Comparative Study Between Different Additives to Lidocaine 2٪ for Peribulbar Block in Vitreoretinal Surgery

April 6, 2026 updated by: Waleed Adel Ahmed, Sohag University

Comparative Study Between Different Additives to Lidocaine 2٪ for Peribulbar Block in Vitreoretinal Surgery (Prospective Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial

Peribulbar block, is the favored anesthetic technique for numerous ophthalmic procedures due to its lower rate of associated complications .

Retinal surgeries have many problems to the anesthesiologists as these operations are often lengthy , involve a significant risk of postoperative pain ,and typically involve an elderly patient population with multiple comorbidities .

Many anesthesiologists consider the peribulbar block as a safe technique; however, it has the disadvantage of a slow onset of orbital akinesia and to produce it a more substantial volume or repeated injections of local anesthetic solution is required due to limited diffusion of local anesthetics . This also increases the frequency of complications, such as globe perforation and peribulbar hemorrhage .

To prevent this and to increase tissue perfusion, hyaluronidase and other adjuvants such as clonidine, epinephrine and alkalinization of local anesthetics were used to improve peribulbar block.

Hyaluronidase may reduce tissue viscosity , which facilitate the complete diffusion of anesthetic solution along tissue planes .

in regional anesthesia is the addition of hyaluronidase is associated with benefits such as faster onest of action and impoved block quality ,however ,evidence regarding its efficacy in peribulbar techniques remains inconsistent.

To improve the quality and duration of the block, various adjuvants have been investigated. Two promising agents are Midazolam, a benzodiazepine with hypothesized peripheral GABA-ergic action, and Cisatracurium, a non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent. Midazolam may enhance sensory block and provide amnesia, while cisatracurium directly induces chemical paralysis of the extraocular muscles. However, a direct comparative study of their efficacy and safety profiles in this context is lacking. This study aims to fill that gap .

90 eligible patients were randomly allocated into three groups using computer-generated random numbers placed in sealed, opaque envelopes.

  • Group L (Control): lidocaine 2٪ (4 ml) + Normal Saline (1 ml).
  • Group M (Midazolam): lidocaine 2٪ % (4 ml) + Midazolam (1 mg in 1 ml).
  • Group C (Cisatracurium): lidocaine 2٪ (4 ml) + Cisatracurium (0.5 mg in 0.5 ml) + Normal Saline (0.5 ml).

The total volume of the injectate was standardized to 5 ml for all groups.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Sohag Governorate
      • Sohag, Sohag Governorate, Egypt, 0123

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III patients -enrolled for elective vitreoretinal procedures under peribulbar block.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • allergy to study drugs
  • coagulopathy
  • infection at the injection site
  • significant axial myopia (axial length >26mm)
  • neurological or neuromuscular disorders
  • pregnancy
  • inability to communicate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: · Group L (Control): lidocaine 2٪ (4 ml) + Normal Saline (1 ml).
· Group L (Control): peribulper lidocaine 2٪ (4 ml) + Normal Saline (1 ml).
peribulber injection of lidocaine 2٪ (4 ml) + Normal Saline (1 ml).
Active Comparator: Group M (Midazolam): lidocaine 2٪ % (4 ml) + Midazolam (1 mg in 1 ml).
Group M (Midazolam):peribulber injection of lidocaine 2٪ % (4 ml) + Midazolam (1 mg in 1 ml).
peribulber injection of idocaine 2٪ % (4 ml) + Midazolam (1 mg in 1 ml).
Active Comparator: · Group C (Cisatracurium): lidocaine 2٪ (4 ml) + Cisatracurium (0.5 mg in 0.5 ml) + Normal Saline (
· Group C (Cisatracurium): peribulber injection oflidocaine 2٪ (4 ml) + Cisatracurium (0.5 mg in 0.5 ml) + Normal Saline (0.5 ml).
peribulber injection of lidocaine 2٪ (4 ml) + Cisatracurium (0.5 mg in 0.5 ml) + Normal Saline (0.5 ml).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Onset of Akinesia
Time Frame: investigator assess muscle tone immediately after start of anesthesia and every 15 minute up to end of surgery
onset of muscle paralysis (loss of muscle tone)
investigator assess muscle tone immediately after start of anesthesia and every 15 minute up to end of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitreoretinal Surgery

Clinical Trials on Group L (Control)

Subscribe