Feasibility of a Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Decision-Making Intervention Among HIV-infected Adults (LEAP-C)

May 29, 2013 updated by: Carol Bova, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Feasibility of a HCV Decision-Making Intervention Among HIV-infected Adults

The purpose of the LEAP-C (learning, experiencing and preparing for hepatitis C treatment) study is to see if a brief (4-week) small group intervention will help people with HIV/HCV co-infection make an informed decision about Hepatitis C treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection is a major problem for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-infected patients. Without HCV treatment, increasing numbers of HIV positive patients will die either from end stage liver disease or from HIV-related complications because of the inability to use antiretroviral agents due their hepatotoxicity. Major advances in understanding HCV treatment in this population have occurred within the past several years. Yet, only a small proportion of co-infected patients receive HCV treatment (approximately 15%). Moreover, few studies have explored patient decision-making related to HCV treatment in HIV co-infected patients. The major gap in our knowledge is how best to support patients as they engage in the HCV treatment decision making process with their health care provider. Therefore, the purpose of this phase II study is to test the feasibility of conducting a theoretically-derived group intervention with HIV/HCV co-infected adults to support active engagement in HCV treatment decision-making. The primary aims are to: (1) determine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining a sample of HIV/HCV co-infected adults to complete a protocol that involves randomization into the 4-week HCV Positive Life Skills group intervention or usual care and completion of two data collection interviews (at baseline and week 12), (2) establish the preliminary effect size of the HCV Positive Life Skills group intervention on HCV knowledge, decisional conflict, patient-provider communication, health-related quality of life, symptom experience and engagement with health care providers, (3) explore the capacity of the group intervention to influence HCV knowledge, decisional conflict, patient-provider communication, engagement with health care providers, health related quality of life and symptom experience and (4) describe the components of the intervention and usual care (through qualitative interviews) that are most useful for helping HIV/HCV co-infected patients engage in decision-making about HCV treatment. A mixed method approach will be used. 50 HIV/HCV co-infected participants will be randomized equally to receive either the group intervention or usual care. Then qualitative interviews, using qualitative descriptive methods, will be conducted with 10-12 participants to identify the most salient parts of the intervention and usual care that support effective decision-making about HCV treatment. The investigators will also compare the time spent with both groups, identify variability in the control condition, describe the number of subjects who start HCV treatment and further refine the intervention manual and intervention fidelity procedures in preparation for a full scale multi-site randomized clinical trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
        • University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Men and Women (18 years of age or older) who have both HIV and chronic Hepatitis C (they need to have a detectable Hepatitis C viral load)

HIV/HCV co-infected adults who have NEVER started treatment

HIV/HCV co-infected adults who DO NOT have a MEDICAL reason that would make it dangerous to treat their hepatitis C (for example, severe cirrhosis already)

HIV/HCV co-infected adults who would be willing to be RANDOMIZED into a group session or standard of care (one on one care with a HCV provider)

Exclusion Criteria:

Non-English Speaking

Children under age 18

HCV mono-infected adults

HIV/HCV co-infected adults who have received any HCV treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of care referral to specialist
Subjects are referred for education, counseling and evaluation for HCV treatment to a specialty health care provider
Experimental: LEAP-C Group Intervention
4-week group intervention to help HIV/HCV co-infected patients reframe negative appraisals associated with HCV treatment to decrease decisional conflict, increase HCV knowledge, improve communication
4-week group intervention to help HIV/HCV co-infected patients reframe negative appraisals associated with hCV treatment, increase HCV knowledge, increase skills related to working with health care providers
Other Names:
  • LEAP-C

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease in decisional conflict related to HCV treatment 12 weeks post treatment
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention decreased decisional conflict.
Up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of subjects electing HCV treatment 6 months after enrollment in the feasibility study.
Time Frame: 6 months
Collect data on the study sample to determine the proportion of subjects who began HCV treatment 6 months after enrollment in the study.
6 months
Increase in knowledge related to HCV treatment 12 weeks post treatment
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Collect data at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention improved HCV-related knowledge.
Up to 12 weeks
Increase in communication between subject and health care provider from baseline to week 12.
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has improved the subjects' perception of communication with their health care provider.
Up to 12 weeks
Increase in subjects' health related quality of life from baseline to 12 weeks after study enrollment
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has improved subjects' perception of health related quality of life.
Up to 12 weeks
Number of symptoms experienced by HCV infected subjects from baseline to week 12
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has decreased the number of symptoms experienced by the research subjects.
Up to 12 weeks
Severity of symptoms experienced by HCV infected subjects from baseline to week 12
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Collect data on the study sample at baseline and week 12 to determine whether the intervention has decreased the severity of symptoms experienced by the research subjects.
Up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 16, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis c

Clinical Trials on Leap-c group intervention

Subscribe