Appropriate Complmentary Feeding Strategies in Infants (CFS)

August 8, 2011 updated by: Aga Khan University

Appropriate Complementary Feeding Strategies in Infants: An Evaluation of Various Strategies to Assess the Growth and Health of the Infants.

The purpose of this study has been to understand the prevalence of under nutrition and develop effective interventions for improving growth and micronutrient status of infants receiving complementary foods.

In this community based randomized clinical trial, the nutrition education package implemented aimed to improve hematological parameters including the micronutrient status and to see effect on growth indicators.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Transition from exclusive breast feeding to complementary feeding poses many challenges as the demand for nutrients necessary for optimum growth and development increases steadily. Malnutrition and micronutrient malnutrition can be inter-generational and affect pregnant mothers and consequently the baby may be born with deficient micronutrient stores, especially those of iron. This deficiency can be further exacerbated by sub-optimal practices of breast feeding. Globally, iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia estimated to affect nearly 2 billion people especially preschool children. In Pakistan, 56 % of children under the age of five years are estimated to have iron deficiency anemia and 13 % are also severely malnourished. These deficiencies affect not only physical growth but also mental development with significant impact on immunity and increased burden of infections. It is uncertain what the most appropriate intervention strategy is and a wide range of options are mentioned including dietary diversification through nutrition education, provision of fortified foods, iron supplementation and home-based fortification of complementary foods with micronutrient powders such as Sprinkles.

In an effort to understand the prevalence of under nutrition and develop effective interventions for improving growth and micronutrient status of infants receiving complementary foods, I undertook a prospective community-based randomized controlled efficacy trial in a representative urban population of Karachi. Infants and mothers were identified after birth and enrolled in the study to receive one of the interventions through community health workers at the age of six months. The enrolled infants were placed in three groups - defined as Nutr Education (Nutr Edu), Oral iron supplementation (OIS) and Multiple micronutrient fortification (MMF). Nutrition education component was common to all the groups. Through nutritional education sessions held in the community, dietary diversification along with continuation of breast feeding was stressed to enhance the intake of diet, rich in iron, and other micronutrients. A cohort of 451 infants (177 in group Nutr Edu, 141 in group OIS and 133 in MMF) were followed for three months (till the end of treatments) for growth, micronutrient status, and morbidity rate and thereafter followed for another three months to evaluate anthropometric parameters.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

470

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 74800
        • Bilal Colony Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 8 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All children between the age of 6 months to 8 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who are sick to an extent that cannot take anythign oral were excluded from this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Nutrition Education plus Multiple Micronutrient Fortification
In this group along with the nutritional education, multiple micronutrient fortification was given in the form of Sprinkles
Active Comparator: OIS plus Nutritional Eductaion
In this group, along with the nutritional education, Oral Iron Supplementation was given.
Active Comparator: Nutrition Education Group
This is group was followed for the growth of the child and was given Nutritional Education to children's mothers.
to assess the change in behaviour

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anemia
Time Frame: 12 months
To assess the impact of supplementation and multiple micronutrient fortification in comparison to nutritional education strategy to assess the biochecmical and growth indicators
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance to intake of study medicines
Time Frame: 12 months
Compliance was checked to ensure that subjects are taking study medicines properly.
12 months
Morbidity Assessment
Time Frame: 12 months
Subjects were assessed on fortnighty basis to see any change in the morbidity.
12 months
Developmental Assessment
Time Frame: 12 months
Subjects were assessed on monthly developmental milestones among the three groups.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aziz AJ Abdul Rehman Jiwani, MBBS, PhD, The Aga Khan University
  • Study Chair: Zulfiqar ZB Bhuta, MBBS, MCPS (Peds), FCPS (Peds), The Aga Khan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 9, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia

Clinical Trials on Multiple micronutrient fortification plus Nutrition Education

Subscribe