Self-administered Intravaginal 2% Lidocaine Gel Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women (LIVIIN)

October 27, 2016 updated by: Sharon Achilles, University of Pittsburgh

Self-administered Intravaginal 2% Lidocaine Gel Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is designed to evaluate if self-inserted intravaginal 2% lidocaine gel is effective at decreasing pain during intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are among the most effective forms of reversible contraception. Numerous studies demonstrate their safety and efficacy in nulliparous women, however, uptake of IUDs in this group is low. One of the major barriers to women obtaining IUDs is fear of pain during insertion, as studies do demonstrate that nulliparous women experience more pain than parous women during IUD insertion. Studies evaluating various methods for pain control during IUD insertion have shown conflicting results, leaving the question unanswered as to what is the best method to decrease pain during IUD insertion.

This study aims to evaluate a novel approach to pain control by having women self-insert lidocaine gel into the vagina at least 5 minutes prior to IUD insertion. This will overcome some of the barriers from other studies where there may not have been ample time for the lidocaine to take effect, while at the same time eliminating the need for women to have multiple speculum exams. Although this is a novel approach to administering an anesthetic, we believe women will be interested in any intervention that may potentially alleviate pain during IUD insertion.

If this study does demonstrate that pain is decreased with self-inserted lidocaine compared to placebo gel, this will potentially eliminate one large barrier to nulliparous women receiving IUDs. Increased uptake of highly effective contraception in nulliparous women is just one of the many steps necessary towards decreasing unintended pregnancy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Magee-Womens Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 55 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Nulliparous, as defined in this study as no history of pregnancy ≥ 24 weeks gestational age
  • Desires insertion of either levonorgestrel-releasing IUD (LNG-IUD) or copper T380A IUD (Cu-IUD)
  • No history of pregnancy in the last 6 weeks
  • Able to provide written informed consent in English and comply with all study procedures

Exclusion criteria:

  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine or other amino amide local anesthetics
  • Prior failed IUD insertion
  • Prior IUD use
  • Use of narcotic or benzodiazepine medication within the last 24 hours
  • U.S. Centers for Disease Control Medical Eligibility Criteria (MEC) category 3 or 4 classification for use of an IUD
  • Positive pregnancy test or reasonable risk of pregnancy due to unprotected heterosexual intercourse since the last menstrual period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1: Intravaginal 2% lidocaine gel
Intravaginal insertion of 4mL of 2% lidocaine gel
Intravaginal insertion of 4mL 2% lidocaine gel
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine Hydrochloride
  • Lidocaine Jelly
Placebo Comparator: Group 2: Intravaginal placebo gel
Intravaginal insertion of 4mL of placebo gel ( K-Y Jelly)
KY Jelly
Other Names:
  • K-Y Jelly
  • water based lubricant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain From Baseline to IUD Insertion
Time Frame: change in pain score from baseline (before IUD insertion) to time of IUD insertion
To assess change in pain from baseline to IUD insertion measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain in patient's life). This pain assessment was prior to (baseline) and at the time of IUD insertion following vaginal self-administration of study gel (either 2% lidocaine gel or placebo gel).
change in pain score from baseline (before IUD insertion) to time of IUD insertion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Evaluate Patient Experience of Self-inserting the Intravaginal Study Gel Prior to IUD
Time Frame: After inserting the gel but prior to IUD insertion
Number of participants who rated self-application of study gel as "some what easy" or "very easy" on Likert scale
After inserting the gel but prior to IUD insertion
Percentage of IUDs Considered by Physicians Easy to Insert
Time Frame: Directly after IUD insertion
The physician who conducted the study visit and IUD insertion was asked about the difficulty/ease in placing the IUD immediately following the procedure and the percentage of IUD insertions considered to be "easy" was calculated for each study group.
Directly after IUD insertion
Need for Pain Medication up to 7 Days
Time Frame: 7 days post-insertion
Number of women taking pain medication for at least one day following IUD insertion
7 days post-insertion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rachel B Rapkin, MD, University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine

Subscribe