Impact of Intraperitonael Nebulization of Local Anesthetic on Postoperative Pain Associated With Laparoscopic Surgery

January 18, 2012 updated by: Pablo Mauricio Ingelmo M.D., San Gerardo Hospital
Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic procedures have provided conflicting results. This randomized, double-blind study was designed to assess the effects of a novel intraperitoneal local anesthetic administration technique using nebulization on pain relief after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic (LA) instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic surgery have provided conflicting results. One of the factors that might contribute to failure of the instillation technique may be related to inadequate distribution of local anesthetic throughout the peritoneal surface. In contrast, nebulization should provide a uniform spread of drugs throughout the peritoneal cavity and thus may be beneficial to improve pain relief after laparoscopic procedures. The investigators reported that a microvibration-based nebulization device (Aeroneb Pro® system, Aerogen, Galway, Ireland) could be used for ropivacaine delivery into the insufflation gas required to create pneumorpeitoneum. The investigators hypothesized that intraperitoneal ropivacaine nebulization would provide superior pain relief than ropivacaine instillation after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. This randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine nebulization before or after surgery compared with intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation and placebo after gynecologic laparoscopic procedures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • MB
      • Monza, MB, Italy, 20052
        • San Gerardo Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females 18-70 years old, ASA score 1 - 3;
  • scheduled for laparoscopic operative surgery in the Obstetrics and Gynecology unit;
  • free from pain in preoperative period, without habitual analgesic use;
  • without cognitive impairment or mental retardation, who gave a written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females under 18 or over 70;
  • ASA 4 or 5;
  • emergency/urgency criteria, postoperative admission in a intensive care unit with sedation or ventilatory assistance; cognitive impairment or mental retardation;
  • habitual analgesic use; progressive degenerative diseases of the CNS;
  • convulsions or chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs;
  • severe hepatic or renal impairment;
  • pregnancy or lactation;
  • allergy to one of the specific substances used in the study;
  • acute infectious disease or inflammatory chronic disease, alcohol or drug addiction;
  • any kind of communication problem;
  • neurologic or psychiatric disease;
  • no written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: CONTROL group
preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml and nebulization of saline before and after surgery
EXPERIMENTAL: PREOPERATIVE nebulization
preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml, nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) before surgery and nebulization of saline 3 ml after surgery
preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml, preoperative nebulization of saline 3 ml and nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) after surgery
EXPERIMENTAL: POSTOPERATIVE nebulization
preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml, nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) before surgery and nebulization of saline 3 ml after surgery
preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml, preoperative nebulization of saline 3 ml and nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) after surgery
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: INSTILLATION group
preoperative instillation of ropivacaine 0,5% 20 ml (100 mg) and nebulization of saline 3 ml before and after surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain
Time Frame: 24 hours
Postoperative pain was assessed by NRS (0 to 10 points) at rest (static NRS) and after a deep inspiration or cough (dynamic NRS). The proportion of patients with adequate pain control after surgery (dynamic NRS < 3) will also be assessed.
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
The total dose of morphine at every evaluation after awakening will be quantified using the PACU clinical chart and/or PCA infusers memory display
24 hours
Unassisted walking time
Time Frame: 24 hours
Unassisted walking time is defined as the time in hours between PACU discharge and when the patient is able to walk out of his room and back to bed without any assistance.
24 hours
Hospital stay
Time Frame: between surgery and discharge
We define hospital stay as the elapsed time between surgery and hospital discharge
between surgery and discharge
hospital morbidity
Time Frame: up to discharge
All complications or adverse effects associated or possibly associated with the interventions under study, surgery or anesthesia will be quantified using the anesthesia charts, surgical charts, surgical database.
up to discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pablo M Ingelmo, MD, San Gerardo Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2012

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery

Clinical Trials on saline

3
Subscribe