Lexapro for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Depression & Other Psychiatric Conditions

August 31, 2016 updated by: Vani Rao, MD, Johns Hopkins University

Escitalopram (Lexapro) for the Treatment of TBI Depression and Other Comorbid Psychiatric Conditions

This research is being done to see if a drug called escitalopram (Lexapro) is helpful to people who are suffering from depression after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Despite it's high prevalence, little is known about the pharmacological treatment of depression following Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). This is because of a lack of randomized controlled studies in the treatment of post-TBI depression. This study is designed to examine the safety and effectiveness of escitalopram in the treatment of post-TBI depression. It will also investigate metabolic changes and neural pathways associated with post-TBI depression and metabolic alterations after treatment through neuroimaging.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Closed head injury
  • Fulfill Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Diploma in Social Medicine (DSM) IV criteria "Major Depressive Disorder"
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Stable medical history

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Stroke, Encephalitis, Seizures, or any other pre-TBI neurological diseases
  • History of mental retardation
  • Alcohol or Substance dependence in the last 1 year
  • Inability to undergo MRI scan
  • Pregnancy
  • Current use of any psychotropic medications including any antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, or sedative hypnotics
  • Poor response to escitalopram in the past
  • Acutely suicidal or requiring inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, as determined by the study psychiatrist
  • Good medication response to another antidepressant in the past

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Daily for 12 weeks
Sugar pill placebo
Other Names:
  • sugar pill
Experimental: Escitalopram
Escitalopram 10 mg or 20 mg daily for 12 weeks
Escitalopram 10 mg or 20 mg daily for 12 weeks by mouth
Other Names:
  • Lexapro

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at Baseline
Time Frame: MADRS score at baseline

This scale assesses the range of symptoms most frequently observed in patients with major depression. This measure will be used to assess the difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline and 12 weeks. The scores range from 0-60.

0 to 6 - normal; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; >34 - severe depression.

In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.

MADRS score at baseline
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: MADRS score at 12 weeks

This scale assesses the range of symptoms most frequently observed in patients with major depression. This measure will be used to assess the difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline and 12 weeks. The scores range from 0-60.

0 to 6 - normal; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; >34 - severe depression.

In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.

MADRS score at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Severity at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline

This outcome measure is assessing the participant's overall psychiatric health based upon the CGI score as assessed by the investigator. Scores range from 1-7

  1. = Normal-not at all ill
  2. = Borderline mentally ill
  3. = Mildly ill
  4. = Moderately ill
  5. = Markedly ill
  6. = Severely ill
  7. = Among the most extremely ill patients.
Baseline
Clinical Global Impression (CGI)- Improvement
Time Frame: at 12 weeks

This outcome measure is assessing the participant's overall psychiatric health based upon the CGI score as assessed by the investigator.

The scores range from 1-7

  1. = Very much improved
  2. = Much improved
  3. = Minimally improved
  4. = No change
  5. = Minimally worse
  6. = Much worse
  7. = Very much worse
at 12 weeks
Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)
Time Frame: Baseline

This outcome measure is assessing the participant's anxiety as assessed by the CAS.

The scores range from 0( normal; no anxiety) to 21 ( severe anxiety). It is used as a continuous variable.

Baseline
Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks

This outcome measure is assessing the participant's anxiety as assessed by the CAS.

The scores range from 0( normal; no anxiety) to 21 ( severe anxiety). It is used as a continuous variable.

12 weeks
Satisfaction With Life (SWL)
Time Frame: baseline

This outcome measure asses the participants overall satisfaction with life as measured by the SWL scale.

The scores range from 5 ( absolutely no satisfaction ) to 35 ( very satisfied with life).

It is used as continuous variable.

baseline
Satisfaction With Life (SWL)
Time Frame: 12 weeks

This outcome measure asses the participants overall satisfaction with life as measured by the SWL scale.

The scores range from 5 ( absolutely no satisfaction ) to 35 ( very satisfied with life).

It is used as continuous variable.

12 weeks
Quality of Life (QWL)
Time Frame: At baseline

This outcome measure is assessing the participants impression of their quality of life as measured by the QWL scale.

Scores range from 16 ( terrible quality of life ) to 112 (Very delighted). Used as a continuous variable.

At baseline
Quality of Life (QWL)
Time Frame: At 12 weeks

This outcome measure is assessing the participants impression of their quality of life as measured by the QWL scale.

Scores range from 16 ( terrible quality of life ) to 112 (Very delighted). Used as a continuous variable.

At 12 weeks
Disability Rating Scale (DRS)
Time Frame: At baseline

This scale is a measure of impairment, disability and handicap. It is intended to measure accurately general functional changes over the course of recovery and has found to be both valid and reliable.

Scores range from 0 (normal) and 29 (extreme vegetative state).

At baseline
Disability Rating Scale (DRS)
Time Frame: At 12 weeks

This scale is a measure of impairment, disability and handicap. It is intended to measure accurately general functional changes over the course of recovery and has found to be both valid and reliable.

Scores range from 0 (normal) and 29 (extreme vegetative state).

At 12 weeks
Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
Time Frame: At baseline

This outcome measure assess the participants Cognitive status. Scores range from 0 ( significantly impaired) -30 ( normal).

A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.

At baseline
Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE)
Time Frame: At 12 weeks

This outcome measure assess the participants Cognitive status. Scores range from 0 ( significantly impaired) -30 ( normal).

A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. In this study the score was used as a continuous variable.

At 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vani Rao, M.D, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depression

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe