Effect of Sedation on Diagnostic Injections

October 31, 2016 updated by: Steven P. Cohen, Johns Hopkins University

Randomized, Cross-over Study Evaluating the Effect of Sedation on Pain Relief After Diagnostic Injections

Interventional pain procedures have diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic value. It is well-documented that the reference standard for identifying a pain generator is a low-volume block performed with local anesthetic, with or without steroid. Many factors may increase the false positive (FP) rate of diagnostic and prognostic nerve blocks; however, the use of sedation is the most controversial and remediable. Proponents of sedation argue that it has little effect on the rate of positive diagnostic blocks, and may even reduce the false-negative rate. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of intravenous sedation on pain relief and the "false-positive rate" after diagnostic nerve blocks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sixty-eight patients with sacroiliac (SI) joint or sympathetically-maintained pain will be randomized in a crossover fashion to receive diagnostic nerve blocks either with or without intravenous sedation. Among those who obtain some benefit and return for a 2nd block, this 2nd procedure will be done with sedation if the first was done without sedation, and vice versa. Midazolam and fentanyl will be used for intravenous sedation, titrated to anxiolysis and analgesia. Pain scores (0-10 numerical rating scale, or NRS) and an activity log will be recorded over the 8-hours following the blocks via a pain diary. The first follow-up visit will be 4 weeks after the procedure. Patients who obtain some benefit but continue to report significant pain or who might otherwise benefit from a repeat procedure will have this second procedure performed with sedation if no sedation was given for the first procedure, and without sedation if sedation was administered for the first procedure. The post-procedure pain data will be recorded in the same fashion as the initial nerve block. The second follow-up visit will be 4 weeks after the 2nd block.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

73

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Johns Hopkins Blaustein Pain Treatment Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pain > 4 weeks but < 10 years in duration
  • Suspected SI joint or sympathetically-maintained pain based on history and physical exam
  • May benefit from a sacroiliac joint or sympathetic block
  • Pain on 0-10 NRS scale > 3/10 in intensity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No previous interventional pain-alleviating injections for the same condition within the past 3 years
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy
  • Pregnancy, which will be ruled out by a urine pregnancy test in women of childbearing age
  • Allergy to contrast dye or amide local anesthetics
  • Unstable medical or psychiatric condition (e.g. unstable angina, congestive heart failure or severe depression) that could preclude an optimal treatment response
  • Systemic infection
  • Age < 18 or > 75 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sedation
Pt will receive sedation with their procedure
Used for anxiolysis
Used for analgesia and as a sedative
No Intervention: Control
Patient will not receive sedation during procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score
Time Frame: through 6 hours after injection
pain diary using 0-10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
through 6 hours after injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score
Time Frame: 1-month
0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scale. 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain.
1-month
Procedure-related Pain Score
Time Frame: 1 day
0-10 pain scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
1 day
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 1-month
Measure of functional capacity on a scale ranging from 0% to 100%, with 0% signifying no disability
1-month
Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 day
5-point Likert scale. The scale is from 1-5. 1 being very unsatisfied and 5 being very satisfied.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Clinical Trials on Midazolam

Subscribe