Axillary Reverse Mapping

January 6, 2017 updated by: University of Kansas Medical Center

ARM: Axillary Reverse Mapping

It has been hypothesized that the proximity of the anatomic locations of the arm lymphatic drainage system to the breast lymphatic system in the axilla put the arm lymphatics at risk for disruption during a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Therefore, mapping the drainage of the arm in addition to the drainage of the breast during the procedure would potentially decrease the incidence of arm lymphatic disruption and subsequent development of lymphedema while providing adequate axillary breast nodes needed for staging.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients will receive an injection of 1.0 mCi of technetium-99m sulfur colloid that will be injected into the sub-dermal subareolar aspect of the affected breast.

On the day of surgery, if the radioactive SLN cannot be located using the gamma probe prior to incision, lymphazurin or methylene blue dye will be used in the breast in the subareolar plexus at the discretion of the surgeon for assistance in identifying the sentinel nodes. This contingency, expected to occur < 3% of the time, will be used since locating the SLN for staging is of greater importance than the study. If radioactive isotope is sufficient to identify the sentinel node draining from the breast, then the blue dye will be injected dermally in the upper inner arm along the bicipital groove of the ipsilateral arm in order to locate the draining lymphatics from the arm. No more than 5cc of blue dye will be injected in any of the above mentioned scenarios. The site of all injections (radioactivity and/or blue dye) will be recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

210

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 - 100 years old
  • Not pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Diagnosis of breast cancer requiring LN evaluation for ipsilateral or contralateral breast or prophylactic mastectomy
  • Willing participation after obtaining informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 or > 100 years of age
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Blue dye allergy
  • Cosmetic allergy
  • History of primary lymphedema
  • Prior breast augmentation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Sentinel lymph node biopsy
During surgery, 1.0 mCi of technetium-99m sulfur colloid will be injected into sub-dermal subareolar aspect of the affected breast. The KUMC Nuclear Medicine Department will be responsible for performing the injection of the isotope and dilution of the isotope using saline to a final volume of 4.0 ml or less.
On the day of surgery, if the radioactive SLN cannot be located using the gamma probe prior to incision, lymphazurin or methylene blue dye will be used in the breast in the subareolar plexus at the discretion of the surgeon for assistance in identifying the sentinel nodes. This contingency, expected to occur <3% of the time, will be used since locating the SLN for staging is of greater importance than the study. If radioactive isotope is sufficient to identify the sentinel node draining from the breast, then the blue dye will be injected dermally in the upper inner arm along the bicipital groove of the ipsilateral arm in order to locate the draining lymphatics from the arm. No more than 5cc of blue dye will be injected in any of the above mentioned scenarios.
Other: Axillary lymph node biopsy
The one-year lymphedema rate among subjects undergoing axillary lymph node dissection with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy is ≥ 0.13. With our sample size of 58 subjects undergoing ALND, we will reject that hypothesis in favor of the alternative-that the lymphedema rate is <0.13 for subjects undergoing ALND-if lymphedema is confirmed in three or fewer (ie, 0, 1, 2, or 3) subjects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess lymphedema rates
Time Frame: Four Years
The primary objective of this study is to assess and test the lymphedema rates six times at the following intervals: Pre-surgery - baseline, at 6 months, and yearly for 4 years. Since the historical control rates are different (5% for SLNB only and 13% for ALND with or without SLNB) two tests will be performed.
Four Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of breast sentinal lymph node and arm lymphatics
Time Frame: at time of surgery
Successful identification (localization) of breast sentinel lymph node and arm lymphatics
at time of surgery
Characterization of location
Time Frame: at time of surgery
Characterization of location (typical versus variant) of arm lymphatics
at time of surgery
Protection of the arm
Time Frame: at time of surgery
Successful protection of the arm lymphatics during sentinel lymph node biopsy and/or axillary lymph node dissection
at time of surgery
Occurrence of crossover
Time Frame: at time of surgery
Occurrence of crossover (i.e., co-localization) between hot breast sentinel lymph node and blue arm lymphatics
at time of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jamie Wagner, DO, University of Kansas Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Injection of isotope

Subscribe