- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01387074
Observational Study of Botox® Treatment for Patients With Upper Limb Adult Spasticity
December 13, 2013 updated by: Allergan
A Prospective, Non-interventional, Observational Study of Botox® Treatment for Patients With Upper Limb Adult Spasticity
This is a prospective, non-interventional, observational study to collect data on the use of botulinum toxin Type A in a routine setting in patients with upper limb adult spasticity.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
108
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Schleswig-Holstein
-
Itzehoe, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Adult patients with upper limb spasticity following stroke who are eligible to receive botulinum toxin Type A treatment
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients with upper limb spasticity following a stroke
- Eligible to receive botulinum toxin Type A
- No previous botulinum toxin Type A therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
botulinum toxin Type A
Botulinum toxin Type A treatment at a dose determined by the physician at Baseline followed by a second botulinum toxin Type A treatment approximately 12 weeks later if applicable.
|
Botulinum toxin Type A treatment at a dose determined by the physician at Baseline followed by a second botulinum toxin Type A treatment approximately 12 weeks later if applicable.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the elbow compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension.
A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best).
A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse).
The number of participants in each score category is presented.
|
Baseline
|
|
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Elbow at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
|
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the elbow compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension.
A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best).
A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse).
The number of participants in each score category is presented.
|
Week 24
|
|
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Wrist at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the wrist compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension.
A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best).
A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse).
The number of participants in each score category is presented.
|
Baseline
|
|
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Wrist at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
|
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the wrist compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension.
A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best).
A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse).
The number of participants in each score category is presented.
|
Week 24
|
|
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Fingers at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the fingers compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension.
A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best).
A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse).
The number of participants in each score category is presented.
|
Baseline
|
|
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Fingers at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
|
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the fingers compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension.
A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best).
A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse).
The number of participants in each score category is presented.
|
Week 24
|
|
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Thumb at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the thumb compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension.
A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best).
A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse).
The number of participants in each score category is presented.
|
Baseline
|
|
Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Thumb at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
|
The MAS assessed the degree of muscle tone during movement of the thumb compared to normal muscle tone using a 6-point scale where: 0=no increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the part is moved, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder of the range of motion, 2=Marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion but affected part easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone passive movement difficult or 4=Affected part rigid in movement or extension.
A low score indicated little or no stiffness (best).
A high score indicated severe stiffness (worse).
The number of participants in each score category is presented.
|
Week 24
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 1, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
July 4, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
February 3, 2014
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 13, 2013
Last Verified
December 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Neuromuscular Manifestations
- Muscle Hypertonia
- Muscle Spasticity
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Cholinergic Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors
- Neuromuscular Agents
- Botulinum Toxins
- Botulinum Toxins, Type A
- abobotulinumtoxinA
Other Study ID Numbers
- MAF/AGN/NS/SPA/018
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Muscle Spasticity
-
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildRecruiting
-
Vancouver Island Health AuthorityRecruiting
-
Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Iuliu HatieganuRecruiting
-
Nantes University HospitalCompiègne University of TechnologyCompleted
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkEnrolling by invitation
-
Medy-ToxCompletedSpasticity, Muscle
-
University of MalagaUnknownSpasticity, Muscle
-
Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital...CompletedSpasticity, MuscleTurkey
-
Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-PelasciniSuspended
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabSuspended
Clinical Trials on botulinum toxin Type A
-
AllerganTerminatedOveractive BladderSerbia, Turkey, Greece, Egypt, Lebanon, India
-
Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.Completed
-
AllerganCompletedOveractive BladderPortugal, South Africa, Netherlands, Canada, Singapore, Brazil, United States, Taiwan, Italy, United Kingdom, France, Spain
-
AllerganCompletedOveractive BladderUnited Kingdom, Belgium, New Zealand, France, Russian Federation, Czech Republic, United States, Germany, Austria, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine, Canada, Australia
-
Mentor Worldwide, LLCSynteract, Inc.CompletedGlabellar RhytidesUnited States
-
Brazilan Center for Studies in DermatologyCompletedWrinkles in Frontal AreaBrazil
-
Mentor Worldwide, LLCSynteract, Inc.CompletedGlabellar Rhytides | Frown Lines Between the EyebrowsUnited States
-
HugelCompletedBenign Masseteric HypertrophyKorea, Republic of
-
Medy-ToxCompletedCervical Dystonia
-
INIBIO Co., Ltd.Completed