- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01472835
Effect of Sedation on Diagnostic Injections
October 31, 2016 updated by: Steven P. Cohen, Johns Hopkins University
Randomized, Cross-over Study Evaluating the Effect of Sedation on Pain Relief After Diagnostic Injections
Interventional pain procedures have diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic value.
It is well-documented that the reference standard for identifying a pain generator is a low-volume block performed with local anesthetic, with or without steroid.
Many factors may increase the false positive (FP) rate of diagnostic and prognostic nerve blocks; however, the use of sedation is the most controversial and remediable.
Proponents of sedation argue that it has little effect on the rate of positive diagnostic blocks, and may even reduce the false-negative rate.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of intravenous sedation on pain relief and the "false-positive rate" after diagnostic nerve blocks.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Sixty-eight patients with sacroiliac (SI) joint or sympathetically-maintained pain will be randomized in a crossover fashion to receive diagnostic nerve blocks either with or without intravenous sedation.
Among those who obtain some benefit and return for a 2nd block, this 2nd procedure will be done with sedation if the first was done without sedation, and vice versa.
Midazolam and fentanyl will be used for intravenous sedation, titrated to anxiolysis and analgesia.
Pain scores (0-10 numerical rating scale, or NRS) and an activity log will be recorded over the 8-hours following the blocks via a pain diary.
The first follow-up visit will be 4 weeks after the procedure.
Patients who obtain some benefit but continue to report significant pain or who might otherwise benefit from a repeat procedure will have this second procedure performed with sedation if no sedation was given for the first procedure, and without sedation if sedation was administered for the first procedure.
The post-procedure pain data will be recorded in the same fashion as the initial nerve block.
The second follow-up visit will be 4 weeks after the 2nd block.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
73
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
- Johns Hopkins Blaustein Pain Treatment Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Chronic pain > 4 weeks but < 10 years in duration
- Suspected SI joint or sympathetically-maintained pain based on history and physical exam
- May benefit from a sacroiliac joint or sympathetic block
- Pain on 0-10 NRS scale > 3/10 in intensity
Exclusion Criteria:
- No previous interventional pain-alleviating injections for the same condition within the past 3 years
- Uncontrolled coagulopathy
- Pregnancy, which will be ruled out by a urine pregnancy test in women of childbearing age
- Allergy to contrast dye or amide local anesthetics
- Unstable medical or psychiatric condition (e.g. unstable angina, congestive heart failure or severe depression) that could preclude an optimal treatment response
- Systemic infection
- Age < 18 or > 75 years
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sedation
Pt will receive sedation with their procedure
|
Used for anxiolysis
Used for analgesia and as a sedative
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Patient will not receive sedation during procedure
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Score
Time Frame: through 6 hours after injection
|
pain diary using 0-10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
|
through 6 hours after injection
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Score
Time Frame: 1-month
|
0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scale.
0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain.
|
1-month
|
|
Procedure-related Pain Score
Time Frame: 1 day
|
0-10 pain scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
|
1 day
|
|
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 1-month
|
Measure of functional capacity on a scale ranging from 0% to 100%, with 0% signifying no disability
|
1-month
|
|
Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 day
|
5-point Likert scale.
The scale is from 1-5. 1 being very unsatisfied and 5 being very satisfied.
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Cohen SP, Hurley RW. The ability of diagnostic spinal injections to predict surgical outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6):1756-75, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287637.30163.a2.
- Cohen SP, Hameed H, Kurihara C, Pasquina PF, Patel AM, Babade M, Griffith SR, Erdek ME, Jamison DE, Hurley RW. The effect of sedation on the accuracy and treatment outcomes for diagnostic injections: a randomized, controlled, crossover study. Pain Med. 2014 Apr;15(4):588-602. doi: 10.1111/pme.12389. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2011
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 16, 2011
First Posted (Estimate)
November 17, 2011
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
December 15, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2016
Last Verified
October 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Arthralgia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- GABA Modulators
- GABA Agents
- Fentanyl
- Midazolam
Other Study ID Numbers
- NA_00045905
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sacroiliac Joint Pain
-
PainTEQ, LLCNot yet recruitingSacroiliac Joint Pain | Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
-
SI-BONE, Inc.Active, not recruitingSacroiliac Joint Pain | Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction | Sacroiliac Disorder | Sacroiliac; FusionUnited States
-
SI-BONE, Inc.Not yet recruitingSacroiliac Joint Disruption | Degenerative Sacroiliitis | Sacro Iliac Joint Pain | Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction | Sacroiliac Disorder | Sacro-iliac Joints
-
Elite College of Management Sciences, Gujranwala...CompletedSacro Iliac Joint Pain | Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction | Sacroiliac DisorderPakistan
-
PainTEQ, LLCNot yet recruitingSacroiliac Joint Pain
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
SI-BONE, Inc.Active, not recruitingSacroiliac Joint Pain | Sacroiliac Joint DysfunctionUnited States
-
Tri-Service General HospitalNot yet recruitingSacroiliac Joint Pain | Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
-
Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education...CompletedSacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction | Sacroiliac Joint PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University Health Network, TorontoCompletedSacroiliac Joint Arthritis Causing Low Back PainCanada
Clinical Trials on Midazolam
-
Erzurum City HospitalNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pain | Preoperative Anxiety | Adenotonsillectomy | Surgical Stress ResponseTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research...Not yet recruitingPediatric Anesthesia | PremedicationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
SYED HAIDER ALINot yet recruitingSedation and Analgesia Management in Patients Undergoing Flexible Bronchoscopy
-
PfizerCompleted
-
University of Tennessee Graduate School of MedicineCompletedSedation | VasectomyUnited States
-
Seattle Children's HospitalCompleted
-
Beijing Anzhen HospitalCompletedAtrial Fibrillation (AF) | Deep Sedation | PFAChina
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingVitreoretinal SurgeryEgypt
-
Ganzhou Hemay Pharmaceutical Co., LtdCompleted
-
Zhuji People's Hospital of Zhejiang ProvinceCompletedCesarean Section | Efficacy | Safety | Pre-eclampsia | MidazolamChina