- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01496001
Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes After Breast Conserving Surgery
The Effect of Tumor - Breast Volume Ratio on Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes in Breast Conserving Surgery Patients; a Prospective Cohort Study
The initial aesthetic and functional conditions are recorded with the help of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS),an international validated questionnaire, and the Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment - cosmetic results (BCCT.core) validated computer software, allowing for comparison. Determination of the initial quality of life is measured with the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire number C30-BR23 (EORTC QoL C30-BR23).
Patients then undergo surgical treatment according to institutional protocols. Following conventional marking of the orientation of the specimen, it is measured by an analytical scale.
Histological examination of the specimen will record the largest diameters, and parameters of the lymph nodes, according to the institutional protocol.
On the 4th week following surgery, assuming that wound healing is completed, patients' data are again recorded in BCTOS, BCCT.core and EORTC QoL C30-BR23. A third set of data are gained after completion of adjuvant radiotherapy, on the 8th postoperative month. Magnetic resonance imaging is performed to assess the volume of the contralateral breast.
Tumor - breast volume ratio is calculated, and matched up with cosmetic results in each quadrant, threshold value in the quadrants, above of which it is not advisable to perform conventional breast conserving surgery due to poor outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1122
- National Institute of Oncology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- early breast cancer
- unilateral tumor
- tumor size is less than 3 cm
Exclusion Criteria:
- age over 70
- malignant invasive tumor in the past
- pregnancy
- previous surgical treatment of the breast or axilla
- central breast tumor sizing <3 cm
- a need for mastectomy
- tumor size >3 cm measured by mammography or physical examination
- surgical excisions resulting in positive margins
- surgical or radiotherapeutic complication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cohort
|
Wide excision of primary tumor (using 1 cm surgical margins).
Minimally invasive biopsy of the sentinel lymph node.
Adjuvant radiotherapy carried out by institutional protocols.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary outcome is the determination of the critical tumor / breast volume ratio in each quadrant, above of which number breast conserving surgery could not offer adequate cosmetic and functional results.
Time Frame: 8 months
|
Data of eligible patients are recorded by the study physicians on a locally developed questionnaire. Digital photos are taken of each patient producing a frontal and two side views. Images are processed by the BCCT.core software (Breast Cancer Conservation Treatment. cosmetic results). Magnetic resonance imaging is implemented and used to calculate breast volume with the help of Amira 5.1 software (Visage Imaging GmbH)trial version. Excised tumor is measured by a validated analytical scale. |
8 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessing the clinical applicability of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS).
Time Frame: 8 months for each patient
|
Initial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken. |
8 months for each patient
|
|
Assessing the relationship between cosmetic+functional results and quality of life.
Time Frame: 8 months for each patient
|
Initial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Initial quality of life is assessed by the validated EORTC QoL C30-BR23. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken. |
8 months for each patient
|
|
Assessing the effect of surgical intervention on cosmetic+functional results and quality of life.
Time Frame: During 8 postoperative months
|
Initial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Initial quality of life is assessed by the validated EORTC QoL C30-BR23. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken. |
During 8 postoperative months
|
|
Assessing the effect of radiotherapeutical intervention on cosmetic+functional results and quality of life.
Time Frame: During 8 postoperative months
|
Initial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Initial quality of life is assessed by the validated EORTC QoL C30-BR23. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken. |
During 8 postoperative months
|
|
Assessing the clinical applicability of the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire C30-BR23 (EORTC QoL C30-BR23) validated questionnaire.
Time Frame: 8 months
|
Initial quality of life is assessed by the validated EORTC QoL C30-BR23.
Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols.
On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core,
EORTC QoL C30-BR23.
After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken.
|
8 months
|
|
Assessing the clinical applicability of the BCCT.core software.
Time Frame: 8 months
|
Initial cosmetic and functional status is recorded by using the validated BCTOS and the BCCT.core software. Patients then undergo surgical procedure according to institutional protocols. On the 4th postoperative week, patients status is recorded by BCTOS, BCTOS.core, EORTC QoL C30-BR23. After adjuvant radiotherapy (according to institutional protocols), in the 8th postoperative month, cosmetic and functional status and quality of life are assessed again with the same methods, and MR images are taken. |
8 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NIO-BCS-QoL
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.