A Clinical Comparison of Two Marketed Skin Barriers on Healthy Volunteers

September 23, 2013 updated by: Independent Nurse Consultants LLC

Phase 4-A Clinical Comparison of a Marketed Moldable Skin Barrier Versus a Marketed Stretch-to-Fit Skin Barrier in Healthy Volunteers

A comparison of two skin barriers on healthy volunteers with a colostomy, ileostomy or urostomy.

Endpoints of comparison include the ability to maintain a secure fit around the stoma, skin protection, wear-time, ease of use, ease of teaching, and comfort.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Study to include 60 subjects, three centers, total of 4 weeks, 2 weeks in each product. Subjects recruited from a population of persons who have had an existing fecal or urinary stoma for a duration of at least three months. There is no restriction on primary diagnosis for ostomy surgery. Subjects must be of legal consenting age, must currently be managing their own stoma with a two piece pouching system, either a pre-cut, cut to fit, moldable or stretch-to-fit, any manufacturer. Subjects may not require convexity and be willing to not to use any accessory products during the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85742
        • Independent Nurse Consultants LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Existing fecal or urinary ostomy for at least three months,consenting age, able to perform independent ostomy care, willing to not use accessory products, currently wearing a 2 piece marketed product.
  • Able to participate for four weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Needing convexity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sur-Fit Natura/FormaFlex
Subject will be on Surfit Moldable for 2 weeks then crossover to Formaflex
ConvaTec Moldable Skin Barrier for ostomy patients
Other Names:
  • ConvaTec Moldable Skin Barrier
Active Comparator: FormaFlex/Sur-Fit Natura
Subject will be on Formaflex for 2 weeks then crossover to Surfit Moldable
Hollister skin barrier for ostomy patients
Other Names:
  • Hollister FormaFlex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ability to maintain secure (snug) fit around stoma
Time Frame: Two weeks
  1. Subject assessment of barrier fit based on questionnaire at each skin barrier change up to 2 weeks
  2. Barrier gap assessment performed by nurse at 2 weeks
  3. Barrier gap assessment performed by subject at each skin barrier change up to 2 weeks
Two weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin Protection
Time Frame: Two weeks
  1. SACS assessment by patient at each barrier change up to 2 weeks
  2. SACS assessment by nurse at 2 weeks
Two weeks
Wear Time
Time Frame: Two weeks
1. Time of barrier change recorded
Two weeks
Ease of use
Time Frame: Two weeks
1. Assessment by subject response to questionnaire
Two weeks
Ease of teaching
Time Frame: Two weeks
1. Assessment by nurse of ability to teach subject to use barrier
Two weeks
Comfort
Time Frame: Two weeks
1. Subject assessment of comfort of barrier at each change
Two weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ann M Durnal, RN BSN WOCN, Independent Nurse Consultants LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 24, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INC#001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peristomal Skin Complication

Clinical Trials on Sur-Fit Natura

Subscribe