./ml.) in predicting prostate cancer: is biopsy always required? J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):1990-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000033330.06269.6d.
- Brawley OW. Prostate cancer epidemiology in the United States. World J Urol. 2012 Apr;30(2):195-200. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0824-2. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
August 1, 2014
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
August 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 3, 2014
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
June 5, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
April 22, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2015
Last Verified
April 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 7-2013
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prostatic Neoplasms
-
Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate...Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, AustraliaRecruitingCastration Resistant Prostatic CancerAustralia
-
Technische Universität DresdenRecruitingOligometastatic Disease | Prostatic Cancer, Castration-ResistantGermany
-
British Columbia Cancer AgencySanofi; Ozmosis Research Inc.UnknownMetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostatic CancerCanada, Australia
-
Yinghao SunNot yet recruitingCastration-Resistant Prostatic Cancer
-
Institut Claudius RegaudWithdrawnProstatic Cancer, Castration-ResistantFrance
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedCastration-Resistant Prostatic NeoplasmsCanada, Belgium, United States, Spain, Netherlands, Italy, Russian Federation
-
Universität des SaarlandesRecruitingProstate Cancer Metastatic | Advanced Prostate Carcinoma | Castration Resistant Prostatic CancerGermany
-
University Hospital, GrenobleTerminatedCastration-resistant Prostate CancerFrance
-
Michael Graham PhD, MDUniversity of Iowa; Holden Comprehensive Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingProstate Cancer | Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant | Prostatic Neoplasm | Prostatic Cancer Recurrent | Prostatic Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
Rio de Janeiro State UniversityCompletedProstatic Cancer | Prostatic NeoplasmBrazil
Clinical Trials on Radical Prostatectomy
-
University of LeipzigHeinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf; University Hospital Heidelberg; Klinikum...Completed
-
Mayo ClinicTerminatedAdenocarcinoma | Prostatic NeoplasmsUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknownCancer of the PROSTATEFrance
-
Tampere University HospitalSeinajoki Central HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
University of MichiganCompleted
-
Rio de Janeiro State UniversityCompletedProstatic Cancer | Prostatic NeoplasmBrazil
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingLocally Advanced and Metastatic Prostate CancerAustria
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleActive, not recruiting
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality...Completed