Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Synera Patch Compared to Naproxen Sodium for Epicondylitis of the Elbow

Randomized, Parallel-Group, Open Label, Dose Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Synera Patch Compared to Naproxen Sodium for the Treatment of Lateral and Medial Epicondylitis of the Elbow

The purpose of the this study is to evaluate the sfaety and efficacy of Synera(R)for patients with lateral and medial epicondylitis and compare it to Naproxen sodius.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of this single center is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Synera ® in lateral and medial epicondylitis . This is an open-label, comaparative study study where the subjects will be randomized to one of the following groups:

  1. Synera patch ®: A single patch applied for 4 hours twice daily approximatey 12 hrs apart to the medial or lateral side of the index elbow
  2. Synera patch ®: A single patch applied for 12 hours/day to the medial or lateral side of the index elbow
  3. Naproxen Sodium: 500mg bid

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66210
        • International Clinical Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with clinical evidence of lateral or medial epicondylitis of the elbow.
  • Age 18 or higher
  • Minimum of 4 on Question 5 of BPI

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral neuropathy of any origin in the index limb
  • Cubital tunnel syndrome in patients with medial epicondylitis
  • Cortisone injection in the last 4 weeks into the index limb
  • Surgical intervention in the past for the epicondiitis
  • Participants in any other clinical trial in the last 30 days
  • Known allergy to lidocaine, tetracaine, NSAIDs or PABA
  • Uncontrolled pain in the upper extremity or neck that may interfere with evaluation of study drug's response as deemed by the investigator
  • Patient who is deemed to be medically unstable by the principal investigator including but not limited to Liver disease or Cardiac arrhythmias
  • Patients who are pregnant, lactating or breast feeding
  • Vaccination within the last weeks or planning on any vaccinations during the study or for 4 weeks after the study completion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Naproxen
Naproxen 500mg BID for the first 2 weeks
500mg bid
Experimental: Synera single patch applied for 12 hrs/day
1 synera patch to cover the treatment area applied for 12 hours, daily for the first 2 weeks
Topical appication of single patch to elbow for 12hrs/day
Single patch applied to elbow for 4hrs/twice daily
Experimental: Synera sinlgle patch applied for 4hrs twice daily
Topical appication of single patch to elbow for 12hrs/day
Single patch applied to elbow for 4hrs/twice daily
1 synera patch to cover the treatment area applied for 4 hours, twice daily for the first 2 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline recorded at 2 week visit for the question #5 of Brief Pain Inventory (BPI )Scale ® recorded before going to sleep daily
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 14
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI )Scale ® recorded before going to sleep daily by the subject and the answer for question 5 is the basis for primary end poit
Day 1 and Day 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain quality assessment scale
Time Frame: Every visit from the entry
It is a vlaidated measure to assess the qulaity of scale
Every visit from the entry

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Srinivas Nalamachu, MD, International Clinical Research Institute, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 2, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epicondylitis of the Elbow

Clinical Trials on Naproxen

Subscribe