Development of a Structured Education Programme for Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (SUCCESS)

January 29, 2020 updated by: University of Leicester

StructUred eduCation Programme to Improve Cardiovascular Risk in womEn With polycyStic Ovary Syndrome; SUCCESS Study

Polycystic Ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common hormonal imbalance affecting about 12% of women in the UK. The number of women with PCOS is rising. They suffer from a combination of symptoms including excess hair, irregular/absent periods, and infertility. About 70% of women with PCOS are obese or overweight, 10% develop type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and 30-40% have some degrees of abnormality in controlling (metabolising) blood sugar. Studies have shown that if women with PCOS make change to their lifestyle (diet and activity), they may reduce their risk of getting diabetes and heart disease in the future. This study aims to develop and test a programme that can be run in groups (structured education), to support women with PCOS make the lifestyle changes needed to improve their PCOS and prevent future associated health problems. Structured education programmes are suitable for use within the NHS and are already recommended for individuals with T2DM, but have not been tested as a method of treatment for PCOS which is a high risk condition for T2DM.

The investigators aim to initially develop a specific education programme for women with PCOS using their expertise in their disease and defining their needs. The next step is to test this programme on 160 women with PCOS who will be selected from the investigators database or clinics. They will be divided randomly to two groups to receive either this programme or routine care.

The investigators will give them an accelerometer (a very small portable device). This will measure their physical activity and counts their daily steps. The investigators aim is to increase their step count by at least 2000 steps per day after one year.

The investigators believe that the group given the structured education will show some evidence of improvement in their glucose metabolism, and consequently decreased chance of developing diabetes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Overview of project plan:

Development of the structured education course: Year 1 (Phases 1&2)

Phase 1:

The SUCCESS intervention (structured education programme to improve cardiovascular risk in women with PCOS) will be developed and piloted in line with the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions. This will involve recruiting participants for focus groups and interviews to allow the research group to develop a detailed understanding of what the requirements of the structured education course are.

Inclusion criteria for patients in this phase is women with a clear diagnosis of PCOS based on Rotterdam 2003 Criteria or National Institute of Health 1992 And 18< age <70 years Participants will be recruited from a database of patients in our speciality clinic and also primary care if needed and the interviews/ focus groups will be held in locations close to the participant, or over the telephone.

Analysis of these sessions will provide invaluable data for the development of the structured education course.

As part of this phase of the study we will perform a systematic review of the literature on the previous lifestyle interventions in the PCOS.

We will also perform a demographic analysis of almost 2400 patients with diagnosis of PCOS in University Hospitals of Leicester database. We already have the ethical approval for the conducting routine database linkage studies including a linkage with the hospital admission database in local Health Informatics Service. Demographic distribution of diagnosis, complications of PCOS, cardiovascular outcomes, and reported comorbidities besides other information such as deprivation score will inform us of the important issues need to be considered in development of an education intervention for women with PCOS in phase 2 and 3.

Phase 2

Once the course has been designed, it will be piloted in one or two groups of women with PCOS to get feedback on the content and delivery. These feedbacks will be incorporated in the course and contents will be refreshed and refined.

For the above mentioned pilot sessions, patients will only attend a 3.5 hours education session and no test or measurement will be done.

After each session their views on the content and delivery of the education will be sought. We will continue to run these pilot sessions until we get no further new comments. Previous experience with other similar interventions has shown that two pilot sessions are enough.

When the education programme is ready we can test its efficacy in a randomised controlled trial.

Phase 3; Randomised controlled trial: Years 2 & 3

The primary hypothesis of the randomised controlled trial is:

"Structured education can increase physical activity measured as walking steps in women with polycystic ovary syndrome."

Study design:

This is a randomised controlled community based trial. Participants will be randomised to either the intervention or control group at the beginning. A controlled design for the current study is essential given that it is unknown whether structured education is effective at initiating a lifestyle change and whether it translates into improvements in important markers of metabolic and vascular health. Therefore in order to inform health policy evidence is needed from high quality randomized controlled trials carried out in a community setting.

Our study intervention will not interfere with the routine care of a woman diagnosed with PCOS, whether the patient is recruited from speciality clinics or in primary care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

162

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Leicestershire
      • Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom, LE1 5WW
        • University Hospitals of Licester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females aged between 18-50 years with the diagnosis of PCOS according to Rotterdam Criteria 2003 who are Overweight: (WHO 2010)

    • Body Mass Index ≥ 23 kg/m2 for Black and Minor Ethnicities
    • Body Mass Index ≥ 25 kg/m2 for White Europeans
  • If already on medical treatment for their PCOS, they should be on a stable regime for at least 6 months prior to the recruitment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physical condition which limits full participation in the study
  • Active psychotic illness or a significant illness which, in the view of the investigators, would prevent full participation
  • Inability to communicate in verbal and written English
  • Steroid use
  • Diabetes
  • Pregnancy
  • Involvement in other research studies with similar nature

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention
Lifestyle education intervention
A 3-4 hours group education delivered in a patient group composed of 4-8 patients and delivered by two healthcare professionals.
No Intervention: Control
The control group will receive an information leaflet which is generally distributed in our speciality clinic to patients with diagnosis of PCOS. The leaflet includes general information on PCOS, treatment options and advice on increasing physical activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
we aim for a 2000 steps increase in Number of steps per day
Time Frame: One year
It has been shown that 1 mmol/L drop in 2 hours glucose tolerance test following lifestyle intervention is significantly effective in diabetes prevention equal to 50% reduction in progression to T2DM. A previous similar intervention in people with IGR by our group in Leicester achieved a significant drop of 1.31 mmol/L (SD 2 mmol/L) in 2 hours glucose tolerance through an increase of 2000 steps per day in walking activity (SD 4000 steps/day).
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Activity
Time Frame: One year
Physical activity will be objectively measured using the accelerometer and also IPAQ.
One year
Biochemical variables
Time Frame: One year
  • Oral glucose tolerance test
  • Blood lipid profile, liver and Kidney function test, albumin, vitamin D, calcium and full blood count.
  • Hormonal assay; Follicular Stimulating Hormone (FSH), Luteinizing Hormone (LH), Testosterone, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Dehydroepiandostrone (DHEAS), and Androstendione. Day 21 Progesterone level (unless on ovulation suppression medication).
  • Insulin, HbA1c, HOMA-B, HOMA-IR
  • hsCRP, TNF alpha, IL-6, and sIL-6R, fibrinogen, adiponectin
One year
Anthropometric and demographic
Time Frame: One year
  • Blood pressure
  • Body weight
  • Body fat percentage
One year
Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: One Year
PCOSQ is the only specified health related quality of life questionnaire developed and tested for this condition (Cronin 1998), which has been validated in UK (Jones 2004). It contains 26 items measuring 5 areas; emotions, body hair, weight, infertility problems, and menstrual problems.
One Year
Exercise and Barrier Self Efficacy
Time Frame: One Year
It will be measured using the 100% confidence rating scale (from 0% = no confidence to 100% = complete confidence) (Keller 1999). This self-efficacy questionnaire measures participants' confidence in their ability to undertake any form of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity for 10 minute periods, increasing incrementally from 10 minutes to one hour each day. An overall score is calculated by summing the efficacy scores for each time period and dividing by the number of time periods.
One Year
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: One Year
The risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) has been reported to be 5 to even 30 fold higher in women with PCOS (Nitsche 2010). Epworth Sleepiness Scale is the standard questionnaire developed for clinical assessment of behavioural morbidity associated with OSA and can assess the degree of sleepiness reliably as an screening tool. (Doghramii 2008).
One Year
Body Fat Composition
Time Frame: One Year
In a sub-study of the SUCCESS study population, a whole body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan and a single section abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan taken in the L3-L4 region will be used to measure soft tissue body composition and visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat distribution respectively.
One Year
Brief Illness Perception
Time Frame: One Year
This nine item validated instrument uses an 11 point Likert scale (0 = no effect, 10 = complete effect) to measure five cognitive illness representations (consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, and identity), two emotional representations (concern and emotion) and illness comprehensibility (perceived knowledge). The BIPQ has been shown to have reasonable test-retest reliability and concurrent validity (Broadbent 2006).
One Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melanie J Davies, Prof (MD), University of Leicester
  • Study Chair: Kamlesh Khunti, Prof (PhD), University of Leicester
  • Study Director: Hamidreza Mani, MD, University of Leicester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Structured Lifestyle Education

Subscribe