Reconstruction Plate Compared With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for Midshaft Clavicular Fractures

April 25, 2014 updated by: Fernando B Andrade-Silva, MD, University of Sao Paulo

Reconstruction Plate Compared With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated with plates or intramedullary flexible nails fixation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Midshaft clavicular fractures are classically treated with non-surgical methods, supported by many authors as an effective treatment. However, different researches have shown high rates of nonunion and clavicle malunion related to the nonoperative treatment. Currently, indications for surgical treatment are wider and include mainly the following: shortening greater than or equal to 2.0 cm, multiple trauma, open fractures or with imminent exposure and associated neurovascular injury.

Plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures is widely described in the literature, and is considered the gold standard by different authors, associated with a high union rate and a low complication rate. Different types of plates have been used, including reconstruction plates, dynamic compression plates (DCP), low-contact dynamic compression plates (LC-DCP), semi-tubular plates, and pre-molded locking plates. Possible complications are postoperative infection, hardware loosening or failure, peri-incision paresthesia, neurovascular iatrogenic lesions, nonunion, and hardware related symptoms.

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) technique has been used in recent years in the treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures. Different studies report excellent functional results and low complication rates. Some theoretical advantages in relation to plates are the 3-point flexible nail support, which provides superior biomechanics resistance and uses the relative stability principle, favoring callus formation. When compared to plain steel wires, titanium nails have lower migration risk, due to its greater flexibility and better bone fixation.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated with reconstruction plates or ESIN.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05403-010
        • University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Displaced Fractures of the middle third of the clavicle (no contact between the main fragments)
  2. Age between 16 and 65 year old;
  3. Terms of consent signed by the patient or guardian.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Fracture of medial or lateral third of the clavicle;
  2. Cortical contact between the main fracture fragments;
  3. Age below 16 years old or more than 65 years old;
  4. Pathological fracture;
  5. Ipsilateral previous injuries of the shoulder or upper limb;
  6. Ipsilateral associated fractures of the shoulder or upper limb;
  7. Neuro-vascular injury associated;
  8. Open fracture not eligible for primary internal fixation;
  9. Clinical contraindication for surgery;
  10. Fracture older than 30 days;
  11. Patient not cooperative or ineligible for the follow-up;
  12. Lack of consent to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Plate fixation
Reconstruction plate
Reconstruction plate
Active Comparator: ESIN
ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)
ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DASH score
Time Frame: 6 months
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (0: best function; 100: worst function)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DASH score
Time Frame: 12 months
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (0: best function; 100: worst function)
12 months
Constant-Murley Score
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months PO
Shoulder functional score (0: worst function; 100: best function)
6 and 12 months PO
Time to Union
Time Frame: Monthly
Time necessary to reach complete union measured in weeks
Monthly
Radiographic residual shortening
Time Frame: 6 months
Clavicles shortening compared to the contralateral side
6 months
Patient satisfaction with the treatment
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Subjective measurement. Patients are questioned about their satisfaction with the treatment instituted. Binary outcome.
6 and 12 months
Complication rate
Time Frame: Monthly

Complications were divided in Minor and Major, as follows:

Minor: paresthesia, transient neurologic deficit, implant deformation, partial implant migration, acromioclavicular or sternoclavicular pain, hardware related pain

Major: permanent neurologic deficit, total implant failure, total implant migration, refracture, reoperation, nonunion

Monthly

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fernando B Andrade-Silva, MD, University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 28, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IOT-HCFMUSP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clavicle Fracture

Clinical Trials on Plate fixation

Subscribe