A Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment With Enbrel in Adult Patient in Outpatient Department (ENBREL NIS CN)

January 23, 2014 updated by: Pfizer

A Non-Interventional Study of the Treatment With Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Subjects in Rheumatology Department

This is an open-label, multicenter and observational study in China, which is designed to record the data of RA & AS patients within 52 weeks after rheumatologists decided to prescribe etanercept, and evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatment. All eligible subjects agreed to be recruited in the study and can withdraw anytime if they choose so.

Patients with RA or AS are typically managed by rheumatologists. As this study seeks to record the data of RA & AS patient in etanercept and evaluate the safety and efficacy of the treatment, patients will be recruited from Rheumatic department. Rheumatologist will be asked to build up the database for RA & AS patient surveillance prospectively in outpatient dept, which benefits for the patient treatment outcomes evaluation and clinical management.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this non-interventional study is to evaluate the safety of etanercept in Chinese RA and AS subjects. Total of 600 subjects (300 RA subjects and 300 AS subjects) will be enrolled in the study. If the true rate of an adverse event is no less than 0.5%, with sample size of 600 subjects, this study will have 95% probability to detect at least one occurrence of the adverse event. The study prematurely discontinued on January 15, 2013 due to slow enrollment and low adherence of etanercept. It should be noted that safety concerns have not been seen in this study and have not factored into this decision.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Baotou city, China
        • Baotou Central Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 200052
        • Shanghai Changning Guanghua Integrative Medicine Hospital
      • Shanghai, China, 201900
        • Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Third People's Hospital
      • Urumqi, China, 830001
        • Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital
    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400038
        • Daping Hospital
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350001
        • Fujian Provincial Hospital
    • Gansu
      • Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 730030
        • Lanzhou University Second Hospital
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510405
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
    • Heilongjiang
      • Haerbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150001
        • No. 199
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410011
        • The second Xiangya hospital of central south university
    • Inner Mongolia
      • Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China, 014010
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210029
        • Jiangsu Province Hospital/Department of Rheumatology
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, China, 226001
        • Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
    • Shanxi
      • Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 030001
        • The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • Si Chuan Huaxi Hospital/Rheumatology Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

outpatient RA and AS patients in China

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis.
  • Subject has accepted physician's prescription of etanercept in rheumatology department.
  • Subject agreed to be enrolled in the observational study and sign the ICD.
  • Subject is≥18 years of age at the time of consent.
  • Subject is willing and able to understand and complete questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of active or suspected latent infection including HIV, or any underlying disease, including open cutaneous ulcers that could predispose the subject to infections.
  • Immunodeficiency syndromes including Felty syndrome or large granular lymphocyte syndrome.
  • Active tuberculosis (TB) or a history of TB, or findings consistent with previous exposure to TB on a chest x-ray (CXR). Investigators must follow China's guidelines for appropriate screening and treatment of TB.
  • History of hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients in either preparation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
RA, AS
Rheumatoid arthritis patients Ankylosing spondylitis patients
25mg biweekly or 50mg per week, subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
  • etanercept

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Had Any Adverse Events (AEs) During 24 Weeks
Time Frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks
Number of Participants Who Had Any AEs During 52 Weeks
Time Frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks
Number of Participants Who Had Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 24 weeks
An SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 24 weeks
Number of Participants Who Had Any SAEs During 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 52 weeks
An SAE was defined as an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Informed consent or signed data privacy statement through 52 weeks
Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 24 Weeks
Time Frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category.
First day of receiving etanercept through 24 weeks
Number of Participants With AEs Per System Organ Class During 52 Weeks
Time Frame: First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Participants with multiple AEs within a category (system organ class) were counted once within the category.
First day of receiving etanercept through 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Physicians indicated on a 0-100 millimeters (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess the activity of the participant's disease according to the participant's clinical condition, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active).
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Participant's Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Participants placed a vertical line on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of their global disease activity, with 0 meaning no disease activity (disease inactive) and 100 meaning extreme disease activity (disease extremely active).
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
VAS Score for Pain
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Participants placed a mark on a 0-100 mm VAS to indicate the magnitude of pain, with 0 meaning no pain and 100 meaning the most severe pain.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment Adherence Rate of 1), <50 Percents (%), 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%
Time Frame: First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52
Treatment adherence rate was calculated using the following formula: [Actual dosing/expected dosing on the basis of approved product label] × 100%. Counts of participants by 6 levels of treatment adherence rate: 1), <50%, 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120%.
First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52
Evaluate the Association Between Participant's Age and Treatment Adherence Rate
Time Frame: First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52
Participants were allocated to 5 groups by age as 10 years separately: <20 years, >=20 and <30 years, >=30 and <40 years, >=40 and <50 years, >50 years. The number of participants with treatment adherence rate 1), <50%, 2), >=50% and <70%, 3), >=70% and <80%, 4), >=80% and <100%, 5), >=100% and <120%, and 6), >=120% were provided for each age group described above.
First day of receiving etanercept up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 52
Number of participants with any abnormal laboratory test results, criteria for abnormalities were complete blood count (CBC) including hemoglobin (<0.8*lower limit of normal[LLN]), mean corpuscular volume (MCV, <0.9*LLN or >1.1*upper limit of normal[ULN]), hematocrit (<0.8*LLN), red blood cell count (<0.8*LLN), platelets (<0.5*LLN or >1.75*ULN), white blood cell count (<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN), lymphocytes (<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN), neutrophils (<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN), basophil (>1.2*ULN), eosinophil (>1.2*ULN), and monocytes (>1.2*ULN); ESR (>1.5*ULN); aspartate aminotransferase (AST,>3.0*ULN); alanine aminotransferase (ALT,>3.0*ULN); blood urea nitrogen (BUN,>1.3*ULN); and creatinine (CRE,>1.3*ULN).
Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 52
Tender Joint Count (TJC) for RA Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
TJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and the knees. The joints were assessed for tenderness using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Swollen Joint Count (SJC) for RA Participants
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
SJC (28 joints) include the joints of shoulders, elbows, wrists, MCP, PIP, and the knees. The joints were assessed for swelling using the following scale: Present (1), Absent (2), Not Done (3), Not Applicable (4). Artificial joints were not assessed.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36, Week 52
Disease Activity Score (DAS) Based on 28-joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 52
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity on a 0-100 mm VAS: DAS28-4 (ESR)=0.56*square root(TJC 28 joints) + 0.28*square root(SJC 28 joints) + 0.70*ln(ESR) + 0.014*PtGA. DAS28-4 (ESR) above 5.1 indicated high disease activity whereas a DAS28-4 (ESR) below 3.2 indicated low disease activity.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 52
Number of RA Participants Had DAS28-4 (ESR) Improvement
Time Frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52
Counts of participants had good, moderate and no response to treatment with etanercept. Good response was present DAS28-4 (ESR) <=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline >1.2. Moderate response was 1) present DAS28-4 (ESR) >3.2 and <=5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline >1.2, or >0.6 and <=1.2; 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) <=3.2, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2; or 3) present DAS28-4 (ESR) >5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline > 1.2. No response was 1) DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline <=0.6 regardless present DAS28-4 (ESR), or 2) present DAS28-4 (ESR) >5.1, DAS28-4 (ESR) improvement from baseline >0.6 and <=1.2.
Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52
Number of RA Participants Had Remission of Disease
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52
Counts of participants had remission of disease. Remission of disease was defined by a DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 36, Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Enbrel

Subscribe