Very Low Tidal Volume vs Conventional Ventilatory Strategy for One-lung Ventilation in Thoracic Anesthesia

November 29, 2022 updated by: Giorgio Della Rocca, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della Misericordia

Multicenter Randomized Trial on Protective Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation During OLV in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery

The purpose of this study is to determine if a protective ventilatory strategy during one-lung ventilation (OLV) based on low tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver can reduce Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after major pulmonary resection.

Primary endpoint: Evaluation of postoperative ARDS incidence

Secondary endpoint: Evaluation od PPC incidence and postoperative outcomes (other complications, unplanned Intensive Care Admission, hospital and ICU length of stay, in-hospital mortality)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Pulmonary postoperative complications (PPCs) are the most frequent adverse events after thoracic surgery. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe among PPCs. Injurious mechanical ventilation is a recognized risk factor associated with ARDS and PPCs after major thoracic surgery.

International literature reports a wide use of tidal volume around 5-6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) during one lung ventilation (OLV) but variable use of PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM).

The aim of this multicenter, randomized, single blind study is to determine if a protective ventilatory strategy during OLV based on low tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver compared to conventional strategy can reduce ARDS and PPCs after major pulmonary resection.

Primary outcome is the incidence of in-hospital ARDS.

Secondary outcomes are in-hospital incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), major cardiovascular events, unplanned Intensive Care Unit admission, in-hospital length of stay and mortality

RANDOMIZATION

Patients are randomly assigned to receive protective or conventional OLV according to a computer-generated randomization list (1:1 ratio) before anesthesia induction.

Patients are blinded to the treatment. Anesthesiologists and surgeons are unblinded to the treatment during the surgical procedure and the postoperative outcome assessment.

MEASUREMENTS

Intraoperative collection of ventilatory settings, airway pressures, arterial blood gases analysis at the following time points:

T1: two lung ventilation in supine position before placing the patient in lateral decubitus; T2: 30 minutes after OLV start; T3: 60 minutes after OLV start; T4: 20 minutes after lobectomy/pneumonectomy (during OLV); T5: 15 minutes after ARM in supine position and during two lung ventilation.

Postoperative data collection 1, 12, 24, 36, 48 hours after surgery and at discharge. Arterial blood gas analysis will be performed 1 hour after extubation and 24 and 72 hours after surgery (or in case of respiratory insufficiency).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

984

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bergamo, Italy
        • Asst Papa Giovanni XXIII
      • Bologna, Italy
        • IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi
      • Bolzano, Italy
        • Ospedale Centrale
      • Cagliari, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu - Ospedale Oncologico Businco
      • Genova, Italy
        • IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
      • Milan, Italy
        • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori
      • Milan, Italy
        • Irccs Ospedale San Raffaele
      • Modena, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria
      • Napoli, Italy
        • Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale
      • Padova, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria
      • Rionero In Vulture, Italy
        • IRCCS Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico Della Basilicata
      • Rome, Italy
        • Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena
      • Siena, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
      • Trieste, Italy
        • Ospedale di Cattinara
      • Udine, Italy, 33100
        • Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit
      • Varese, Italy
        • Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years
  • ASA IV
  • Elective thoracotomies or thoracoscopic major lung resection surgery (lobectomy, bilobectomy, pneumonectomy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Wedge resection or atypical resection
  • Non-resective lung surgery requiring OLV
  • Patients < 18 years
  • BMI < 20 and BMI > 29
  • Heart disease with ejection fraction <50% and/or severe valvulopathy
  • Pulmonary hypertension
  • Renal failure requiring dialytic treatment
  • Drug addiction
  • Mental retardation, depression and psychiatric disease
  • Motor or sensory deficit
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Protective

Two-lung ventilation (TLV): tidal volume = 8 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 25 cm H2O, I: E = 1:2; after lung re-expansion to the closure of the chest will set a PEEP of 5 cmH2O

OLV (OLV): 4 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 35 cmH2O, respiratory rate <30, I:E = 1:2 / 1:3.

During OLV in case of desaturation (before increasing the FiO2) and every 60 minutes alveolar recruitment maneuvers followed by the setting of PEEP to 5 cmH2O

Low tidal volume, PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuver
No Intervention: Conventional

Two-lung ventilation (TLV): tidal volume = 8 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 25 cmH2O; I: E = 1:2; after lung re-expansion to the closure of the chest PEEP set to 5 cmH2O

OLV (OLV): 6 mL / kg PBW, peak airway pressure ≤ 35 cmH2O; I: E = 1:2.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) incidence
Time Frame: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
incidence of ARDS (%)
Hospital stay (7 days average expected)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs)
Time Frame: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
Incidence of PPCs (%)
Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
To determine mortality (%)
Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
To determine how many patients (%) would have any postoperative complications
Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
Unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission
Time Frame: Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
To determine how many patients would require an ICU admission (%)
Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of stay
Time Frame: Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Length of stay in ICU (days)
Hospital stay (7 days average aspected)
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Hospital stay (7 days average expected)
Duration of hospital length of stay
Hospital stay (7 days average expected)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Giorgio Della Rocca, MD, Prof, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia - Udine. Italy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

January 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Protective one lung ventilation

Subscribe