Abrogation of Mitral Regurgitation Using the MitraClip System in High-Risk Patients Unsuitable for Surgery (ISAR-CLIP)

September 8, 2011 updated by: Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Interventional Strategy to Abrogate Mitral Regurgitation Using the MitraClip System in High-Risk Patients Considered Unsuitable for Surgery (ISAR-CLIP)

The primary objective in this randomized trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a MitraClip treatment in symptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation in comparison to the previous default medical treatment - in a study population who is not amenable for the conventional surgical approach as current gold standard.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The presence of a significant mitral regurgitation (MR) seriously effects the patient's quality of life and is associated with an increased mortality rate. The operative treatment of MR - either mitral valve repair or replacement - is the current gold standard. However mere half of the patients with a severe and symptomatic MR actually undergo an operative treatment (EURO-HEART-SURVEY) due to restricted left ventricular ejection fraction, elderly patients with co-morbidities and high perioperative morbidity and mortality. In contrast, patients with severe and symptomatic MR not suitable for operation are treated with palliative medical therapy (heart insufficiency therapy). With the development of the MitraClip device - a minimal-invasive, percutaneous catheter-based technique - high-risk patients not suitable for surgery may receive a promising alternative treatment by approximating the mitral leaflets, thus creating a permanent leaflet coaptation and reducing or even abrogating the MR. The current data support the assumption of a safe and effective MR reduction with the MitraClip-System in inoperable high-risk patients with severe MR. But the feasibility still has to be proven in this special patient population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Bavaria
      • Munich, Bavaria, Germany, 80636
        • Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 18 years
  • signed written consent
  • symptomatic patients (NYHA-stadium ≥ III) for at least 3 months with an exploited medical heart insufficiency therapy
  • increased perioperative risk with a logistic EuroScore ≥ 15 or STS-Score ≥ 15
  • MR grade ≥ 2, amenable for MitraClip intervention assessed by an experienced interventional cardiologist
  • Affirmation of in-operability by a "Heart-Team" consisting of either 1 cardiac surgeon and 1 cardiologist or 3 cardiologists

Exclusion Criteria:

  • one essential cardiovascular event in the past 6 weeks; i. e. myocardial infarction, stroke, shock, cardiac decompensation, or the necessity of catecholamine therapy for haemodynamic stabilisation
  • implantation of a biventricular pacemaker-device for cardiac resynchronisation therapy in the past 3 months
  • solid tumor with a live expectancy < 1 year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: percutaneous treatment
With a minimal-invasive, percutaneous catheter-based technique and trans-septal approach under transesophageal echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance, the MitraClip device grasps and approximates the mitral leaflets thus creating a double-orifice mitral valve with a permanent leaflet coaptation and a reduction or even abrogation of mitral regurgitation.
Other Names:
  • Mitra Clip system
NO_INTERVENTION: optimal medical treatment
With a minimal-invasive, percutaneous catheter-based technique and trans-septal approach under transesophageal echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance, the MitraClip device grasps and approximates the mitral leaflets thus creating a double-orifice mitral valve with a permanent leaflet coaptation and a reduction or even abrogation of mitral regurgitation.
Other Names:
  • Mitra Clip system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement of Dyspnoea of at least one class (NYHA-Classification)
Time Frame: after 6 months
after 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
composite endpoint and clinical outcome measured by NYHA-classification
Time Frame: 1 year and 2 years after intervention
  • composite endpoint (death of any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis, TIMI major bleeding, clip embolisation, partial clip detachement, acute renal failure)
  • unscheduled hospitalization due to increased heart insuffiecency
  • changes in quality of life
  • echocardiographic parameters
  • loboratory parameters
  • resiliance measured by spiroergometry
1 year and 2 years after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Joerg Hausleiter, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
  • Principal Investigator: Steffen Massberg, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
  • Principal Investigator: Juergen Pache, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
  • Principal Investigator: Hasema Lesevic, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 9, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on percutaneous treatment by implanting a Mitra Clip device

3
Subscribe