- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01410032
Reconstruction Plate Compared With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for Midshaft Clavicular Fractures
Reconstruction Plate Compared With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Midshaft clavicular fractures are classically treated with non-surgical methods, supported by many authors as an effective treatment. However, different researches have shown high rates of nonunion and clavicle malunion related to the nonoperative treatment. Currently, indications for surgical treatment are wider and include mainly the following: shortening greater than or equal to 2.0 cm, multiple trauma, open fractures or with imminent exposure and associated neurovascular injury.
Plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures is widely described in the literature, and is considered the gold standard by different authors, associated with a high union rate and a low complication rate. Different types of plates have been used, including reconstruction plates, dynamic compression plates (DCP), low-contact dynamic compression plates (LC-DCP), semi-tubular plates, and pre-molded locking plates. Possible complications are postoperative infection, hardware loosening or failure, peri-incision paresthesia, neurovascular iatrogenic lesions, nonunion, and hardware related symptoms.
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) technique has been used in recent years in the treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures. Different studies report excellent functional results and low complication rates. Some theoretical advantages in relation to plates are the 3-point flexible nail support, which provides superior biomechanics resistance and uses the relative stability principle, favoring callus formation. When compared to plain steel wires, titanium nails have lower migration risk, due to its greater flexibility and better bone fixation.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated with reconstruction plates or ESIN.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05403-010
- University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Displaced Fractures of the middle third of the clavicle (no contact between the main fragments)
- Age between 16 and 65 year old;
- Terms of consent signed by the patient or guardian.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Fracture of medial or lateral third of the clavicle;
- Cortical contact between the main fracture fragments;
- Age below 16 years old or more than 65 years old;
- Pathological fracture;
- Ipsilateral previous injuries of the shoulder or upper limb;
- Ipsilateral associated fractures of the shoulder or upper limb;
- Neuro-vascular injury associated;
- Open fracture not eligible for primary internal fixation;
- Clinical contraindication for surgery;
- Fracture older than 30 days;
- Patient not cooperative or ineligible for the follow-up;
- Lack of consent to participate.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Plate fixation
Reconstruction plate
|
Reconstruction plate
|
|
Active Comparator: ESIN
ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)
|
ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
DASH score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (0: best function; 100: worst function)
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
DASH score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (0: best function; 100: worst function)
|
12 months
|
|
Constant-Murley Score
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months PO
|
Shoulder functional score (0: worst function; 100: best function)
|
6 and 12 months PO
|
|
Time to Union
Time Frame: Monthly
|
Time necessary to reach complete union measured in weeks
|
Monthly
|
|
Radiographic residual shortening
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Clavicles shortening compared to the contralateral side
|
6 months
|
|
Patient satisfaction with the treatment
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
|
Subjective measurement.
Patients are questioned about their satisfaction with the treatment instituted.
Binary outcome.
|
6 and 12 months
|
|
Complication rate
Time Frame: Monthly
|
Complications were divided in Minor and Major, as follows: Minor: paresthesia, transient neurologic deficit, implant deformation, partial implant migration, acromioclavicular or sternoclavicular pain, hardware related pain Major: permanent neurologic deficit, total implant failure, total implant migration, refracture, reoperation, nonunion |
Monthly
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Fernando B Andrade-Silva, MD, University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IOT-HCFMUSP
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Clavicle Fracture
-
Medipol UniversityWithdrawnClavicle Fracture | Clavicle InjuryTurkey
-
Zimmer BiometActive, not recruiting
-
Medipol UniversityWithdrawn
-
Al-Azhar UniversityRecruitingClavicle Fracture | Clavicle InjuryEgypt
-
University Hospital, BrestActive, not recruitingClavicle Fracture | Pseudarthrosis | Clavicle Fracture, Non Union/MalunionFrance
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...CompletedMalunion of Fracture of Clavicle | Delayed Union of Fracture of ClavicleCanada
-
Naval Medical Center Camp LejeuneEnrolling by invitationClavicle Fracture | Acromioclavicular Joint | Clavicle Surgery | Coracoclavicular LigamentUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityCompletedClavicle Fracture | Clavicle InjuryTurkey
-
Prince of Songkla UniversityRecruiting
-
Bichat HospitalNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Plate fixation
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...The First People's Hospital of Huzhou; Taizhou Hospital; Ningbo No.2 HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School...UnknownTreatment | Postieror Malleolar Fracture
-
Université de MontréalCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke; Hopital...CompletedClosed Fracture Proximal Humerus, NeckCanada
-
Rasmus ElsøeAarhus University Hospital; Viborg Regional Hospital; Randers Regional Hospital; Regional Hospital Hjoerring and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgery | Orthopedic Disorder | Patella FractureDenmark
-
University of WarwickDePuy International; University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustUnknown
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterCompleted
-
UMAE Hospital de Traumatologia y Ortopedia de PueblaCompletedClosed Fracture of Shaft of Clavicle
-
Kepler University HospitalRecruiting
-
Peking University People's HospitalUnknown
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedDorsally Displaced Intraarticular Distal Radius Fractures | Age 50 - 74 for Females or 60-74 for Males | Low Energy TraumaSweden