- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01464931
Multiple Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety of Multiple Doses of Denosumab 120 mg in Adults With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and CKD on Dialysis
January 22, 2016 updated by: Amgen
An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety of Multiple Doses of Denosumab 120 mg Administered Subcutaneously in Subjects With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and CKD on Dialysis
The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of clinically significant hypocalcemia following multiple 120 mg subcutaneous doses of denosumab in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and CKD on dialysis
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
32
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Tempe, Arizona, United States, 85284
- Research Site
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80230
- Research Site
-
-
Florida
-
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33028
- Research Site
-
-
Idaho
-
Meridian, Idaho, United States, 83642
- Research Site
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48236
- Research Site
-
-
South Carolina
-
Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States, 29118
- Research Site
-
-
Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78215
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects at least 18 years old with severe CKD (defined as creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min at both screening assessments) and CKD requiring hemodialysis
- Additional inclusion criteria apply
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects must have calcium, phosphate, and magnesium levels appropriate for their condition and must not have other uncontrolled co-morbidities.
- Additional exclusion criteria apply
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Denosumab
Participants received two 120 mg doses of denosumab administered subcutaneously on Day 1 and Day 29.
|
Adminstered by subcutaneous injection
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Hypocalcemia
Time Frame: 113 days
|
Clinically significant hypocalcemia is defined as albumin-adjusted calcium < 7.0 mg/dL or symptomatic hypocalcemia.
Symptomatic hypocalcemiais is defined as both a clinical adverse event of hypocalcemia and a concomitant symptom of hypocalcemia (e.g., hypoesthesia, paresthesia, muscle cramps, seizure, prolonged QT interval) that occurred along with the hypocalcemia event or decreased serum calcium levels.
|
113 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Hypocalcemia Determined by CTCAE v.4.0 Criteria
Time Frame: 113 days
|
The severity of hypocalcemia (a low concentration of calcium, corrected for albumin, in the blood) was graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v.4.0 criteria: Grade 1: albumin-adjusted serum calcium < lower limit of normal (LLN; 9.2 mg/dL) to 8.0 mg/dL; Grade 2: albumin-adjusted serum calcium < 8.0 to 7.0 mg/dL; Grade 3: albumin-adjusted serum calcium < 7.0 to 6.0 mg/dL; Grade 4: albumin-adjusted serum calcium < 6.0 mg/dL.
|
113 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Hypophosphatemia Determined by CTCAE v.4.0 Criteria
Time Frame: 113 days
|
The severity of hypophosphatemia (a low concentration of phosphates in the blood) was graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v.4.0 criteria: Grade 1: < LLN (3 mg/dL) - 2.5 mg/dL; Grade 2: < 2.5 - 2.0 mg/dL; Grade 3: < 2.0 - 1.0 mg/dL; Grade 4: < 1.0 mg/dL.
|
113 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Hypomagnesemia Determined by CTCAE v.4.0 Criteria
Time Frame: 113 days
|
The severity of hypomagnesemia (a low concentration of magnesium in the blood) was graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v.4.0 criteria: Grade 1: < LLN (1.5 mg/dL) - 1.2 mg/dL; Grade 2: < 1.2 - 0.9 mg/dL; Grade 3: < 0.9 - 0.7 mg/dL; Grade 4: < 0.7 mg/dL.
|
113 days
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Albumin-adjusted Serum Calcium Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Magnesium Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
Baseline and Days 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 15, 22, 29, 30, 31, 34, 36, 39, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 113 days
|
The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0.
The investigator assessed whether AEs were possibly related to study drug by answering the question: "Is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the investigational product?"
Abnormal laboratory findings without clinical significance (based on the investigator's judgment) were not recorded as AEs, however, laboratory value changes that required treatment or adjustment in current therapy were considered AEs.
A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: • fatal, • life-threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death), • requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, • congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or • other medically important serious event.
|
113 days
|
|
Maximum Observed Serum Denosumab Concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
Serum concentrations of denosumab were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 20 ng/mL.
|
Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
|
Time to Maximum Observed Serum Denosumab Concentration (Tmax)
Time Frame: Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
Serum concentrations of denosumab were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 20 ng/mL.
|
Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
|
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 4 Weeks (AUC0-4wks) After Dose 1
Time Frame: Days 1, 8, 15, and 29 (predose)
|
Estimated using the linear trapezoidal method.
|
Days 1, 8, 15, and 29 (predose)
|
|
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Weeks (AUC0-12wks) After Dose 2
Time Frame: Days 29 (predose), 36, 43, 57, 71, and 85
|
Estimated using the linear trapezoidal method.
|
Days 29 (predose), 36, 43, 57, 71, and 85
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum C-Telopeptide Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
Baseline and Days 1 and 29 (predose), and on Days 8, 15, 36, 43, 57, 71, 85, and 113
|
|
|
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-denosumab Antibodies
Time Frame: From Day 1 (predose) to Day 113
|
From Day 1 (predose) to Day 113
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
January 1, 2013
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
March 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 3, 2011
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
November 4, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
February 19, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 22, 2016
Last Verified
January 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20101361
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Renal Impairment
-
Eisai Inc.CompletedHepatic Impairment; Renal ImpairmentUnited States
-
JW PharmaceuticalCompletedHealthy, Renal ImpairmentKorea, Republic of
-
Kowa Research Institute, Inc.CompletedSevere Renal ImpairmentUnited States
-
Gilead SciencesTerminatedSevere Renal ImpairmentUnited States
-
Sparrow PharmaceuticalsRecruitingModerate Renal ImpairmentUnited States
-
Centre for Probe Development and CommercializationSt. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton; McMaster UniversityCompleted
-
Sichuan Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., LtdThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityCompletedChronic Renal ImpairmentChina
-
Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.CompletedHealthy Subjects | Severe Renal ImpairmentCzechia
-
Melbourne HealthWithdrawnRenal Impairment After Cardiac SurgeryAustralia
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedMild and Moderate Renal ImpairmentRussian Federation, Germany, Serbia
Clinical Trials on Denosumab
-
Wuhan Union Hospital, ChinaNot yet recruitingHealthy | Osteoarthritis | Osteoporosis | Osteoporosis (Senile) | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the KneeChina
-
Suzhou Suncadia Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.RecruitingFor Prevention of Bone Events in Patients With Bone Metastases From Solid TumorsChina
-
Borstkanker Onderzoek GroepAmgenWithdrawn
-
AmgenCompletedOsteoporosis | Osteopenia | Low Bone Mineral Density | Low Bone Mass | Males With Osteoporosis
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalKorea, Republic of
-
Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd.CompletedPostmenopausal OsteoporosisPoland
-
AmgenCompletedPostmenopausal OsteoporosisUnited States, Denmark, Poland, Canada
-
AmgenCompletedHealthy VolunteerUnited States
-
Luye Pharma Group Ltd.ParexelCompleted