Sorafenib VS TACE in HCC Patients With Portal Vein Invasion

April 28, 2016 updated by: Seoul National University Hospital

An Open Label, Phase 2 Trial Comparing Sorafenib And TACE in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion

The investigators are going to compare the therapeutic effect of sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with major branch of portal vein invasion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

TACE is an established therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has been shown to significantly improve survival in these patients compared to no treatment. Moreover, TACE can be performed safely and may improve the overall survival of patients with HCC and major branch of portal vein invasion. Sorafenib, already approved for HCC, could lead to significantly improvement in tumor control and survival in patients with advanced stage HCC. So far there are no head to head comparison reports about the efficacy of Sorafenib and TACE. Here the investigators evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib and TACE in advanced HCC with major branch of portal vein invasion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Seoul National University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 80 > Age >= 18 years.
  2. Child-Pugh class A (class B could be included when Childs score is 7).
  3. Hepatocellular carcinoma with major branch of portal vein invasion on dynamic CT or MRI

    • not only newly diagnosed treatment-naive patients,
    • but also HCC patients previously treated with other therapies in case of development of major branch of portal vein invasion
  4. Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements:

    • White blood cell counts (WBC) >= 2,000 /μl, Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,200/μl
    • Hemoglobin >= 8.0 g/dl
    • Platelet count > 50,000/μl
    • Serum creatinine < 1.7 mg/dl
    • Total bilirubin =< 3.0 mg/dl
    • Prothrombin Time (PT)-international normalized ratio (INR) =< 2.3 or Prothrombin Time (PT)-sec =< 6 sec
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Child-Pugh score >= 8.
  2. Age < 18 or >= 80 years.
  3. ECOG Performance Status >= 3.
  4. Recipient of living donor or deceased donor liver transplantation
  5. Patients unable to understand the contents of informed consent or refuse to sign the informed consent.
  6. Patients with evidence of uncontrolled or severe medical conditions requiring treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sorafenib
Sorafenib 400mg po bid
Sorafenib 400mg po bid
Other Names:
  • Nexavar
Experimental: TACE for HCC with portal vein invasion
Antineoplastic agents are directly injected into the hepatic artery, allowing high intratumoral concentrations of drugs and thereby reducing systemic side effects. The mixture of chemotherapeutic agents and iodized oil is almost completely retained in neoplastic nodules and can remain in HCC tissue for a long time. Subsequent mechanical embolization of the artery feeding the neoplasm causes ischemic damage to the tumor and prolongs the duration of the effects of chemotherapeutic agents.
The volume of iodized oil ranged from 2 to 12 mL, and the amount of doxorubicin ranged from 10 to 60 mg. Gelatin sponge particles were mixed with mitomycin and contrast material.Cisplatin was infused at the tumor feeder vessels as a solution with a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL at a rate of 5-10 mL/min. The total amount of cisplatin used ranged from 50 to 100 mg depending on the patient's body weight and the level of infusion.
Other Names:
  • TACE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to Progression (Efficacy)
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 3 years
every 6 weeks up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 3 years
every 6 weeks up to 3 years
objective tumor response rate
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 3 years
Determined by dynamic-perfusion CT scan at the end of each cycle
every 6 weeks up to 3 years
objective tumor control rate
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 3 years
Determined by dynamic-perfusion CT scan at the end of each cycle
every 6 weeks up to 3 years
progression-free survival
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 3 years
every 6 weeks up to 3 years
the adverse event rate and examine the toxicities
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 3 years
The investigators will evaluate the adverse event according to Common Toxicity Criteria(version 4.0)by National Cancer Institute of National Institutes of Health
every 6 weeks up to 3 years
Change of perfusion parameter
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 3 years
every 6 weeks up to 3 years
Alpha feto protein (AFP) responsiveness
Time Frame: every 6 weeks up to 3 years
AFP responder : 20% reduction from baseline AFP level after 6 weeks of treatment
every 6 weeks up to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Sorafenib

Subscribe