The Impact of Psychological Interventions on Psychometric and Immunological Measures in Patients With Major Depression

June 9, 2016 updated by: Winfried Rief, Philipps University Marburg Medical Center

The Impact of Psychological Interventions (With and Without Exercise) on Psychometric and Immunological Measures in Patients With Major Depression

The objective of this study is to compare the impact of i) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) combined with exercise, ii)CBT combined with euthymic therapy, and iii) 'Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy' (CBASP) on psychometric and immunological measures in patients with major depression.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The interest of the investigation is to compare the impact of CBT combined with exercise, CBT combined with euthymic therapy and CBASP on depression and further psychopathological variables (assessed at 5 points).

Previous findings indicate increased concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines in depression. A bidirectional relationship between depression and immunological alterations has been suggested: On the one hand pro-inflammatory cytokines may contribute to depression, on the other hand depression-linked changes (e.g. a reduction of activity, increased stress-sensitivity) may lead to increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Therefore, this study is also supposed to investigate the influence of above mentioned interventions on pro-inflammatory cytokines. Using a waiting group, potential changes in psychometric and biological parameters without any intervention are controlled. Assessments take place at baseline, after 4 weeks of treatment, after 8 weeks of treatment, after 16 weeks of treatment and 6 months follow up.

200 patients with Major Depression (DSM IV, BDI II at baseline ≥18) will be included. Patients will be randomized and assigned to one of the 4 groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marburg, Germany, 35032
        • Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University Marburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with Major Depression (DSM IV), BDI >=18
  • age:18-65 years
  • patients with and without antidepressive medication
  • comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders is permitted, as far as depressive symptoms are dominating

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current psychotherapy
  • psychotic disorder
  • serious drug-addiction
  • drugs which seriously affect immune status (except contraceptives) or central nervous system functions (except antidepressants)
  • infections during the last 2 weeks
  • injuries during the last 2 weeks
  • neurological disorders
  • diseases which affect immune status or central nervous system functions (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, CVD,etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CBT-active
Patients with Major Depression (N = 50) get a common CBT treatment in combination with physical exercise.
Patients get CBT treatment combined with moderate physical exercise (4x40min/week for 4 weeks, week 5, 6, 7 and 8).
Active Comparator: CBT-euthymic
Patients with Major Depression (N = 50) get the same common CBT treatment as the CBT-active-group, but instead of physical exercise they receive an enjoyment training, which is based on exercises from the "Kleine Schule des Genießens" (Koppenhöfer, 2004)
Patients get the same common CBT treatment as group I, but instead of physical exercise they receive an enjoyment training Patients get CBT treatment combined with euthymic exercise (4x40min/week for 4 weeks, week 5, 6, 7 and 8).
Active Comparator: CBASP
Patients with Major Depression (N=50) get a cognitive therapy according to the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP).

Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy integrates behavioral, cognitive, psychodynamic and interpersonal strategies.

Foci of the CBASP-therapy are situation analysis and subsequent behavioral trainings as well as interpersonal strategies to create a therapeutic relationship.

No Intervention: Waiting List
Patients randomized to the waiting list receive psychological treatment after waiting for 4 month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in severity of depressive symptoms from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Time Frame: From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Becks Depression Inventory II (BDI-II; german adaptation by Hautzinger, Kühner & Keller, 2006)
From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in immunological measures from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Time Frame: From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
C-reactive protein, inflammatory markers(Il-6, TNF-alpha, INF-gamma, IL-1ra, sTNF-RI, sTNF-RII) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (Il-10)
From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Changes in psychopathological variables from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Time Frame: From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Symptom-Checklist by Derogatis (SCL-90-R; german adaption by Franke, 1995)
From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Changes in perceived stress from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Time Frame: From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Trier inventary for chronic stress (TICS-K; Trierer Inventar zu chronischen Stress; Schulz et al., 2004)
From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Changes in self-rated physical activity from baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Time Frame: From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Internationational Physical Activity Questionaire (IPAQ, Granger et al., 2000)
From baseline (beginning of therapy) to 4 weeks after baseline, to 8 weeks after baseline, to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy) to 6-month-follow up
Changes from baseline to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy)
Time Frame: From baseline to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy)
Verbal test for learning- and memory abilities (Verbaler Lern- und Merkfähigkeitstest-VLMT; Helmstaedter, Lendt, Lux, 2001)
From baseline to 16 weeks after baseline (end of therapy)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Winfried Rief, Prof., Philipps University Marburg Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 3, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on CBT - active

Subscribe