Bioabsorbable Versus Durable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent (DES): a Meta-analysis

November 4, 2011 updated by: Lupi Alessandro, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita

Bioabsorbable Versus Permanent Polymer Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Disease: Insights From a Meta-analysis of 6221 Patients

Evidence supporting use of bioabsorbable polymer drug eluting stents (BP-DES) is uncertain. Thus the investigators planned a meta-analysis to compare outcomes of BP-DES versus PP-DES in obstructive coronary artery disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Evidence supporting use of bioabsorbable polymer drug eluting stents (BP-DES) is uncertain. Previous studies suggested that BP-DES are at least as effective as durable polymer drug eluting stents (PP-DES). Thus the investigators planned a meta-analysis to compare outcomes of BP-DES versus PP-DES in obstructive coronary artery disease. Medline and Web databases were searched for studies comparing BP-DES and PP-DES for obstructive coronary disease, reporting rates of overall mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial infarction (MI), binary restenosis and late lumen loss (LLL) with a follow-up ≥ 6 months. Odds ratios (ORs) will be computed from individual studies and pooled according to a fixed effect (e.g. inverse variance weighting) or random effect model in case of statistical heterogeneity. Given the a priori heterogeneous nature of the observational analyses, separate subgroup analysis of studies with PLA bioabsorbable polymer loaded with biolimus A19 (BP-BES) is prespecified.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

6221

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Novara, Italy, 28100
        • Ospedale Maggiore della Carità

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with coronary artery disease with indication to percutaneous coronary intervention

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • randomized studies
  • studies reporting clinical outcomes as overall death and/or acute myocardial infarction and/or late stent thrombosis (ARC definition)[**] and/or target lesion revascularization and/or late lumen loss
  • follow up period longer than 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • duplicate reporting (in which case the manuscript reporting the largest sample or the longest follow-up was selected)
  • inability to compute risk estimates due to absence of clinical event in one of the groups
  • studies presenting composite major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and not individual end points.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
permanent polymer DES
patients with coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention with BP-DES are compared with patients with coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention with PP-DES
bioabsorbable polymer DES
patients with coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention with BP-DES are compared with patients with coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention with PP-DES

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall mortality
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
late coronary lumen loss
Time Frame: 9 month
9 month
target lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 9 month
9 month
Late stent thrombosis
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Binary restenosis
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alessandro Lupi, MD, AOU Maggiore della Carità

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 8, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2011

Last Verified

November 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on percutaneous coronary intervention with stent

Subscribe